Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 70
  1. #41

    Default

    I will dyno it, thanks but I think I'll use a different Dyno, a newer one that can give more data. I know of a few, I"ll ask around.
    Yes my builder gives my engines a leak down every time and they are always good but on occasion he catches something, good point though. I bought a leak down tester from summit or jegs a few years ago, never got it to work or thought I didn't know what I was doing so I gave it to my builder to try and he said it was junk. I'll get a good one and KNOW how to use it. I've been doing Compression tests and they seem worthless to me now.
    You guys have REALLY come through with some very good ideas, I need to go back through every post on this, and print it out. Last night I was eye balling the shaft and saw an area that was rubbed on but not enough to affect speed, but it made me think about the shaft, so I'm going to get it checked and see if its worming around more than my old one, which had NO rub marks where this one did. I'll put the old shaft in for the next race, but first I"ll take them both to see if they match in hardness as they are both suppose to be aquamet 19. I just called marine machining where I got it and I asked what year I bought it, it it was 2008, then there is a possibility of ???
    I will keep you ALL updated, but next race is June 11, and my hull requires a crane to launch.
    I'm not giving up, and yes I've spent enough.
    Rod

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    407

    Default

    The leakdown will also tell you where you are leaking. If the intakes are pounded bad you are losing compression and also getting a bad case of reversion. There has to be a reason for the intakes pounding out,valve train out of control,too soft of a seat, and many other factors. Just about everybody runs a coated titanium intake valve in any serious race engine thats turned more than 8000.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Well dude, I am not sure $100 is enough of a reward...but

    I do know the answer to your problem and have fixed it or worked around it enough to get the lil ole blue ovals back running again. A buddy of mine works for Yates designed those heads about 10 years ago and he is just a regular old dude that has built race engines for about 50 years, and is one of Robert and Doug's right hand guys. Anyway, when they stopped building the heads they put the project in the hands of the Ford engineeers much like they did a couple years ago with the CUP head program.

    What happened? A Ford could not run out of a shower of $hizz...Well of course they totally screwed up 2 great cylinder head programs by making the ports look all pretty and all the engineering numbers look better.

    After 2 years of RYR redesigning stuff and Larry working his magic. Results = Cup heads are fixed...N-Heads are still screwed up. 2 BBL Nascar Late models lost about 50Ft/# or more necessitating a rule change allowing a 500 baseplate on a 350 carb, anyway...

    If you want the problem fixed, you can send me the heads and of course the $100 plus some extra to get the real work done.

    Hit me with an e-mail if you want to get something going I am on a consultiing gig for another week or so and then back in town, anything new is about 4 weeks out.

    Folks on here acuse me of being a name dropper but when you grew up or worked with the folks that did the original work, I don't think that applies. We actually did all of the beta testing out of my Chassis DYno shop and live in race testing at Lanier Raceway when I worked there. The engines that were run were the pre-cursors to the original Ford Crate Engine program. We had a 302" small & big bore and a 357" small and big bore.

    BTW, better be looking for an inertia dyno or you are pi$$ing in the wind bro.

    Later,
    Mark
    Last edited by dynoman14; 05-27-2011 at 02:46 AM. Reason: Spelling

  4. #44
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    west virginia
    Posts
    547

    Default

    useing another dyno might not help you because of the difference in dynos. have seen 70hp diff in 2 different dyno's use the same dyno it was dynoed on and compair.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    The plot thickens....
    "If racing were easy, everybody would do it."

    #77 Leon "Slick" Sells

  6. #46
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Topeka, Kansas
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Just like a train wreck you know whats gonna happen but ya cant look away.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    21

    Default

    I never saw valve spring pressure at max lift. I run around 380lbs on our limited sportsman engines that have flat tappet cams and turn 7500rpm. I wouldnt be so worried about the seat pressure.

  8. #48

    Default Update on Ford N-heads lost acceleration

    Guys, sorry its been a while since my last post. I haven't raced since my last one in early may whwere we still had no acceleration. I found out that the N-head valve seat area is hardened only about .015 deep (I may be off memory there a bit in my number). Anyway it was pretty shallow and after talki9ng with my head guy this explains the "intake seat" beating since that material was probably soft from machining through the hard surface. This would suggest there isn't valve bounce, just beating on a soft seat?
    I spent the last 3 nights up until after midnight on the boat making changes, (like all you have done at one time or another) and getting up early for work, I'm a little foggy but I"m updating results best I can.
    OK, Anyway after a lot of thought, and reading through every post on here, I decided to focus more on the boat and see what the ____ could be wrong, like binding the prop shaft or ???
    My shaft is so loose per my choice and rattles around easily thinking I'd have more speed. My strut bushings are made of an oil impregnated plastic, and I'm told the shaft could rattle/vibrate and creat harminics and slow me down. OK new bushings made yesterday and put in late last night.
    2nd, I put my old shaft back in, 3rd, I changed the way my thrust bracket is braced, even though it was the same when it was fast, I changed it to reflect a more EVEN pressure on brkt itself. I know a hydroplane is a bit polish to this board and I'm rambling a bit, but I want everyone interested in this thread to know I"m trying my VERY HARDEST to get all my power back. I have a good feeling that my changes are good but as for acceleration who the heck knows.
    I will post again later tonight with an address for video streaming for anyone who would like to watch this race on the computer. The last race they streamed on the web sucked according to my Dad, but I"ll post it anyway if I can get it exact so anyone bored over the weekend can check it out.
    As for the guy who mentioned these new N-heads don't flow like the old ones, I"m talking over 100 hp loss, and if you are right? I'll throw my tools all over the place, and flip a coin I hope thats not it. I am a FORD guy, and I think FORD DID do everything to mess these heads up, ok no whining on my part. I"m gonna get after it this weekend after a good nights sleep. I"ll report back.
    I can't thank everyone on this enough. Anyone wanting pictures of the boat, shoot me your e-mail and I"ll gladly share, pretty cool really.
    Rod

