Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    116

    Default fluid dampner on circle track engine

    i have a new engine going together ati rattler is bad engine builder wants to replace it with fluid dampner? it has all light rotating ass. callies xls magnum crank and billet rods. what dampner would you use.

  2. #2

    Default

    ATI all the way!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    844

    Default

    NO FLUID dampner. Agreed ATI super dampner, too much money on the internals to put a junk balancer on it..
    Josh K.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Winchester,TN
    Posts
    227

    Default

    TCI makes the Rattler F ..ATI makes the Super Dampner A+

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tulsa america
    Posts
    2,686

    Default

    yeah the rattler is junk. it broke the snout off a good callies piece we had. Couldnt convince the driver not to put it on when the old ati had problems he found out how expensive a new crank was.

    Anything that is supposed to be balance as closely as a rotating assemble is should not have something boucing around in it JMO JMO

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mendenhall MS
    Posts
    543

    Default

    Bingo.
    The Fluid Damper, Rattler, and Gap-Less rings, all work better on paper, than in the real world.TB

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rutherfordton N.C.
    Posts
    1,503

    Default

    I agree with T.B. 100% Bill
    Hendren Racing Engines
    1310 U.S. Hwy 221 North
    Rutherfordton North Carolina 28139
    828-286-0780
    www.hendrensracingengines.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    116

    Default

    so Bill Hendrens what would you put on it callies magnum xls 36lbs crank and lunatti billet rods and j&e pistons. also small bert fly wheel if that makes any differnce

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rutherfordton N.C.
    Posts
    1,503

    Default

    We would use the ATI its the best out there.Bill
    Hendren Racing Engines
    1310 U.S. Hwy 221 North
    Rutherfordton North Carolina 28139
    828-286-0780
    www.hendrensracingengines.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    509

    Default

    Had an imca late model motor on the dyno with a litewieght 283 balancer on it.Tried a ATI balancer,it was close but the ATI lost 2hp.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    844

    Default

    Never see or feel 2hp on the track (was this consistant or just a one pull comparison, by the way? ) I am sure the crank would be happier with the ATI super dampner.
    Josh K.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RCJ View Post
    Had an imca late model motor on the dyno with a litewieght 283 balancer on it.Tried a ATI balancer,it was close but the ATI lost 2hp.
    Did you use a light weight ATI so you were comparing apples to apples or did you compare a light 283 and a standard weight ATI?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    509

    Default

    I didn't write the wieghts down,I think it was just under 5lbs for the 283,around 8 for the ati.Any changes that didn't go as planned we made second pulls on, the results never changed.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.