Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    262

    Default

    the valves arent stock length the only stock size. thats y i can go up to .540 lift
    jared flower

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    262

    Default

    and i built my engine with my curent cam on a pc build and like u said max power was 6000 and droped 5 hp at 6500 and 20 hp at 7000 and 45 from max at 7500 and playing with schinders cams the best is the 304h but with a 112 lobe center but the only down side is they dont say what intake and ex lobe centers are. so i played with ti and the motor like 116 and 102 lobe centers. so why is it everyone grinds there cams at 106 if 112 makes more power ?
    jared flower

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lewiston ID
    Posts
    293

    Default Why do people grind.....

    Because people don't race PC's and a Real life dyno makes no assumptions on the data!
    JerryM

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    340

    Default Lobe Centers

    The tighter102-108 lobe centers accelerate harder in the mid-range,110 plus gives a smoother idle and more high rpm power.
    Actual valve timing events are the most important measurements but lobe centers are useful way to compare cams.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    262

    Default

    thanks racedad that makes alot more sence. thanks for explining it instead of hating that i brought what found out. on a pc.
    jared flower

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    In a dyno cell somewhere
    Posts
    34

    Default

    I don't think there's any hating going on. Just folks trying to help. Another characteristic of lobe centers is that tighter lobe centers tend to be peaky horsepower wise. Wider lobe centers tend to produce a flatter but wider torque curve. On tracks with longer straightaways I tend to use 110 and up centerlines.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    262

    Default

    ok that makes sence. well ran the car this weekend after reseting the cam heads up and 32' adv and ran realy good and went from my 723/4 lr role out to a 74 lr role out and rr from a 733/4 to a 741/2 to help the gearing/ rpm problem and it seem to help installing a tech for the next race. so why where talking about cams what about heads i know most people say its all personal preference but is there one thats better for say a 1/4 mile track?
    jared flower

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lewiston ID
    Posts
    293

    Default Ignition timing

    You might try 4-6 degrees more timing, most built 2300's like 38-40 total.....
    JerryM

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Post Falls,ID
    Posts
    1,579

    Default

    i agree with Jerry(crcltrakr)

    we run 36-38 with stock rod and 38-41 with long rod...makes a HUGE power difference
    No matter how hard you try...you cant fix stupid!!!

    If you build it right...it will turn left!!!

    www.raceidaho.com

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 14flower View Post
    what rpms should i try to have then at then end of the striaght away? and that somehing else i was wondering what rpm max should i turn with that set and a 5.2 bottom end?
    you can turn stock rods 8200 if you know the tricks and use good rod bolts! i would run 103 lobe seperation will get you of the corner better but with out flowing your head your running in the dark you must know what your capable of before you start tossing money at it! and valve springs plays a huge part in your rpms so start at the bottom and go up!!

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crcltrakr View Post
    You might try 4-6 degrees more timing, most built 2300's like 38-40 total.....
    with 5.2 rods??

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    262

    Default

    ya i only run like 32 34 but that was on 103 octane now runing 114 too. and dan i just have normal arp rod bolts was thinking of rying to put arp s2000 rod bolts in some 5.2 rods just to play with it. and im gona flow the head with in the next couple of weeks. and i found a guy with a raceengineering cam forsale on ebay has 104 lobe center with intake on 102 and 252 duration @.050 .480 lift would that work?
    jared flower

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 14flower View Post
    ya i only run like 32 34 but that was on 103 octane now runing 114 too. and dan i just have normal arp rod bolts was thinking of rying to put arp s2000 rod bolts in some 5.2 rods just to play with it. and im gona flow the head with in the next couple of weeks. and i found a guy with a raceengineering cam forsale on ebay has 104 lobe center with intake on 102 and 252 duration @.050 .480 lift would that work?
    not bad check those #s make sure there right!!

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    262

    Default

    i did i went to raceeng.com and double checked the cam card.
    jared flower

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.