Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Default 3 Brakes, no bias

    Do you want to use aggressive compound brake pads on the rear, or stick with stock type pads that offer less braking? I end up using the brake sometimes in the turns and tight traffic to help control the car, but car seems to set well into the turn with the brakes now. Affraid if I put better brakes on the back, it might not handle so well in the turns riding the brake.


    Or should I just leave it alone.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auburn, IL
    Posts
    2,854

    Default Tricks of the trade...

    Options:
    1) Put good brake pads like HAWK on the LF,RR,LR and putting stock pads on the RF
    2) Grinding down the RF pad so there's less pad than the 3 other corners.
    3) Using and Hiding a RF brake shut off when rules don't allow them.

    These help the car turn when applying brakes but still provides 4 brake stopping power. I never liked 3 wheel brakes when they were really needed for bad situations. It literally turns the car into a spin on straight aways and corning when applied HARD! 3 wheel brakes are great for setting the car but for all other situations it's bad! In many rules, 4 braking system is required.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Just curious about the 3 vs 4 brake setup. At our track we can run with a shut off valve for the front right. I an going to run with the 4 brake option but am curious as to what is best for wet and dry tracks. Ours is banked and most of the time our track is going to be dry slick with a narrow groove in 1 and 2 and a little wider for 3 and 4. I like to charge the corner hard, use as little brake as possible and then off them and on the gas. We run hoosier f40 slicks and is fun when it gets dry.

    3 or 4 brake for this condition?

    Thanks

    Russ

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auburn, IL
    Posts
    2,854

    Default

    4 brakes...3 brakes will get the rear-end sliding on entry and on a dry slick track it will be a handful! In most cases 3 wheel brakes on a slick track will hinder you than help. On slick tracks I'm putting more brake to the front with my brake bias.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    LAS VEGAS, NV.
    Posts
    791

    Default

    Todd is right, I had 3 wheel brakes on my Camaro. If I had to jam the brakes it would pull so hard to the left it would twist the car. My Monte I run now has 4 wheel brakes with front/rear bias control. Ill never got back to 3 wheel.

    There are other ways to get the bias you desire:

    I run an oversized caliper on the left front and an undersized on the right. It still allows for left/right bias but gives the 4 wheel stability. I also run standard size on the rears. Some say different size lines effect bias as well, not sure though I never tried. #3 I guess give more applied pressure to the caliper, while #4 gives more volume to the caliper.
    »»*†HÀ†§ HÓ††™««

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ToddSmith16 View Post
    Options:
    1) Put good brake pads like HAWK on the LF,RR,LR and putting stock pads on the RF
    2) Grinding down the RF pad so there's less pad than the 3 other corners.
    3) Using and Hiding a RF brake shut off when rules don't allow them.

    These help the car turn when applying brakes but still provides 4 brake stopping power. I never liked 3 wheel brakes when they were really needed for bad situations. It literally turns the car into a spin on straight aways and corning when applied HARD! 3 wheel brakes are great for setting the car but for all other situations it's bad! In many rules, 4 braking system is required.
    In #2 if you're just changing the thickness it won't make a difference.

    However, if you're talking about changing the end-to-end, top-to-bottom dimensions then I can see it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    104

    Default

    We run the speedway pads and grind a little off the RF. It pulls a little to the left but not extreme. I would never run with only 3.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Plainfield, IL
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RACEMAN View Post
    In #2 if you're just changing the thickness it won't make a difference.

    However, if you're talking about changing the end-to-end, top-to-bottom dimensions then I can see it.
    I ran my front brakes like this. Stock pads cut down so there was only a 2" square of pad left in the center of the backing plate. They never came apart if you are worried about that. Worked great. Had hawk black pads in the back. We found a ballance that worked for us. Cheep way to try some Bias.

    Dave
    2012 UMP Stock Car National Champions.
    2013 UMP Modified Rookie of the Year
    2014 Kankakee Speedway UMP Modified Champion
    2016 Fairbury American Legion Speedway UMP Modified Champion
    2016 Kankakee Speedway UMP Modified Champion
    2016 UMP Modified, Northen IL Regional Champion
    2018 UMP Modified, #2 National Points Standings
    Like us on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/McKinneyMotorsports

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    323

    Default ?????

    Have some guys been running a brake bias adjuster in the front brakes to provide some adjust-ability? And I'm meaning left side to right side, not front to rear. Seems to me I've seen that mentioned somewhere.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    I ran for years with only one rear brake... less unsprung weight and it still stops both rear wheels.
    Member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame
    Class of 2019

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.