Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    central pa
    Posts
    37

    Default lf shock and spring question

    our team seams to ignore the lf of our car..meaning we neve adjust on this area
    of the chassis..

    i see some mounting shock in the inside hole and some the outside upper hole..what is gained by moving shock in or out.

    will increasing compression and decreasing rebound help keep car on the rf?
    thanks in advance for any help on this subject guys

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    if you run more rebound and or less compression in the lf it seems to help the car rotate in the center and not be so throttle tight......ive had a tie down on my lf for the last half of the year and really liked it.....how many of you guys are doin this too, or am i nuts

    oh and not sure on mounting location it probably holds the car off that corner or lets it fall on it more depending on which hole its in

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 51rocket51 View Post
    our team seams to ignore the lf of our car..meaning we neve adjust on this area
    of the chassis..

    i see some mounting shock in the inside hole and some the outside upper hole..what is gained by moving shock in or out.

    will increasing compression and decreasing rebound help keep car on the rf?
    thanks in advance for any help on this subject guys
    Changing the mounting location of the coil-over changes the spring rate at that corner. Leaning it in makes it softer, leaning it out makes it stiffer. As far as the other fellows input on tieing down the LF, that would seem to be counter productive to turning the center better since it would tend to lift or carry the LF and not let it help turn the car. JMO
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    151

    Default

    if you are not hiking the LF off the ground would it not make sense to use a chain there adjusted to be at length just before the shock is fully extended, thus saving some wear and tear on the shock being fully extended abruptly.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poppy View Post
    if you are not hiking the LF off the ground would it not make sense to use a chain there adjusted to be at length just before the shock is fully extended, thus saving some wear and tear on the shock being fully extended abruptly.
    If you are not hiking it off the ground, why would you need a chain limiter? Unlike the LR, the LF isn't being forcibly extended by axle thrust. The only thing working on the Lf is gravity and what ever energy is in the spring, but if its not lifting off the ground then its not necessary, just et the shock and spring do there intended jobs. JMO
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Thanks for the info, kind of clears that up.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    tieing the left front down lets the rr lift when on the gas, that makes rr drive and frees the car up from center off, that was my reasoning for that, but theres a million different results for every adjustment, so theres prolly more to it then just that

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by junebug View Post
    tieing the left front down lets the rr lift when on the gas, that makes rr drive and frees the car up from center off, that was my reasoning for that, but theres a million different results for every adjustment, so theres prolly more to it then just that
    So your saying your RR lifts under accel, even with all the G's going toward the RR.... I'd have to see that in action, it kinda defies physics. To each his own I guess.
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    there are some rear suspension videos on youtube....watch wat the rr does, it drops on entry til u pick up the gas then lifts once your on the throttle

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    773

    Default

    the rr can lift quite a bit even coming un seated from the coil over kit.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65hOTt4EDvA

    heres a video that kinda shows it, watch which direction the birdcages indexes....it moves away from rr spring the majority of the time

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by junebug View Post
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65hOTt4EDvA

    heres a video that kinda shows it, watch which direction the birdcages indexes....it moves away from rr spring the majority of the time
    Whoever is driving that car isn't setting it into the corner so when they come off, the bars are at static (ride height) levels so sure there is going to be thrust on the RR. So bad example.
    Anyway, here's my opinion on LF shock: By increasing compression on the LF shock you are slowing down weight transfer to that corner under braking which should help the car turn due to the increase in RF weight (it has to go somewhere) as weight moves forward. Decreasing compression on the LF shock will allow weight to transfer to that corner faster which will "de-wedge" the car and make it tighter on corner entry.
    LF shock is a fine tuning thing if you ask me compared to spring rate. LF spring rate is one of the few things you can change that will effect entry and have little to no effect on exit. My 2 cents...take it for what it's worth.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    shouldnt weight coming off the rr free up entry ?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    If the car is lifting the RR on accel I'd bet it's more a side effect of the axle thrust in the LR pinning the RF and subsequently lifting the rear of the car and the 5th coil only amps the problem. Just my 2 cents, but a setup like this probably isn't balanced or as fast as it could be. I've seen some cars lift the entire rear of the car on exit, but they were never fast. To each his own, but this sounds like a 3 wheel setup and 4 are always faster in my view.
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    not only is liftin the rr not a 3 wheeling setup it drives the lf down......if you put lot of angle in the rr upper it makes lift, just like the lr does, when the rr lifts it drives the lf into the ground more than if the car was falling over onto the rr....so its kind of the anti 3 wheeling setup

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by junebug View Post
    not only is liftin the rr not a 3 wheeling setup it drives the lf down......if you put lot of angle in the rr upper it makes lift, just like the lr does, when the rr lifts it drives the lf into the ground more than if the car was falling over onto the rr....so its kind of the anti 3 wheeling setup
    I see. Still unclear, if your using bar angle to lift the RR, then why tie down the LF? Good luck.
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    363

    Default

    keeps car off rr on entry and lets it keep more of a static type attitude......so the car doesnt go through 4-5 inchs of travel.....it basically gets a certain attude and keep it all the way around the track......tryin to keep rr from falling down so fast on entry basically

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by junebug View Post
    shouldnt weight coming off the rr free up entry ?
    Yes but where did I say that it wouldn't?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.