Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    353

    Default metric chassis ride height?

    Trying to help a friend set up his mod. We don't know who built it, but it is a metric clip, metric spindles and lowers. I is a 2 bar rear suspension with a pull bar. It will run with UMP. Any help on ride heights for the metric clip? Springs? Bite? Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Lf 6.5" @ bottom of frame rail before dog leg.
    With 700# 9.5" tall
    Rf 7-7.25" same place w/600 spring 9.5 tall
    K772/K727 ball joints
    Rear springs 175/225 RR on top LR infront
    Dont remember rear hts. 130# bite
    Lr bar 2" shorter then RR bar
    Short Pull bar with quickcar buiscuits 1/8" preload change every 10 nights run @ 18*
    No wrap up shock
    Short bar on slick/j bar on heavy/tackey
    Lr bar 20ish* rr bar 10-15*
    shocks Lf 75 rf 74. Lr 95-3 (gas) Rr 94
    Cross 52 left 52.5 rear 57-58 on alky 56-57on gas

    Now this is what worked for me on a sandy track check with some people at ur local track to see what they ran. May have to drop bar angle/bite/cross for a track with good clay!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    353

    Default metric chassis

    Thank you. That is enough info to get us going.

  4. #4

    Default

    Kojak, are those springs rates for metric lowers, or nova lowers?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lock Haven, Pa
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Looks pretty soft for metric lowers....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Yes metric lowers! I know this always starts argument but i have always had success with those spring rates. My current car 4/4 is all metric and run 700/650 with a tie down shock on the Rf! Everyone says u cant run that soft of a spring on metric mods but i know of alot of cars that do and even run lighter then that. Ive been doing it since 03 and dont plan on changing it! Alot of people say they bottom out and i have no idea why, im guessing they are running stock metric ball joints and/or have their ride heights to low. Kinda sounds like they may have a Moment Center issue.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kojak_9x View Post
    Yes metric lowers! I know this always starts argument but i have always had success with those spring rates. My current car 4/4 is all metric and run 700/650 with a tie down shock on the Rf! Everyone says u cant run that soft of a spring on metric mods but i know of alot of cars that do and even run lighter then that. Ive been doing it since 03 and dont plan on changing it! Alot of people say they bottom out and i have no idea why, im guessing they are running stock metric ball joints and/or have their ride heights to low. Kinda sounds like they may have a Moment Center issue.
    This goes against most rates I've read about, but I'm gonna try a 750rf 850 lf! Does seem like no matter what rf spring rate we have shock travel stays the same!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.