Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Spoiler angle

  1. #1

    Default Spoiler angle

    First off if this has been discussed on this board several times I appologise. We run mainly IMCA modifieds, but get the chance to run a latemodel a hand full of times each year. We are suffering from an overall loose/lacking forward drive off of the corner. I havnt put an angle finder on the spoiler, but was curious how much angle guys on here run. I was thinking of standing the spoiler straight up. How much affect does this have on the cars?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    120

    Default

    I saw in a magazine where after so many degrees the spoiler becomes more drag than downforce. I cant recall number?? Anyone know? Id guess 60's?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,636

    Default

    I think it is much lower than most people realize. I think it is quite a bit less than 60.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Speedway magazine had a dirt late model in a wind tunnel several years ago, the whole car is designed to create a vacuum under it and the spoiler actually increases or decreases where the rear decks pressure is and actually varies nose down force more than it creates drag. Even with the spoiler straight up and down the pressure on the deck is increased farther forward on the deck. The worst drag on the car was the drop at the front of the deck where the hood ends. On some old cars that was 3 inches tall. The higher spoiler angle also caused the car to decrease the negative pressure area under the car as the air rolling over the spoiler actually went under the car at the rear the same way that air going over the pickup cab drops into the bead and creates a rolling low air pressure area but without the bottom of the bed in there it just pulls over the back and rolls under.
    Last edited by Egoracing; 07-17-2012 at 06:47 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Moody, AL
    Posts
    163

    Default

    I know this is off topic from the thread title, but what you're saying Ego, is that the drop decks cause more drag than you think and it's adviseable to have a deck flush with the hood? I have a "newer" car with a drop deck on it, and it's probably a good 3". On the other hand, I have I guess what you would call "fins" built around the opening of the driver's box, probably 4" tall, to help send that air to the spoiler. I guess what I'm asking is, do those fins make up for the drag on the drop deck by sending air to the spoiler than what it would if I didn't have those fins built around the driver's box? Or am I missing the whole concept?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    359

    Default

    Ever look at a spoiler on a pro stock drag car? Nuff said ...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,940

    Default

    Just to clear up what may be some confusion: Any time you increase down-force your going to increase drag, that's just the nature of the beast.

    There are going to be times where you can increase down-force with only a minor increase in drag and other times where the increase in drag is much higher all the way to where you may only add a couple pound of down-force but add several points of drag coefficient.

    So what you should be looking at is the added down-force worth the added drag?????

    Seeing how a typical late model body has an average drag of .XX (doesn't matter the actual number, just know this is an average Drag on a LM body). Now take in the fact that with this average number (.XX) that it only takes around 400HP to make the car go 120MPH (this has been published in different articles over the years). How often are you running at those speeds and with only 400HP?????

    The general consensus among people that do aerodynamic testing is that with the given drag and power ratio of a LM, that any extra down-force is more then worth the added cost in drag. If you were running a large track where handling/down-force wasn't an issue and HP/speeds where low/high enough then removing drag at the cost of down-force could be an advantage. However this just really doesn't happen in the dirt LM world.

    To answer the OP question: Around 70 degrees is where the ratio of drag/down-force, really starts to go heavy drag for diminishing returns on the down-force. That doesn't mean that the back of the car has less down-force with 80 degrees the 70, it just means you may have added twice the drag to gain a 10% gain in rear down-force.
    Last edited by billetbirdcage; 07-17-2012 at 11:14 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C10 View Post
    Ever look at a spoiler on a pro stock drag car? Nuff said ...
    They make a TON of down force BUT they are designed for well over 100 mph AND the back of their cars are closed in.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by latemodel86 View Post
    I know this is off topic from the thread title, but what you're saying Ego, is that the drop decks cause more drag than you think and it's adviseable to have a deck flush with the hood? I have a "newer" car with a drop deck on it, and it's probably a good 3". On the other hand, I have I guess what you would call "fins" built around the opening of the driver's box, probably 4" tall, to help send that air to the spoiler. I guess what I'm asking is, do those fins make up for the drag on the drop deck by sending air to the spoiler than what it would if I didn't have those fins built around the driver's box? Or am I missing the whole concept?
    They did a lot in the article, put tapers on the rear of the tubes, the rear of the seat to the deck, made the dash drop go away, and changed shape of some of the components and front fins and hood to nose changes. The single biggest thing was the dash drop, getting rid of that was MUCH better than tapering all of the tubing AND tapering the seat to the deck. That little drop creates an area of low pressure that creates a large amount of drag in that area. It was right after that article that Rockets came out without that drop.
    All they used for the changes was cardboard and tape but to get rid of that drop they use a 4-5 inch flat piece across the area and it made a difference.