  9. #49

    Default No vacumm ?!?!?!?!?! Please read

    We just had a race, out of 5 boats I got lucky and pulled off a 2nd for the weekend, We found something. First of all after the changes I made to the boat, still no acceleration. I was introduced to a Knowledgable Ford guy and I"ll get right to the point. When warming up the engine Sunday AM, he put his hands over my 600 HP carb and said "there is no vacumm here at all". I have been running at 1400 degrees EGT on my left front Cylinder for 2.5 seasons (EGT guage was just calibrated) , he said I"m probably not pulling any fuel in.
    I am getting a vacumm Guage in the next few days and tapping a fitting in (no ports on this 600 HP). 600 HP by rule.
    Dang after all this time could I be THAT low on vacumm? 2 engines? I tested for leaks back in 09 according to my notes. This cam thats currently in now has never gone fast, but in 09 I used the old cam that DID go fast years back and still the same NO acceleration.
    What the heck can cause good dyno pulls and no vacumm at all at 2000 RPM?
    Cam?
    I( will report back asap with vacumm guage results. Where is the best place to tap into the Victor Jr intake? Right into the body part below the carb and spacer? Or on one of the ports?
    Thanks guys, I just can't see this thing leaking, in 2 engines? 2 carbs? 2 different cams? Tried them all.
    I can say that I have been not only running at 1400 exh gas temps, but no matter what my jet size, up to 92! I can't get color on my plugs at all. OR very little,. always looks lean. The guy told I'm NOT pulling fuel into the engine.
    We just ran top end at 7100 RPM, not missing a beat as usual, just no real tq at all. Still no acceleration.
    THANKS!
    Rod

  10. #50

    Default Problem found looks like. NO Vacuum

    At this last weekends race I found I have very low vacuum, I drilled and tapped into the Voctor Jr. Manifold right below the top (.5"). Here are the results.
    Keep in mind my engine won't idle below 2000 RPM thats why I think the leak is below. I did the spray trick all over the carb spacer and intake with WD40 AND starting fluid.
    Its sealed well.
    At 2000 RPM I showed 9 Vacuum.
    2500 RPM 11 Vacuum
    3000 RPM 13 Vacuum
    3500 RPM 15 Vacuum
    4500 RPM 16.5 Vacuum.
    I think its either leaking on the underside of the manifold in the lifter valley, or possibly a cam issue? My spark plugs have always looked lean with no signs of ouil on them, and running a dry sump with a #10 pulling from the lifter valley. If the leak is below through the lifter valley into the intake, wouldn't my plugs show oil on them or something besides a total lean look?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Rod

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    668

    Default

    maybe the motor combo just doesn't like the cam grind that it has?

  12. #52

    Default

    I know this is a possibility, and what really bugs me about this is I put back in the old flat tappet cam to try it a year ago and it did the same thing. Thats why I'm praying its a leak.
    What I"m saying is the bigger cam is a .580 lift after lash, and the smaller one is about a .555 lift after lash. Both about 270 duration at .050 lift. I know theres more to it then those numbers but the bigger cam NEVER went fast although Dynoed better accross the board by about Avg of 20 HP and Tq.
    The smaller cam was a rocket from 2003-2005. Anyway we are running the smaller cam as I"m about to put the fresh engine in after picking it up Saturday. I'm using this current engine now to get all this data, and tonight I will remove the intake looking for an internal vacuum leak. I read where if I just roll the starter over with the throttle plates closed, it should read 3-7 vacuum, if its zero its probably a leak.
    I plan to put the manifold back on with no gasket looking for rocking or using a feeler guage etc. then hopefully measure putty squished by the intake with gasket to see if its not laying flat like it should. Using no gasket though should tell me from what I read.
    Thanks!!! I will report tomorrow or Friday on the intake internal leak.
    Question, my plugs have ALWAYS looked REALLY lean the last 2 years, if its lean, can I STILL be leaking into the intake through from the lifter valley? Keeping oil out but leaking air there? NO signs of oil on the plugs, thats what is killing me, plus my builder is REALLY good about all this.
    I"ll report back, Thanks a million.

