Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    420

    Default Sprint Injection on Late Models

    Is there a reason why this wouldn't work? Everybody keeps talking about the future of racing being EFI but I can't figure out why we couldn't run mechanical fuel injection like sprint cars. Would it not be just as effective? I think it would be better because you eliminate the possiblity of teams cheating up electronics at a ridiculous cost to conceal.

    I'm just thinking out loud here but I would love to hear some opinions from people who have experience or knowledge of how the sprint injection sytems work.

    I just don't feel like EFI has a place in certain areas of racing. I am all for advancement and technology that will make racing more enviromentally friendly and all that but I think we should give some serious thought as to the type of tech that we let into our sport.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    I'd say the main reason nobody has messed with it is because it's against the rules. I've read a lot of rule books and I've yet to see one for Late Models that didn't say that the motor has to be "naturally aspirated". They usually go on to say, in plain English, "no fuel injection".

  3. #3

    Default mechanical

    Its a mechanical fuel injection with single port injections. Most classes give some kind of spec carb. I don't know if there is a difference on the mechanical fuel injection they run on hot rods and the sprint car but one is for gas and other for methanol. But i would sure love to see on a dyno.

    But the think the makes sprint engine unique is they dont have starts, or fans plus the power steering is run of the back of the cam same with the fuel pump. Its just raw power.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Where the fuel pump and power steering pump is mounted doesn't have any effect on power output. Google "law of conservation of energy" and get a quick physics lesson. The only reason they mount everything to the back is to assist in getting proper weight distribution. Lack of a starter is also not a "power generating" enhancement, it just means they don't have to carry the extra weight. Sprint cars are faster than Late Models because of a higher HP/weight ratio. To surmise that it is "raw power" is to not understand what is going on.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Just to clarify, "naturally aspirated" does has nothing to do with fuel injection. This simply means that the motor uses atmospheric pressure. The alternative to natural aspiration would be forced induction. There are carburated and EFI forced induction engines and viceaversa. Google naturally aspirated.

    In my opinion where the LM rules eliminate fuel injection is by mandating a single four barrel carburetor.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    24

    Default

    We ran kinsler fuel injection on our "outlaw" latemodel through most of the 90's, on alcohol. Didnt really have any problems, except we usually had to prime with gas to get it started when it was cold, otherwise it was pretty easy to flood . once it was warmed up it started just like being on a carb. You had to get used to looking around the stacks coming through the hood!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talclipse View Post
    Just to clarify, "naturally aspirated" does has nothing to do with fuel injection. This simply means that the motor uses atmospheric pressure. The alternative to natural aspiration would be forced induction. There are carburated and EFI forced induction engines and viceaversa. Google naturally aspirated.

    In my opinion where the LM rules eliminate fuel injection is by mandating a single four barrel carburetor.
    Good call.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,238

    Default

    been a few articles bout the benefits of efi on a late model in circle track mag recently,..even ran one against carb'd late models,...hot rod been doing hp articles on efi for years,....yeah its a lil costly but speed cost how fast can you afford to go!!...ant no way a carb can out do a good efi with a computer tune up on it,..these aftermarket stand alone efi computers can figure air to fuel rato's an change them as needed within mila-seconds,..cuss it now but when you get use to it,..i assure you,..youll love it!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirty white boy View Post
    been a few articles bout the benefits of efi on a late model in circle track mag recently,..even ran one against carb'd late models,...hot rod been doing hp articles on efi for years,....yeah its a lil costly but speed cost how fast can you afford to go!!...ant no way a carb can out do a good efi with a computer tune up on it,..these aftermarket stand alone efi computers can figure air to fuel rato's an change them as needed within mila-seconds,..cuss it now but when you get use to it,..i assure you,..youll love it!!!
    You are 100% correct, but it is only as good as the info the sensors are feeding to it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default What benefit would mechanical be over a 4 barrel? Even more unusable power....

