I normally don't, but the title to that one was too ridiculous.
Printable View
I normally don't, but the title to that one was too ridiculous.
1) selective, as per your normal
2) so you went in prejudiced
And I’m the one that needs to rethink “critical thinking”
No amount of open mind will make that believable.
There are way to many 2020 voter discrepancy algorithm like and kind videos out there that ALL come to the same conclusion ---- for ALL of them to be wrong. All that I’ve seen come to the same conclusion. In short, you’re saying all of the computer scientists, mathematicians, and so forth, are wrong --- and you are right. Sorry, mcarter815, I’m not buying what you’re selling.
Mr Haney......remember?
And fwiw, I'm trying to divest myself of things that need to be critically thought about so much anyway.....it's overrated.
Said the man that cornered his fellow Iowans sanitizer and toilet paper market bout this same time last year....shake the etch a sketch bro,your screen is full of it again.
Pesky facts ...........
Please step forward you wokers that claimed the cop was killed by a Trumper with a fire extinguisher.
And receive your Retard Awards!!!
https://media1.tenor.com/images/fe37...temid=13936491