Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1

    Default Widening Metric front end

    Are there any other lower a arms that will fit a g-body metric car to widen the front end other than the early novas. I have a ton of 5 1/2 front spring and dont really want to buy all new 5". Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    844

    Default

    There is a Ford crown vic that fits not sure years. Maybe lengthen the metric lowers?
    Josh K.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,388

    Default Camaro

    70-81 Camaro lowers will bolt right on.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,224

    Default

    both of these last two guys are posting wrong info.

    the ford go on the camaro clip or full size

    metric uses the early nova stuff its not a bolt on job tons to change

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    colchester il.
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    the ford crown vic lower can be made to work but you have to cut off the lower rear frame mount and move it about 3/4 of an inch.the same for the camaro lower's it take work but it can be done. the nova lowers also lengthen the wheel base because you have the put them on backwards to make them work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    844

    Default

    Impala spindles arn't a bolt on either...I wouldn't do it to much work.
    Josh K.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    288

    Default

    I have been thinking about building a new metric car, but taking the bare frame and cutting it down the middle and widening the crossmembers and centerlink has anyone ever done that?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,238

    Default

    why dont ya just run a shallow'er wheel off set,...going from a 4'' to a 2'' youll be 4 inches wider....spacers can work too....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    288

    Default

    My reasoning for widening the frame is to put the springs farther apart. I think it would make the car more stable and predictable.

  10. #10

    Default

    1982 and newer camaro will bolt right up . i think they are longer than the g body metric.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,238

    Default

    82 an up are strut cars,...will that work with coil springs???

    if you want wider springs why not go with a chevelle or camaro clip???

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    288

    Default

    Yea but the way I am thinking about doing it, I can go ahead and make it a little wider that the older frame.

  13. #13

    Default

    that is cheating and shouldnt be done !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    288

    Default

    My tracks rules say NOTHING about widening the frame and all my suspension mounts would still be in the same place. What about people moving the top a-frame mounts? That is done ALL over the country!! You will be hard pressed to find a front running car that hasn't had the top a frame mounts moved or the a frames themselves lenthened or shortened!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    509

    Default

    I had a metric modified that I cut the a arm at the bushing then took a second a arm and cut about an inch or 2 from the bushing and welded that piece on the first a arm.Welded my wieght jack where it fit the spring.You want the tallest lower balljiont in it, moog 727 If I remember right

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirty white boy View Post
    82 an up are strut cars,...will that work with coil springs???

    if you want wider springs why not go with a chevelle or camaro clip???
    The 82 up Camaro does have a strut, but it does not have the spring on the strut. The spring is in the conventional location. I have never thought of this, but You might want to investigate it some. Surely you know someone with that body style Camaro that you could compare too. I may check into this myself.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,238

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tutt71 View Post
    The 82 up Camaro does have a strut, but it does not have the spring on the strut. The spring is in the conventional location. I have never thought of this, but You might want to investigate it some. Surely you know someone with that body style Camaro that you could compare too. I may check into this myself.
    yeah,..i got a 86 z28 under the shed,..an a mid 70s camaro clip under race car beside it,...ant did nuttun to the 86 since i drug it home...

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Did anyone find out if the 82 Camaro lower a frames would fit on a metric car without having to cut anything ?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    473

    Default

    widening the frame is by far the easiest way of accomplishing your goal . but it's not legal in u.m.p racing . although their are a few cars out there that finished high in the point standings (from my area) that have that alteration in them . it works ! and so far ...... u.m.p don't seem to mind . lol .
    alot of cars have the nova lowers also . and i think that is ellegal as well . i prefer the camaro . it comes wider from the factory . and usually wider is better .
    BUMPERS ARE FOR BLOCKERS !

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    104

    Default

    There are also a lot of cars that work fine without going to the extreme of widening them out. JMO

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.