Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1

    Default 3rd links and panhard bar

    On asphalt, will a car with the above upgrades have a significant advantage over a car without these. If so, what would be the advantages? I'm trying to educate myself on this subject. Thanks guys!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Thurston, OH
    Posts
    915

    Default

    A 3-link rear system with a panhard bar allows a wide range of adjustability regarding rear moment center for traction & control of rear/front roll. Which is valuable for helping to overcome 'tight' & 'loose' conditions. If you don't have the book, I HIGHLY suggest Bob Bolles 'Stock Car Setup Secrets'. ISBN 1-55788-401-3 . He covers your subject of interest extremely thoroughly. As well as the front end aspects also. Some of the best $$$ you'll ever spend on your race car! -84Dave-

  3. #3

    Default

    Thanks Dave. Myrtle beach has adopted mayhem rules for theie ministock race with allows this setup. We will be running stock rearend. So no chance for us

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Post Falls,ID
    Posts
    1,579

    Default

    you can run a stock rearend and still use 3 link with panhard
    No matter how hard you try...you cant fix stupid!!!

    If you build it right...it will turn left!!!

    www.raceidaho.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Its a great setup that you can adapt to a stock rearend. I run a three link and a panhard on an 8.8 Ford. I created an attachment that utilizes the existing bushing ears, offset the three link a few inches to the passenger's side. The front attaches through the interior of the car to a point on the rollcage. The panhard is an off the shelf MM unit.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Post Falls,ID
    Posts
    1,579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by horsewidower View Post
    Its a great setup that you can adapt to a stock rearend. I run a three link and a panhard on an 8.8 Ford. I created an attachment that utilizes the existing bushing ears, offset the three link a few inches to the passenger's side. The front attaches through the interior of the car to a point on the rollcage. The panhard is an off the shelf MM unit.
    im curious...if you dont mind can you send some pictures to chaney2333@roadrunner.com
    No matter how hard you try...you cant fix stupid!!!

    If you build it right...it will turn left!!!

    www.raceidaho.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    323

    Default RR Link and Roll Steer

    Curious. I remember a few years ago some guys running on asphalt had the RR link nearly twice as long as the LR link. I think it was mainly to reduce or eliminate the amount of roll steer that would occur as the car rolled through the turn.Is anyone still doing this?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    164

    Default

    I'll see if I can find some of my photos, its been a while since I've been on here. Are we still allowed to post photos?

    Bob

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Thurston, OH
    Posts
    915

    Default

    RaceMan....... yes indeed, the lengths of all links of a 3-link system matter. The longer the lower links, the better. Keeping in mind that through a corner, when the right side rolls downward, the vertical length of that travel is ~2x the upward vertical travel of the left side. So, in terms of roll-steer, the longer the right lower link, the better. Bolles covers that aspect well in the book I referenced above. A couple of other important matters. The contact patch of the RR should follow in-line with the patch of the RF as nearly as practical..... adjustment Rules permitting. Checking/adjusting bump-steer in the front geometry? Most make the mistake of checking/adjusting that geometry with the front tires pointing straight ahead. Wrong! That correction should be checked/made with the front tires steered to the left, the same ~amount as would be steered left at most short-track oval's. It's all those 'little' items that can make a serious difference in the chassis/handling abilities of the race car. -84Dave-

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 84Dave View Post
    RaceMan....... yes indeed, the lengths of all links of a 3-link system matter. The longer the lower links, the better. Keeping in mind that through a corner, when the right side rolls downward, the vertical length of that travel is ~2x the upward vertical travel of the left side. So, in terms of roll-steer, the longer the right lower link, the better. Bolles covers that aspect well in the book I referenced above. A couple of other important matters. The contact patch of the RR should follow in-line with the patch of the RF as nearly as practical..... adjustment Rules permitting. Checking/adjusting bump-steer in the front geometry? Most make the mistake of checking/adjusting that geometry with the front tires pointing straight ahead. Wrong! That correction should be checked/made with the front tires steered to the left, the same ~amount as would be steered left at most short-track oval's. It's all those 'little' items that can make a serious difference in the chassis/handling abilities of the race car. -84Dave-
    Thanks, Dave. Good info.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Third link, front attachment:





    Still looking for the upper link axle mount.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Here you go.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.