|
|
-
Hey, call me crazy but:
Ok, folks, help me out here, there is something that isn’t right with this Benghazi deal going on with Panetta’s testimony today. When he was asked about the timeline of his visits with the President, he stated that he talked to the President at 5:15 on 9-11 and had no further conversations with him, the President told him “handle it”, do what ever it takes and then bailed. OK, think about this, I don’t think he can do that, because Panetta or the head of the Joint Chiefs can not give the order singularly to launch an attack on a foreign country. Their covering something up they don’t want the President to be involved with. Think about this, this administration does everything within its power to make this President look like he is on top of everything. Think about the statement about guns and the President never shooting, next morning, low and behold there you have a picture of the President supposedly skeet shooting at eye level. OK fine. Pick out any even that happens and his handlers have him front and center for the camera right away, showing him engaged, like the picture for when they got OSB, there the President was in all his radiant beauty sweating’ out every detail. But now on Benghazi, he was no where in sight? He just handed the whole thing to Panetta? Really? You actually think he’d do that with out a reason? This President has never done anything that showed he was not engaged in any situation, but all of a sudden on Benghazi he’s napping? They had no contact from the President from about 5:15 on for about 9 hours, why? Where was he? The President is directly responsible for his Ambassadors, did he just blow this situation off? It seems as though he’d like everyone to think that and thanks to Rand Paul, maybe we know why. Gun running out of the embassy down there. Obama thinks the hit of him being disconnected from the attack sequence will be far far less then getting caught in another gun running scheme . This way, when it come to light, he can stand up front of the crowd and say he had nothing to do with any of it and in hind sight he’ll say I should have been more engaged. So we know that guns were involved cause they had the captain of a boat tell them he was hauling guns to Libya, via Turkey, hence the reason for the Turkish diplomat to be down there for the earlier dinner engagement. And who is getting the guns? Why its our good friends the good ole Muslim Brotherhood, (for the Syrian Rebels) same jokers that are getting F-16’s and tanks in Egypt. Ain’t things starting to stink just a little bit? Keep in mind here, there is a CIA safe house about a block away from the embassy and they Administration complained there wasn't sufficiant intel, really? I ain't buyin' that their trying to sell...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvU_MPYramE
One point to make, there were 9 hours to get reinforcements in there, there were forces less then two hours away, I'm not jumping on the Military, but someone didn't give the order for a reason...
There were about 30 or so other people that were rescued from that attack, where are they? And where is the media asking "where are they". Certainly a lot of questions to get answers for. Of course, according to Hilary, who cares....
_________________
-
Originally Posted by mudslinger47
Ok, folks, help me out here, there is something that isn’t right with this Benghazi deal going on with Panetta’s testimony today. When he was asked about the timeline of his visits with the President, he stated that he talked to the President at 5:15 on 9-11 and had no further conversations with him, the President told him “handle it”, do what ever it takes and then bailed. OK, think about this, I don’t think he can do that, because Panetta or the head of the Joint Chiefs can not give the order singularly to launch an attack on a foreign country. Their covering something up they don’t want the President to be involved with. Think about this, this administration does everything within its power to make this President look like he is on top of everything. Think about the statement about guns and the President never shooting, next morning, low and behold there you have a picture of the President supposedly skeet shooting at eye level. OK fine. Pick out any even that happens and his handlers have him front and center for the camera right away, showing him engaged, like the picture for when they got OSB, there the President was in all his radiant beauty sweating’ out every detail. But now on Benghazi, he was no where in sight? He just handed the whole thing to Panetta? Really? You actually think he’d do that with out a reason? This President has never done anything that showed he was not engaged in any situation, but all of a sudden on Benghazi he’s napping? They had no contact from the President from about 5:15 on for about 9 hours, why? Where was he? The President is directly responsible for his Ambassadors, did he just blow this situation off? It seems as though he’d like everyone to think that and thanks to Rand Paul, maybe we know why. Gun running out of the embassy down there. Obama thinks the hit of him being disconnected from the attack sequence will be far far less then getting caught in another gun running scheme . This way, when it come to light, he can stand up front of the crowd and say he had nothing to do with any of it and in hind sight he’ll say I should have been more engaged. So we know that guns were involved cause they had the captain of a boat tell them he was hauling guns to Libya, via Turkey, hence the reason for the Turkish diplomat to be down there for the earlier dinner engagement. And who is getting the guns? Why its our good friends the good ole Muslim Brotherhood, (for the Syrian Rebels) same jokers that are getting F-16’s and tanks in Egypt. Ain’t things starting to stink just a little bit? Keep in mind here, there is a CIA safe house about a block away from the embassy and they Administration complained there wasn't sufficiant intel, really? I ain't buyin' that their trying to sell...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvU_MPYramE
One point to make, there were 9 hours to get reinforcements in there, there were forces less then two hours away, I'm not jumping on the Military, but someone didn't give the order for a reason...
There were about 30 or so other people that were rescued from that attack, where are they? And where is the media asking "where are they". Certainly a lot of questions to get answers for. Of course, according to Hilary, who cares....
_________________
This administration covered this up from the beginning and everyone knows it. It's no secrete.
-
Obummer should get the well deserved blame, that he has coming. It's time for some brave people in government to step up and take on the issues of his removal.
-
Originally Posted by Clayton_Wetter
Obummer should get the well deserved blame, that he has coming. It's time for some brave people in government to step up and take on the issues of his removal.
now where in the he11 are we going to find them
-
the Yemen terrorist attacked it 9/11/12 who gave the command for the attack i have no ideal but Rice has a few squirming.