  13. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    668

    Default

    with all of your problems you have had maybe you should take this guys way out.....lol

    http://iraffiruse.net/post/490027496

  14. #54

    Default Internal Vaccum leak most likely

    Last night first I turned over the engine with the starter only. I read where it should pull a small amount of vacuum, and if it was Zero it may be an internal leak. It read Zero as I turned the engine over for about 10 seconds.
    I thjen removed the intake, to fine most of the Lower areas of the gasket wet with oil, also this same area on the intake manifold. After cleaning all the gasket material off I put the manifold back on metal to metal I could not tell if it was a bad fit or not. using a straignt edge everything passed, and I put one of those gravity angle finders on all 4 surfaces and all read 45 degrees. I will say though I put a feeler guage and could easily slide .018 under the top part of one bank and bottom of the other.
    I'm going to take a razor blade to all surfaces tonight then with new gaskets from my builder tomorrow I"ll to the putty thickness test using washers the same thickness as the gasket. (Current gaskets are .062
    QUESTION. If there is a gasket problem is the answer to use a thicker gasket? Is .090 or .120 thick ok?
    *** Can I use Silicone of some sort on the entire gasket surface? I know some silicones don't like gas, but for now can I finish my season using a sealer of some sort?
    Bottom line It looks like this is the culprit, but I won't know until I stick the other engine in and get these Gaskets SEALED and run it.
    Thanks guys. I think with all your help we finally found the power loss. VACUUM.
    Rod

  15. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    668

    Default

    when we put our gaskets on, heads and intake, we spray them with this:

    http://www.google.com/products/catal...ed=0CEEQ8wIwBA

    we notice when we had to pull a head off because we dropped a valve a few years ago that the gaskets were all gold. and our motor guy told us that he does it to every motor he builds. anything from a street application to a full race motor. sure gaskets are supposed to do their job, but why not use this too?

  16. #56

    Default Thank you!

    Thanks Rubbin, I've been looking for something that gas won't eat through.

    PERFECT!!
    Rod

  17. #57

    Default I think we have an explanation

    Guys, after 2.5 seasons I think we have found whats been slowing us down.
    Vacuum.... when I first checked vacuum after putting a fitting in my intake, it read 9 inches at 2000 RPM, then 11 at 2500 and 13 at 3000.
    After doubling up my intake gaskets (to .120) using black silicone to glue them together over night with a small amount of weight, I then put those on using that copper sealant, but the paint on stuff with the round ball applicator (like the red form a gasket), that along with using the SPRAY copper sealant on the carb and spacer gaskets, we went to the following. 13 inches of vacuum at 2000 RPM, 15 inches at 1500 and 16 at 3000.
    Keep in mind my cam has a 270 duration at .050 lift so come cams and my head guy said 10 inches of vacuum at 2000 RPM sounded about right, just a foot note.
    Last night I did a leak tesl with a thick alum plate and an air fitting where the carb bolts on and pumped in 10 psi of air. I sprayed soapy water and all the spacer gaskets were leaking except the top one (has the most pressure I assume, and I had this plate tightened down a lot more than my carb. This tells me not to use the copper sealer on the carb gaskets, but it did work well on the (doubled) .120 intake gasket both sides. The intake had good crish on both sides as before using the .060 gasket it had only .005 crush on one side.
    QUESTION, should I use very little silicone on my (cardboard type) carb/spacer gaskets spreading it with my finger thin ... OR ... try the nitrile rubber gaskets and which ones?
    I've read a lot of you racers say any gaskets and do not use sealersealer, well its not an option, it leaks, I watched it. My surfaces are all flat, really. I do use 2 spacers, a 2" 4 into one, and a tapered spacer because the engine is 6.5 degrees in a hydroplane
    Some of you have really stepped up and gave some great advice, I will do my best to get back to you soon and personally thank you.
    My next race is July 9-10, and I'll report what happens.
    Thanks again,
    Rod NM 5

  18. #58
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    632

    Default

    With the engine running, take a bottle of propane with a hose on it and go around the intake gasket and carb spacer, if the rpm's go up, there is your leak.

  19. #59

    Default

    Thanks Dirt,
    I've never tried the propane before, but this time it better not leak as I'm using a thicker gasket (1262R) and sealing my carb gaskets or trying the nitrile rubber ones.
    Anyone have an opinion on the rubber gaskets? I know whats said about the usual paper ones.
    Thanks. Wish I was racing this weekend, but one more week.
    Rod

  20. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    668

    Default

    we use the regular paper type on ours and have no trouble. but i bet the rubber ones would give you a somewhat better seal, as long as you dont squish it to much and cause it to crack/tear. are you using the plastic carb spacers or are the metal ones? we were required by our sanctioning body for a year to switch to plastic spaces if we wanted to run a 2" spacer. we did and found that they warp and squish way to much after heat cycles and were leaking all over with them. so we switched to the 1" metal spacer we were allowed and it worked a ton better.

    in short. get rid of the plastic and go with a metal spacer if at all possible.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.