BBQ, Rumor has it that your lovely wife is working with AI to produce a better barbecue wagon to replace you.
Printable View
BBQ, Rumor has it that your lovely wife is working with AI to produce a better barbecue wagon to replace you.
Buford, I'll keep using AI as a source of information and you can keep using Truth Social as your source of information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxEnlUXGp5g
"artificial".........kinda ironic coming from a union guy!
ss you have gone bonkers. A-I could be a great thing, but it is politically controlled and also owned by leftist the agendas, tthat are proven to be dishonest.
Now you are backing up your posts with A-I based answers, nobody with any intelligence would honestly turn to or rely on, in the real world.
Maybe you need to go to your island an let your A-I do all of your posting and propaganda.
Are you scheduled for any brain implants yet, BTW????
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/20/tech/...usk/index.html
The terrors of technology are coming.
These Trump hating people vote for democrats.
Fixed it for ya!
Now you are telling us that Democrat people are smarter and superior???? This makes you look anything but superior.
No no, as a said above rich elites have the money to get an advantage, and the high IQ's were probably stolen or bought from the true intelligent people that created I-A. And I would say that would not include very many Democrats, because you just can't be truly smart and superior over anyone, by voting for Democrats.
Your "illusions of grandeur" are so laughable and your IQ is too. :)
But you did finally admit, they are stealing elections. So this is for you!!!
https://blog.gainapp.com/wp-content/...apping-Gif.gif
Generated via AI:
Title: Dispelling the Myth: The 2020 Election Was Not Stolen
In the wake of the 2020 United States presidential election, a narrative emerged and gained traction among some segments of the population: the belief that the election was stolen. This narrative has been particularly prevalent among individuals on the far right of the political spectrum. However, it is essential to address this misconception and provide a clear and evidence-based explanation as to why the 2020 election was not stolen.
The Legal Landscape: One of the fundamental aspects of democratic societies is the rule of law. The 2020 election underwent rigorous legal scrutiny, with numerous lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign and its allies. However, the overwhelming majority of these legal challenges were dismissed by state and federal courts due to lack of evidence or merit. In some instances, judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican administrations ruled against these claims. This underscores the integrity of the legal process and demonstrates that the allegations of widespread fraud lacked credible evidence.
Bipartisan Oversight: Elections in the United States are not conducted in isolation but are subject to extensive oversight from both major political parties. In 2020, Republican and Democratic election officials, along with thousands of poll workers and volunteers from diverse political backgrounds, oversaw the electoral process. The Department of Homeland Security described the 2020 election as "the most secure in American history." Assertions of widespread fraud are not only unfounded but also disregard the bipartisan efforts to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
Independent Audits and Recounts: Following the election, several states conducted audits, recounts, and canvassing processes to verify the accuracy of the results. These efforts, often initiated by state laws or at the request of candidates, reaffirmed the outcome of the election. In Georgia, for example, a hand recount of nearly 5 million ballots confirmed Joe Biden's victory, with only minor discrepancies found. Similar recounts and audits in other battleground states yielded consistent results, further debunking claims of widespread fraud.
Cybersecurity Measures: Concerns about foreign interference and cybersecurity threats were prevalent leading up to the 2020 election. However, federal and state agencies, along with private cybersecurity firms, implemented robust measures to safeguard the integrity of the electoral infrastructure. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) described the election as "the most secure in American history" and refuted claims of widespread voter fraud or manipulation. These assurances from experts in the field underscore the credibility of the electoral process.
Respect for Democratic Norms: Central to the functioning of any democracy is the peaceful transfer of power based on the will of the electorate. Despite the contentious nature of the 2020 election, key institutions, including the judiciary, state legislatures, and Congress, upheld the rule of law and affirmed the outcome of the electoral college. Former President Donald Trump's own attorney general, William Barr, stated that the Department of Justice found no evidence of widespread fraud that would have altered the outcome of the election. It is imperative to respect the democratic norms and institutions that underpin the electoral process, even in the face of political disagreement.
