Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default Twisting drive shafts in two?

    Ok, had this happen twice now, in two weeks...I need answers! *sorry, long post*

    Blew up my 355, put in a 14:1 383, with a 500 cfm carb. Had a 6.33 gear, car weighed 3504 pound. First night out ran great, stupid amounts of power.

    Second night out, put about 53% wedge into the car, and 140-150 lbs of LR bite...she had some NASTY traction. I could just bury the throttle about halfway through, was carrying the LF half the time. Last lap of the heat...rear end BLEW...UP right at 6900 rpm. Broke the driveshaft. I pulled handfulls of pieces out of the housing...it was dead.

    I ordered a new driveshaft from southwest speed, borrowed a set of 6.20 gears, checked for binding, clearance...everything I could think of....and went racing the next saturday.

    Made it through the heat race, but had a slight vibration start on the last lap at about 6600. All bolts were tight so we went back out. Hooked HARD the first lap of the feature, then at the end of the front stretch at lap 2 it chucked the driveshaft at about 6400.

    Now, my confusion. It looks like the driveshaft was held on one end, then twisted and pulled down until it was two pieces.

    A few old racers said its not possible...at all! But is it possible with this big engine, a really good hooking set up and a car that weights 3504 pounds to twist a driveshaft in two?

    please give me some input!
    2010 Dirtona Speedway IMCA Stock Track Champion

    AMSoil Dealer, beckett.roy@gmail.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lock Haven, Pa
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Sounds to me like your gaining too much pinion angle or something. I don't have any experience with a car that weighs that much, but, I have used Southwest Speed driveshafts for the past couple of years and had 600 + horsepower and never had a problem.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    193

    Default

    We had a similar issue to start the year. We put in a new rearend after about 5 years. Went out and broke driveshaft in two on the first nite.I finally traced everything that i had changed, and it ended up that i had bought a new yoke that was 1.5" longer. It fit fine on the rack, but it was to long and was causing the driveshafts to break. I dont think you are breaking them because of power. I dragrace a 3835 lb buick, and it dynos at 744 hp and 669 lbs tq, and i launch it with slicks and it has alot lower gear than you are running. I have never broken the driveshaft in it.Just have heavy duty u joints.I would make sure your fdriveshaft isnt to long. Good luck and keep us posted.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    114

    Default

    if you are running trans mount make sure it is solid or at least polly type mount.I had a stock mount in street car once that had enough movement it would get the driveshaft wipping and do just what you are seeing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Solid mount on the trans.

    When the new one was put in I let the rear shocks loose, and run the car through all the suspension travel it would see, and saw nothing binding up.


    Could I just of got a funk driveshaft?
    2010 Dirtona Speedway IMCA Stock Track Champion

    AMSoil Dealer, beckett.roy@gmail.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Check for anything that it could be hitting. Remember your chassis is NOT rigid and is twisting and if you are lifting the LF something may be getting close enough to hit the shaft. I never had ANY luck running a solid trans mount, broke the trans or drive shaft in every car that had one. The Factory chassis can not be built rigid enough to keep it from twisting. If your car is twisting enough the front could be twisting down and away toward the LF adding a large amount of drive shaft angle.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Bakersfield,Ca
    Posts
    566

    Default

    Urethane trans mount , it's the best of both steel and rubber.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Car is build super rigid, LOTS of bracing and X's underneath the floor pans.

    We were running with some 2970-ish pound cars, with one that weighs 3504. Thats a lot of weight to be moving on the same stuff the people that weigh 500+ pounds less.
    2010 Dirtona Speedway IMCA Stock Track Champion

    AMSoil Dealer, beckett.roy@gmail.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    If you are using ANY part of a production chassis it is not rigid and if the chassis was solid rigid, get rid of it before you die in a wreck as a proper built car is supposed to flex and give to allow the car to absorb impact and not kill the driver. Not to mention that the more rigid the chassis the more precise the setup has to be for EVERY track condition. This is why late models are designed to flex, if not you could never keep up with chassis adjustments during a race much less a weekend. I agree on the urethane mount.
    Last edited by Egoracing; 09-25-2011 at 04:49 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cochran, GA
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Egoracing View Post
    If you are using ANY part of a production chassis it is not rigid and if the chassis was solid rigid, get rid of it before you die in a wreck as a proper built car is supposed to flex and give to allow the car to absorb impact and not kill the driver. Not to mention that the more rigid the chassis the more precise the setup has to be for EVERY track condition. This is why late models are designed to flex, if not you could never keep up with chassis adjustments during a race much less a weekend. I agree on the urethane mount.
    That is some serious bullshiot right there.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carowner73 View Post
    That is some serious bullshiot right there.
    Please explain.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,690