  10. #10

    Default http://www.circletrack.com/ultimateracing/ctrp_0908_dirt_late_model_in_wind_tunnel/vi

    Hi guys --- go to this Circle Track wind tunnel test done by Jeff Smith ..... Thanks Dominator Race Products !!http://www.circletrack.com/ultimater...l/viewall.html

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Moody, AL
    Posts
    163

    Default

    Thanks for sharing, learned a lot from the article.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,636

    Default

    I think everyone is making this drag arguement too simplistic. Drag does limit your top speed, but it isn't always correct to say that it doesn't matter as long as you have reserve horsepower to still reach some top speed.

    That drag is a force in the opposite direction of the car's motion. Force is equal to mass times acceleration. That drag is limiting your car's acceleration up the straight. If you have plenty of grip to get off a slow, paperclip tracks corner, is the downforce at high speed advantageous vs the drag you have added that cripples your acceleration off the corner?
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aerotech/Dominator View Post
    Hi guys --- go to this Circle Track wind tunnel test done by Jeff Smith ..... Thanks Dominator Race Products !!http://www.circletrack.com/ultimater...l/viewall.html
    That was a good article but the Speedway article was MUCH more descriptive and showed more as they were the one doing the testing. I have not been able to find any info on line about their test though.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Central IL
    Posts
    654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
    That drag is a force in the opposite direction of the car's motion. Force is equal to mass times acceleration. That drag is limiting your car's acceleration up the straight. If you have plenty of grip to get off a slow, paperclip tracks corner, is the downforce at high speed advantageous vs the drag you have added that cripples your acceleration off the corner?
    Yeah that's it right there. On a momentum track, where you keep it wound pretty well, as long as you have enough hp to reach top speed, you can add drag ok. much different beast (all around, not just drag) when you're talking stop and go tracks.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Midwest America
    Posts
    191

    Default

    The pro stock drag race cars spoiler is designed to create lift on the back of the car reducing drag not increasing drag. That is why it goes straight back horizontally. A funny car on the other hand uses a huge spoiler and spill plates to add huge down force (and necessay drag) but they have 8000 horsepower to use up. Top fuel cars use wings proper to increase down force with the least amount of drag. I think the top fuel cars generate somewhere in the neighborhood of 4000 lbs of down force on a car that weighs less than 2000 lbs (also using 8000 horsepower)

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,436

    Default

    Sorry 700 but you are wrong.The spoilers on pro stocks are laid all the way down to create down force without creating drag.If they created lift they would not be able to run over 200mph without without the back end lifting off the ground.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by perfconn View Post
    Sorry 700 but you are wrong.The spoilers on pro stocks are laid all the way down to create down force without creating drag.If they created lift they would not be able to run over 200mph without without the back end lifting off the ground.
    Correct, the flat spoiler in conjunction with the rear of the car creates a huge low pressure area under the spoiler and generates a TON of down force.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    359

    Default

    EXACTLY!, the flat spoiler on a PS car also stabilizes the car from swaying by taking away any high pressure from under the car at the rear.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    558

    Default

    Not to hijack but what about air under the car. I remember carl edwards winning a race and had his oil tank lid off alowing air from under the car escape. something like 200lbs of force(i know thats at 200mph) But would something such as a hole or an access panel being left open do anything????
    Chris Zogg

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyin Iowan View Post
    Not to hijack but what about air under the car. I remember carl edwards winning a race and had his oil tank lid off alowing air from under the car escape. something like 200lbs of force(i know thats at 200mph) But would something such as a hole or an access panel being left open do anything????
    It's completely different with a LM, for one major reason: The nose of the car isn't sealed off the the ground like an asphalt car can/will be. Since the nose of a LM isn't really ever sealed to the ground, they can't create the high low pressure area under the car. I know during a test on a dirt LM the down-force really didn't change much with the car at static ride height verses with the car at close to 20 degrees of yaw (left side up). If the nose was in fact sealed to the track, raising the left side should have unsealed the nose and significantly reduced the down-force, but it didn't.

    Things like you mentioned can help, but whether if helps or not is dependent of several factors and your dealing with one car that has a windshield and a body that is contoured where the air follows the outside body without obstructions in the way. Where a LM has no windshield and then still has a roof and a drivers mud deflector and driver's head/helmet, so there are all kinds of things that will/can cause turbulence and create low and high pressure areas along the top side of the LM body. It's just not that cut and dry, to say this would work on a car so different to a cup car

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.