In conclusion, the assertion that the 2020 election was stolen lacks credibility and is contradicted by a wealth of evidence and expert opinion. The democratic process prevailed, with millions of Americans exercising their right to vote and electing their representatives. While political divisions may persist, it is crucial to confront misinformation and baseless claims to safeguard the integrity of democracy. Moving forward, it is incumbent upon all citizens, regardless of political affiliation, to uphold the principles of fairness, transparency, and respect for the rule of law in future elections.
Title: Dispelling the Myth: The 2020 Election Was Not Stolen
In the wake of the 2020 United States presidential election, a narrative emerged and gained traction among some segments of the population: the belief that the election was stolen. This narrative has been particularly prevalent among individuals on the far right of the political spectrum. However, it is essential to address this misconception and provide a clear and evidence-based explanation as to why the 2020 election was not stolen.
The Legal Landscape: One of the fundamental aspects of democratic societies is the rule of law. The 2020 election underwent rigorous legal scrutiny, with numerous lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign and its allies. However, the overwhelming majority of these legal challenges were dismissed by state and federal courts due to lack of evidence or merit. In some instances, judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican administrations ruled against these claims. This underscores the integrity of the legal process and demonstrates that the allegations of widespread fraud lacked credible evidence.
Bipartisan Oversight: Elections in the United States are not conducted in isolation but are subject to extensive oversight from both major political parties. In 2020, Republican and Democratic election officials, along with thousands of poll workers and volunteers from diverse political backgrounds, oversaw the electoral process. The Department of Homeland Security described the 2020 election as "the most secure in American history." Assertions of widespread fraud are not only unfounded but also disregard the bipartisan efforts to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
Independent Audits and Recounts: Following the election, several states conducted audits, recounts, and canvassing processes to verify the accuracy of the results. These efforts, often initiated by state laws or at the request of candidates, reaffirmed the outcome of the election. In Georgia, for example, a hand recount of nearly 5 million ballots confirmed Joe Biden's victory, with only minor discrepancies found. Similar recounts and audits in other battleground states yielded consistent results, further debunking claims of widespread fraud.
Cybersecurity Measures: Concerns about foreign interference and cybersecurity threats were prevalent leading up to the 2020 election. However, federal and state agencies, along with private cybersecurity firms, implemented robust measures to safeguard the integrity of the electoral infrastructure. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) described the election as "the most secure in American history" and refuted claims of widespread voter fraud or manipulation. These assurances from experts in the field underscore the credibility of the electoral process.
Respect for Democratic Norms: Central to the functioning of any democracy is the peaceful transfer of power based on the will of the electorate. Despite the contentious nature of the 2020 election, key institutions, including the judiciary, state legislatures, and Congress, upheld the rule of law and affirmed the outcome of the electoral college. Former President Donald Trump's own attorney general, William Barr, stated that the Department of Justice found no evidence of widespread fraud that would have altered the outcome of the election. It is imperative to respect the democratic norms and institutions that underpin the electoral process, even in the face of political disagreement.
In conclusion, the assertion that the 2020 election was stolen lacks credibility and is contradicted by a wealth of evidence and expert opinion. The democratic process prevailed, with millions of Americans exercising their right to vote and electing their representatives. While political divisions may persist, it is crucial to confront misinformation and baseless claims to safeguard the integrity of democracy. Moving forward, it is incumbent upon all citizens, regardless of political affiliation, to uphold the principles of fairness, transparency, and respect for the rule of law in future elections.
The bottom of your feet and the palms of your hands are not tanned sir…..why you embellish so much? Or is that AI too?
You didn't put a "disinformation" warning on your post. But of course people know trash when they read it. hahahaaha
Seriously though, this A-I being used with such dishonesty and just plain lies, is dangerous to society. Our citizens should not be subjected to such false info, even in the name of A-I. There are going to be people getting fooled and deceived by such a tool. Nothing intelligent about that ss.