-
Ya didn't read it did ya Kid....
-
Benghazi, here's how it should go.
Obama and the rest of his flunkies should come out and say "hey we screwed the pooch on Benghazi, and then proceeded to blow a smoke up the publics arrssee. Because it was an election year and we feel the american public is retarted and to stupid to know any better."
Then the Republicans should say. " Thank you for being honest, we would have done the same thing, and feel the same way about the public."
Case closed.
"This will remain the land of the free only as long as it is the home of the brave."-Elmer Davis
WWTDD.
-
The dems played it perfect. Unemployement was the big topic and was hurting Obama. When the republicans brought up Benghazi the people forgot about the unemployement and Obama went on to win the election. The republicans should of stayed on track with unemployement and we would of had a different preisdent today.
-
The only thing obummer played perfect was the low information voter...They didn't know then and they don't know now.
-
-
Originally Posted by mudslinger47
The only thing obummer played perfect was the low information voter...They didn't know then and they don't know now.
Uneducated voters are on both sides!!
-
Originally Posted by ss12
Uneducated voters are on both sides!!
You mean there are Patriotic citizens who are stupid enough to vote for Communists and Progressives like Obummer/Pelosi/Reid? Please enlighten us on who these people are!
-
neither Romney or paul could pull in ther own home state, wonder why those that knew them best wouldn't vote for them. most likely a cover up ther as well that the media wont report on not even fixed news. the channel that test have proven has the least informed viewers on the facts.
-
Originally Posted by Clayton_Wetter
You mean there are Patriotic citizens who are stupid enough to vote for Communists and Progressives like Obummer/Pelosi/Reid? Please enlighten us on who these people are!
The reason people are running from the republican party is because of people like you. Even Fox's news are running from the status quo and now are replacing Rove,Palin,and Morris. Maybe you should contact them and see if you can get a job with them. LOL good luck!!
-
Originally Posted by ss12
The reason people are running from the republican party is because of people like you. Even Fox's news are running from the status quo and now are replacing Rove,Palin,and Morris. Maybe you should contact them and see if you can get a job with them. LOL good luck!!
What did I do wrong besides point out the communist progressives takoever of the government. Many people like me realize what is going on, while people like you stay in the dark.
-
Originally Posted by ss12
The reason people are running from the republican party is because of people like you. Even Fox's news are running from the status quo and now are replacing Rove,Palin,and Morris. Maybe you should contact them and see if you can get a job with them. LOL good luck!!
You know why Rove and Morris are gone? Because they flat out lied. If they want to go with the GOP fine let them go, the GOP is losing people left and right, they have turned into Democrat lite. I got no use for them. There RINO's pure and simple...
-
Originally Posted by mudslinger47
You know why Rove and Morris are gone? Because they flat out lied. If they want to go with the GOP fine let them go, the GOP is losing people left and right, they have turned into Democrat lite. I got no use for them. There RINO's pure and simple...
"Lying" isn't that part of the neo-conn gop platform? Thats why so many people are voting the way they are. They are tired of being lied too. You knew Romney and the GOP were lying so you voted for them anyway? There were more voting options out there that fit your agenda. If we keep voting for the same 2 parties nothing will change. These 2 parties are just puppets for the corporations. They quit working for the people a long time ago and the sooner we realize this the better things will get.
-
Originally Posted by ss12
"Lying" isn't that part of the neo-conn gop platform? Thats why so many people are voting the way they are. They are tired of being lied too. You knew Romney and the GOP were lying so you voted for them anyway? There were more voting options out there that fit your agenda. If we keep voting for the same 2 parties nothing will change. These 2 parties are just puppets for the corporations. They quit working for the people a long time ago and the sooner we realize this the better things will get.
I don't think Romney was lying, and Rove didn't show his true colors until a couple of weeks ago. Wasting your time voting for a fringe idiot is just that, a waste of time. You choose one of the major two parties and you take it back. All the rest will never amount to little more then 5%. And get off the neo-con BS, ya sound like some 14 yr old conspiracy nutburger. I'd bet you don't even know what one is. Tell me one administration that has lied more then this one, hell Klinton was the master and he can't hold a candle to this guy...
-
Originally Posted by ss12
"Lying" isn't that part of the neo-conn gop platform? Thats why so many people are voting the way they are. They are tired of being lied too. You knew Romney and the GOP were lying so you voted for them anyway? There were more voting options out there that fit your agenda. If we keep voting for the same 2 parties nothing will change. These 2 parties are just puppets for the corporations. They quit working for the people a long time ago and the sooner we realize this the better things will get.
The billion dollar Obummer campaign convinced many low info voters that Romney (basically not lieing though you don't believe it) was lieing and at the same time put iceing on a turd for their own candidate the real liar.
-
Originally Posted by Clayton_Wetter
The billion dollar Obummer campaign convinced many low info voters that Romney (basically not lieing though you don't believe it) was lieing and at the same time put iceing on a turd for their own candidate the real liar.
Romney didn't spend a Billion? Romney lost because they didn't stay on track with unemployement. The republicans did an excellent job of getting off track and brought of a topic that most undeucated voter don't understand. Benghazi. The democrated media kept it on the air waves and the republicans kept it up. Then the perfect storm Sandy came. All of this and guess what Obama won. And you guys are still talking about it and everybody else has forgotten about it. Thats what happen when you are an old white guy. Stuck in time and not willing to change.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.
|
|
Bookmarks