    Quote Originally Posted by hardracer32 View Post
    Is there a reason why this wouldn't work? Everybody keeps talking about the future of racing being EFI but I can't figure out why we couldn't run mechanical fuel injection like sprint cars. Would it not be just as effective? I think it would be better because you eliminate the possiblity of teams cheating up electronics at a ridiculous cost to conceal.

    I'm just thinking out loud here but I would love to hear some opinions from people who have experience or knowledge of how the sprint injection sytems work.

    I just don't feel like EFI has a place in certain areas of racing. I am all for advancement and technology that will make racing more enviromentally friendly and all that but I think we should give some serious thought as to the type of tech that we let into our sport.
    Really I don't see a point in going with fuel injection, if your not gonna go EFI. What I mean is, the whole point in going with EFI, is better control of emissions and fuel efficiency. If you went mechanical it would be almost strictly a performance enhancement with a minimal gain in fuel efficiency, but in most cases now we have more HP than we can use. I mean Ronnie Johnson keeps on beating the open cars now with a 540HP engine in the right conditions. I understand wanting to keep out electronics since it opens the door to other things we don't want, like "TC", but it sounds like if we want our sport to grow we may want to consider EFI in some form, but I'm leery of it too... JMO
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    420

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by F22 RAPTOR View Post
    Really I don't see a point in going with fuel injection, if your not gonna go EFI. What I mean is, the whole point in going with EFI, is better control of emissions and fuel efficiency. If you went mechanical it would be almost strictly a performance enhancement with a minimal gain in fuel efficiency, but in most cases now we have more HP than we can use. I mean Ronnie Johnson keeps on beating the open cars now with a 540HP engine in the right conditions. I understand wanting to keep out electronics since it opens the door to other things we don't want, like "TC", but it sounds like if we want our sport to grow we may want to consider EFI in some form, but I'm leery of it too... JMO
    You are the first person to actually address the question I asked. I never said anything about rules. I know the rules concerning carb and fuel injection and pretty much everything else. My question is in regards to the practicality of mechanical injection vs. EFI on Late Models.

    Now that we have that established, let's discuss a little further.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hardracer32 View Post
    Is there a reason why this wouldn't work?
    No it would work, it's just more expensive and can be ornery at times.

    Quote Originally Posted by hardracer32 View Post
    Everybody keeps talking about the future of racing being EFI but I can't figure out why we couldn't run mechanical fuel injection like sprint cars. Would it not be just as effective?
    We could run mechanical, but it wouldn't really be much of a move in the so called, "Green" direction. It would boost power and probably performance, but emission and efficiency benefits would be minimal. Now don't get me wrong, I'm no, Tree hugging/Global warming/Climate change/Green freak, but I do think it would be beneficial to the sport if we had a little more in common with what is being manufactured, at least from a technological standpoint.

    Quote Originally Posted by hardracer32 View Post
    I think it would be better because you eliminate the possiblity of teams cheating up electronics at a ridiculous cost to conceal.
    I share your fears about people manipulating the electronics, but why not let them be adjustable and not worry with it. They have sealed units now that are tamper resistant, but you could make them somewhat tunable I think and it would be no different than tuning your carb. They just need to make sure you can't sneak in TC.

    Quote Originally Posted by hardracer32 View Post
    I'm just thinking out loud here but I would love to hear some opinions from people who have experience or knowledge of how the sprint injection sytems work.
    I have no direct knowledge of sprint/mechanical injection systems. I've only ever seen them on a late model in pictures, but I do know they are pricey in comparison to carbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by hardracer32 View Post
    I just don't feel like EFI has a place in certain areas of racing. I am all for advancement and technology that will make racing more enviromentally friendly and all that but I think we should give some serious thought as to the type of tech that we let into our sport.
    I agree somewhat and share your opinion on being careful of what tech we let in or how its implemented, I mean I wouldn't want to legislate carb companies out in one fell swoop, but I think we could at least look into whats possible without going bananas. JMO
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    colchester il.
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    I remember seeing an artical a few years back in one of the first dirt latemodel magazines.the latemodels out in the north west had the sprint car type fuel injection.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.