The bottom of your feet and the palms of your hands are not tanned sir…..why you embellish so much? Or is that AI too?
Wasnt he a proud member of the BR549 Garbage Picker Upper Union?.........Or, was that artificial too?
Zero, Junior Samples would make a spittoon out of ss!! :)
Lulu too! :)
Generated via AI:
Insults, those sharp-edged verbal arrows, have a fascinating psychology behind them. Let’s delve into why they’re flung around and what drives people to use them:
Status and Anger:
Insults often stem from anger related to status insecurity. Imagine a chicken pecking order: the bottom chicken gets pecked by everyone else, while the top chicken remains unscathed. In our human society, physical aggression is less common, so we resort to verbal interactions.
When someone insults another, it’s an attempt to lower the recipient’s social status and elevate their own.
Many insults are reactive, triggered by real or perceived slights—like someone cutting in line accidentally1.
Content of Insults:
Insults aim to diminish someone in the imaginary status hierarchy.
Common themes include:
Social Status: References to ancestry, lack of prestige, or membership in despised out-groups.
Sexuality: Often featuring sexual components or alluding to sexual organs.
Shame: Mentioning unappealing traits like fatness, shortness, baldness, or contagious diseases.
Intelligence: Questioning mental competence; recipients are invariably labeled as “stupid” or "crazy"1.
Narcissism and Social Media:
Our era is marked by heightened concern about how we’re perceived by others.
Social media amplifies this, where constant evaluation encourages ego inflation at the expense of others.
Insecure individuals may lash out online, enjoying the freedom from real-world reprisals1.
Diogenes’ Wisdom:
Diogenes wisely said, “An insult dishonors the one who utters it, not the one who receives it.”
So, perhaps hurling insults reveals immaturity and a lack of valid arguments more than anything else2.
Remember, the power lies in rising above insults, not in trading them.
SS rolling in with someone else’s thoughts as an answer??? Didn’t see that one coming.
Wonder what AI would say if you asked it about plagiarism and it’s over use?
BBQ, it’s essential to recognize that AI-generated content is technically not plagiarism. Plagiarism involves copying someone else’s ideas or words and presenting them as one’s own. AI-generated content doesn’t fit this definition, as it originates from algorithms rather than human authors.
Generated by AI
BBQ, can you please give me the human author of the above post?
You lie to fit your narrative, and its all bull$hit.
Quote:
Is artificial intelligence considered plagiarism?
artificial intelligence plagiarism - https://www.google.com/search?sca_es...loom-srp.1.0l5Quote:
Doing academic work requires that the work you turn in is your own. A paper that is written by AI is not considered your own original work. It doesn't matter which AI program/software you use. Using any of these to write your papers is considered a form of plagiarism.
Is Using AI Content Plagiarism? - https://www.quetext.com/blog/is-usin...ent-plagiarism
A growing concern is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots to write entire essays and articles. While it may be tempting to use AI in this way, please be aware that this is also considered a form of plagiarism. - https://libguides.sjsu.edu/c.php?g=436654&p=9517043Quote:
However, if the AI writer searches for existing content on the web and then uses paraphrasing to generate unique content when you run it through a plagiarism detector, so it doesn’t get flagged as duplicate content, that would be considered plagiarized content.
It can be challenging to know if a random AI tool generates content from scratch or paraphrases existing content without further research into how the tool works.
If the latter, you would be held responsible for the plagiarism, not the tool creators, as they simply provide a rewriting tool for you. When using information from any source, quoting when paraphrasing is essential. Thus, random AI writing tools carry an inherent risk of AI plagiarism.
I can cut and paste everything AI that you’ve posted so far, plug it into a search engine, and it will pop up as someone else’s work, paraphrased or complete context, linked to some form of existing web link address.
But you already knew that, and so did most everyone reading this.
Lurker thanks for the information. This is what I got from your information.
