What's the difference in this and ALL of your white power posting?
Printable View
Jefferymo, define 'white power'..... To make things a little clearer, when we define black power, we are talking about African demonic, Marxist, un-moral ruling like the Black Panthers and some of the Black Terrorist Organizations that has a play book to go to all White Nations and under mine them plus what is good in America. Haiti, Middle Eastern Black Nations like Yemen, and African Nations are in terrible trouble and always will be because of their demonic morals and culture, even the Bible says so. White power is word used by the unmoral left, Hitler was on the Marxist left list with his Alt Reich (pronounced 'Rite', not Right) program to take over the world, An Austria Jew, that hated other Jews. Note, he was not a German but a immigrate to Germany. The Skin Heads promote 'White Power' because they don't want the Jews to no longer control the Banking and Shipping world wide like the Roth-childs, a dozen families of money and power, plus like George Soros is an example. Most all good Governments are White Power ran, which is good. If Black Power controlled the world, the result would be like the movie, 'Planet of the Apes', with the Statue of Liberty buried.
What the left Marist left is doing right now here in America is declaring whites racist and terrorist, a must to control the good people with guns. In time, take them away because you are white and will fight back. The Biden puppet is putting non Christian unmoral non-whites in key positions, go thru the list, in the Federal Government to start the control of moral whites. Trump's Supreme Courts picks is the only thing that can delay this decay of the Marxist play book. The left: Clamp down on Religion, pro drug dealing, pro drug usage, pro gun control, pro prison release, pro welfare, pro dark skin pay outs (one book writer is pushing for Blacks to receive $18,000,000,000 in re-payments for slavery), family unit redefined then destroyed, pro child sexual abuse by lowering the age, the list is endless. Notice, these are all Negro agendas, not racist to call out the unmoral demonic agenda.
There is no proof that backs up the claim that Hitler was Jewish. Your delusional beliefs that what you've stated is fact doesn't stop your statements from being 100% racist. You believing that black people are immoral is literally what makes you and your statements racist.
I’ve never even heard of the “Hitler was Jewish” claim until NA’s posting.
Well, that’s not really all true. ----
Sort’a like Global Warming, if we are to believe the science side of things, then Hitler does have some Jewish linage.Quote:
One of the most frequently asked questions about the Holocaust and the Nazi party is whether Adolf Hitler was Jewish or had Jewish ancestors.
Though the idea may seem preposterous to some, the question seems to stem from the remote possibility that Hitler's grandfather was Jewish. Hitler's father, Alois, was registered as an illegitimate child with no father when born in 1837 and to this day Hitler's paternal grandfather is unknown. Alois’ mother, Maria Schicklgruber, is known to have worked in the home of a wealthy Jew, so there is some chance, however small, that a son in that household got Hitler's grandmother pregnant.
In 1933, the London Daily Mirror published a picture of a gravestone in a Jewish cemetery in Bucharest inscribed with some Hebrew characters and the name Adolf Hitler, but this Bucharest Hitler could not have been the Nazi leader’s grandfather. At the time, though, this picture sufficiently worried Hitler that he had the Nazi law defining Jewishness written to exclude Jesus Christ and himself.
In 2010, the British paper The Daily Telegraph reported that a study had been conducted in which saliva samples were collected from 39 of Hitler's known relatives to test their DNA origins and found, though inconclusively, that Hitler may have Jewish origins. The paper reported: A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in [the Hitler] samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews ... Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 per cent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 per cent to 30 per cent of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population. This study, though scientific by nature, is inconclusive.
Despite the claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish.
Quote:
Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 per cent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 per cent to 30 per cent of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/was-hitler-jewish
There is incredibly more consensus on the science of global warming compared the Hitler having Jewish ancestry.
Consensus, lol
In the actual scientific community, yes.
Osiris125, Please tell me that you don’t fall for the whole global warming agenda hoopla bs?
For the most part it's only the portion of the actual scientific community who stand to financially benefit in the form of government grants and fellowships or have an investment stake in the economic reaction to global warming.
Undeniably there is a change in global weather patterns but there in no conclusive scientific proof it's caused by human activity. Don't bother posting links, I've done some research on my own.
You believing that black people are immoral is literally what makes you and your statements racist.
Obviously, you got that info from Google. A computer button cannot teach you everything you need to know!
However, tag along with me for a day, so I can change your mind, when you see the carnage that i do! All races have some form of immoralities, but the blacks practice it disproportionately!
Ima capitalist, but Ill give you this life lesson .......free of charge!
Barbecueboy - Ever notice when its time for our new friend to disappear.