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carowner73 View Post
    That is some serious bullshiot right there.
    I agree with ego on this one, you want the chassis to have some give to it. Build it solid in the 4 point area of the cage (in case of a rollover), but IMO the front & rear of the car should be built (braced) to take a 'moderate' hit, otherwise you can snap your neck if you have a real bad crash.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,016

    Default

    Professionally built Late Model manufacturer's call them crush zones..The cage is rigid and solid but the front and rear clips are designed to "crush" in a large impact so it does transfer to the driver...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Car was built, like a racecar should. LOTS of bracing and cage around driver. Bracing under driver, under the floor pans like I said. The center of the car should not be flexing.

    The front is built light, not dangerous, but light. The rear has good bracing surrounding the cell...

    ...How the car is built was not the question.

    Is it possible with a heavy car, really heathly engine and a goood setup...to produce the forces necessary to break a driveshaft in two. thanks...
    2010 Dirtona Speedway IMCA Stock Track Champion

    AMSoil Dealer, beckett.roy@gmail.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roybeckett13j View Post
    Car was built, like a racecar should. LOTS of bracing and cage around driver. Bracing under driver, under the floor pans like I said. The center of the car should not be flexing.

    The front is built light, not dangerous, but light. The rear has good bracing surrounding the cell...

    ...How the car is built was not the question.

    Is it possible with a heavy car, really heathly engine and a goood setup...to produce the forces necessary to break a driveshaft in two. thanks...
    NO..........

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    The point was that the front and rear flexing can cause the drive shaft to hit the car in places you would never know that it would get clost to when it is on the ground and you are looking at it. This flex can also cause a large amount of driveshaft pinion angle changewhen added to the engine torque that can bind up the shaft and cause it to twist AND/OR bottom the shaft out into the trans which can cause shaft issues. Both of these issuse would be compounded when you installed an engine with more torque and got better traction.
    Unless you are over 750hp on a drag car with 12 inch slicks your engine is not twisting the driveshaft into 2 without help from something.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roybeckett13j View Post
    .

    Is it possible with a heavy car, really heathly engine and a goood setup...to produce the forces necessary to break a driveshaft in two. Thanks...
    no

    123456789

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    113

    Default

    I run a 600 hp metric car and the chassis is pretty stiff and have never broke or twisted a drive shaft. It may be like someone else said, the drive shaft is going into the trans too far or too much pinion angle ? Jeff (stock car) did you come to Louisiana several years back and race at ArkLaTex Speedway in an I-Stock car ? I think it was a $5000.00 to win race ?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ricky76 View Post
    I run a 600 hp metric car and the chassis is pretty stiff and have never broke or twisted a drive shaft. It may be like someone else said, the drive shaft is going into the trans too far or too much pinion angle ? Jeff (stock car) did you come to Louisiana several years back and race at ArkLaTex Speedway in an I-Stock car ? I think it was a $5000.00 to win race ?
    No that was jeremy christians from wisconsin in a big full body malibu like I had in 06/07/08/09. Hes in a metric car now also and has been for about the same time frame as me, 09/10/11.

    Since I started looking for races like that its a factory stock race now and IMCA cars arent close to legal.

    jj

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    113

    Default

    [QUOTE=stock car driver;1444501]No that was jeremy christians from wisconsin in a big full body malibu like I had in 06/07/08/09. Hes in a metric car now also and has been for about the same time frame as me, 09/10/11.

    Since I started looking for races like that its a factory stock race now and IMCA cars arent close to legal.

    jj[/QUO Yeah they stopped running that class around here. Now they're called Super Stock or Southern Stock. The factory stocks are the ones that are having all the "big" money races. There's a $5000 one coming up, a $2000, and a $2500 coming up. They also run factory stocks for $1000-$1500 several times a year around here now.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.