AI Content and Plagiarism
Since artificial intelligence tools generate unique content from scratch instead of stealing someone's ideas, using an AI tool isn't technically plagiarism, unlike copy-paste plagiarism.
Lurker, is AI going to be a person too, just like corporations are people too? They are going to be fighting wars for us, shouldn't they be able to vote?
You only post the parts that fit your narrative. Plain and simple, what you are doing is a form of plagiarism. You know it, I know it, and everyone reading this knows it.
Cheating is all you know, thanks to your Union work non-ethics.
Lurker, Let me get this straight what we post on here is now considered academic work? This is from your post above.
Yes, using artificial intelligence (AI) to write academic work is considered plagiarism. AI tools generate unique content from scratch, so using AI to write papers is taking credit for a creation you did not create.
Lurker, you can jump up and down scream and shout all you want, but as long as I identify my source of information there is nothing you can debate about. As long as I post: "Generated by AI" there is nothing wrong with it. There is nothing wrong with me copy and paste another article and post the link. You post 3 links in your post 102. Why is mine different?
Like the tire rule debacle…..his comments will never meet the benchmark if you don’t know what the benchmark is?
SS, why so hard to just answer the man’s question of what was the question exactly how you asked it?
Fits the old early computer nerd explanation of bad results using the garbage in, garbage out analogy.
Barbecueboy,
The way you ask a question to AI is most important --- As it can sway the answer with bias one way or another. Reading ss12’s AI posted answers thus far, then plugging those answers to a search engine and getting the results --- it is quite obvious that ss12’s question(s) are/is biased to fit his narrative from the get go. Added, I’ve plugged in ALL of his AI answers thus far, and EVERYONE of them is in some form or another, verbatim or paraphrased, comes from someone else’s work. Thus like the Union “indoctrinated” guy that he is, he’s stealing from others hard work and research.
Think about that one for a moment. He’s outright stealing and he knows it, but chooses to do it any way. That my friend tells all of US a lot about his character, morals, and ethics.
AI Bias - What Is It and How to Avoid It? - https://levity.ai/blog/ai-bias-how-to-avoid
Quote:
----- An Artificial Intelligence system is only as good as the quality of the data it receives as input. Suppose you can clear your training dataset of conscious and unconscious preconceptions about race, gender, and other ideological notions. In that case, you will be able to create an artificial intelligence system that makes data-driven judgments that are impartial.
However, in the actual world, we know this is unlikely. AI is determined by the data it’s given and learns from. Humans are the ones who generate the data that AI uses. There are many human prejudices, and the continuous discovery of new biases increases the overall number of biases regularly. As a result, it is conceivable that an entirely impartial human mind, as well as an AI system, will never be achieved. After all, people are the ones who generate the skewed data, and humans and human-made algorithms are the ones who verify the data to detect and correct biases.
Artificial Intelligence Can Be Biased. Here’s What You Should Know. - https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/a...u-should-know/
Gentleman you might as well get use to AI its not going anywhere soon. Now all you got that it's bias but it's all in how you ask the question. Isn't Fox's news bias, isn't CNN bias. You will have bias wherever you go. Aren't most of your post bias against mine? When you go and research a topic the information you gather can't that make you bias one way or another? So, you can be bias, but I can't? AI is being taught in grade school right now. My 10-year-old grandson has been using AI in a computer class in school.
so it’s all in how you ask the question? Like in real life and stuff?? Some of us don’t need to be artificially intelligent to give the correct answer.
But considering your past and being told what to think and do……I understand.
I remember when myspace first came out too.
So you would like AI units or whatever you want to call them to have human rights and voting rights? Sir, you are too far down the rabbit hole.
As you stated in one of your posts above the left does cheat in the voting process. So now you want to allow them to create machines with voting rights? How many new machines do they need to build just to win elections?
None of us know what's going to happen but pushing this A-I upon us is wrong and just another tool of evil, is what it could become.
A-I is dangerous, because of the corruption in our society.