Burt from soap used to do that....nut job.
What is there to say in response to "gotcha" questions and a post that is basically a conspiracy theory? Of course I'd pay more in my taxes if the government enacted a new tax, they're taxes, not donations. As for Zero25's post, it sounds reasonably worded on the surface, but boils down to not trusting scientists because of financial motives to create problem, a motive that is present for pretty much any member of the scientific community.
Accusing the entirety of climate experts of lying to benefit themselves financially is in the level of a conspiracy theory. I also wouldn’t pay more than what the government requests, but would still be perfectly fine if they implemented an additional tax in the future.
Like collusion????
Go back and read post #55 and find where it says the entirety of climate experts, whoever the hell they are. No conspiracy is intimated, just stating facts.
I'm not accusing them (the "scientists" who are financially benefitting from attempts to establish global warming theories) of anything more than looking after their own financial and political interests. I'm not sure I wouldn't do the same thing. There is going to be huge money banked in the name of, and reaction to, global warming and these guys are anticipating cashing in. Whether it be through grants to their department within the indoctrination center they are affiliated with or being directly invested in a company whose basis for profit is global warming. Hell, can't blame some egg headed university researcher for cashing in, can ya'? LOL!
To address the original premise of the thread, here are the facts.
The black community as a whole has a father absence rate of just over 64% and that is a conservative number, to be sure. That rate was 24% in 1965. White father absence has also skyrocketed but not at the rate within the black community.
Without a 2 parent household the percentage of children being raised in poverty explodes regardless of race. This is not conducive to a productive society as a whole.
One of the tenants of the political terrorist organization black lives matter is the abolishment of the nuclear family. Not to mention the advocacy of full blown marxism. A large percentage of urban inbred's espouse to these tenets, whether black, white hispanic or otherwise.
The far left extremists seem to sympathize with, and even encourage, the above tenets and due in large part to the mass indoctrination centers that public, and many private schools have become, the support becomes more prevalent among the urban inbreds every day.
Might I add -
And defying our Blue Lives men and women of authority for almost the past year and a half.
Case in point.
Florida cop attacked by crowd in Jacksonville - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wphpHM306xo&t=149s
Took some time to process these posts. I do agree on some level that the issue of fatherless children is a very big problem, but poverty for a community/demographic can be extremely hard to get out of for any race, especially without government intervention/aid. These kinds of issues happen in every country's lower classes and those lower classes can take decades to climb out of the hole. In America, black people spent over 80% of America's history forced to the bottom rungs of society over their race. The issues in these communities are only caused by their race because society pushed them down due to their race. They are not genetically destined to live this way like NA likes to say, they are living the product of generations of oppression and need assistance to get out of the cycle their families were forced into, just like any other family living in poverty.
As for the EV stuff, one can be interested in the future of US infrastructure without personally funding it. As for anti-police sentiment, people have despised police since the modern form was created. This recent wave isn't unique
I don't think anyone disagrees with you on the helping hand to those that need the help. But to say that they were pushed to the bottom rungs of society for 80% of Americas existence is hogwash.
I agree with a lot of that above post , but at some point everything has to stop being " all whiteys fault"and people need to take responsibility for what they are doing now, not keep bringing up what my great, great grandfather said to a member of their family 80 years ago.
I'm sorry for what he may have said or did, but he's dead....and I wasn't around back then, don't fuking try and make me feel guilty for something I didn't do and wouldn't do now is the way I feel about all of it......I give every man and woman I come across my respect until I'm given a reason not to, skin color means zero.
The severity of it is.
And nobody is blind to the fact that a lot has anti police stuff has been self inflicted by idiots in the ranks, everyone gets that.......doesn't mean the overwhelming majority that aren't a bag of diks has to pay the price though.
Defund the police they said, lol
Father absence and poverty go very much hand in hand regardless of race.
I do agree that too many people focus on those that did terrible things generations ago. My 80% estimate is honestly conservative though. I reached that number by taking the age of the US (not including colonial times, so 1776-2021) and took the year 1969 as a time where I feel a lot of people act like racism died out. That is 193 out of the 245 years the US has existed where black people were either enslaved or legally segregated and explicitly discriminated against as a matter or general policy. That's not a part of me saying all whites suck, but that the black population spent generations pushed down by white people at the time. Irish people despised (despise?) British people for what their government did to Ireland in the past, the only difference is that the groups hate/hated each other based on location, not race.
That estimate is conservative to me as it would need to assume that everything racially wrong with the US died after the Civil Rights Movement, which it didn't.