Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    105

    Question Rearend Question

    When switching over from a 9" rear to a quick change, does the car act differently? If so please give particulars about what you have experienced. This is on a 3-link set-up with pullbar and solid mounted lower arms. Thank you in advance for any replies................

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    No really the quickchange can unless you really get the low drag stuff kill more HP. The Pinion static height is different between the two so you have to compensate with your static pinion mount on the Jbar. other then that if all your shocks and bars arm mounted in the comparable locations there isn't really a difference

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    9" drives off the LR
    QC drives off the RR
    have to add a smidge more wedge to compensate
    Pinion is about 2" lower on QC. generally you have to move back of motor down a bit to correct driveshaft angle.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    This I have to hear. A spool Is a spool and locker is a locker they don't know what they are in....someone fell asleep in physics class......

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    It has to do with the direction of force (downward pressure) applied to tire when the pinion gear tries to climb the ring gear. Torque
    On a 9" rear, or any conventional style axle, there is more pressure applied to the LR wheel on acceleration.
    Which is why on an open rear end, you punch the throttle to accelerate in a straight line, the RR wheel spins, even though motor torque tries to twist chassis and plant RR, it still unloads the RR tire.
    that is why a lot of drag racers add their battery to the right rear corner of their vehicle.

    On a qc, the pinion is on the back side of the axle, and on the opposite side of ring gear, so the torque applied when pinion tries to climb the ring gear more pressure is applied to the RR wheel.

    It has nothing to do with lockers, or spools.
    It has to do with torque, and the directional forces in which items react when power, or rotation is applied.
    That is why you have to add a bit of wedge to compensate, typically I add about 25lbs on a 4 link car.
    Just my opinion.
    Last edited by JustAddDirt; 09-04-2013 at 03:04 PM.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Mark Bush talks a little about it and I believe Steve smith does to, it's no opinion, guess u wasnt asleep in physics lol.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Some people...thanks to those who provide real and understandable responses to questions.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustAddDirt View Post
    It has to do with the direction of force (downward pressure) applied to tire when the pinion gear tries to climb the ring gear. Torque
    On a 9" rear, or any conventional style axle, there is more pressure applied to the LR wheel on acceleration.
    Which is why on an open rear end, you punch the throttle to accelerate in a straight line, the RR wheel spins, even though motor torque tries to twist chassis and plant RR, it still unloads the RR tire.
    that is why a lot of drag racers add their battery to the right rear corner of their vehicle.

    On a qc, the pinion is on the back side of the axle, and on the opposite side of ring gear, so the torque applied when pinion tries to climb the ring gear more pressure is applied to the RR wheel.

    It has nothing to do with lockers, or spools.
    It has to do with torque, and the directional forces in which items react when power, or rotation is applied.
    That is why you have to add a bit of wedge to compensate, typically I add about 25lbs on a 4 link car.
    Just my opinion.
    Thank you Dr. Sheldon Cooper for your physics lesson. Your theories on mechanical quantum physics & string theory is enlightening.

    Knock Knock Penny! Knock Knock Penny! Knock Knock Penny!

  9. #9

    Default

    And I just thought all he could do is drive!!!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    This is the first I've heard of this and if you run a spool or locker you can't bust one tire loose without the other so what's the true difference? We are loading the cars through bar angles and springs to control dynamic weight transfer and thrust angles and this pertains to neither so for all PRACTICAL purposes if he mounts all his bars at the same toe angles and static angles and distance away from axle centerline he should be fine. I've never talked to a manufacturer on a modified where its commons to see both rear ends and see them list or ask which one your running so they can dial you in. Mark has never even mentioned this stuff to me, in the ever changing traction world of dirt keep it simple.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    I'm pretty sure your not meaning to say the whole balance of force is different LR to RR MAYBE slightly toward one way more then the other which that might be true it's not really even worth mentioning unless he's going to be drag racing especially when you're also suggesting he move his motor down which most you can't just "tilt" the motor back with central block mounts and midplates you can really only raise and lower which would be a significant change I've played with before trying to get my shaft height right and that also is not a compromise to make with that weight drop it in see what you feel and go from there

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustAddDirt View Post
    9" drives off the LR
    QC drives off the RR
    have to add a smidge more wedge to compensate
    Pinion is about 2" lower on QC. generally you have to move back of motor down a bit to correct driveshaft angle.
    Quote Originally Posted by 7uptruckracer View Post
    I'm pretty sure your not meaning to say the whole balance of force is different LR to RR MAYBE slightly toward one way more then the other which that might be true it's not really even worth mentioning unless he's going to be drag racing especially when you're also suggesting he move his motor down which most you can't just "tilt" the motor back with central block mounts and midplates you can really only raise and lower which would be a significant change I've played with before trying to get my shaft height right and that also is not a compromise to make with that weight drop it in see what you feel and go from there
    I think if you go back and ready what JustAddDirt said, you would see that he said you generally have to move "the back of Motor down a bit" From where Im from that's the same thing as tilting. Didn't see anywhere in his post where he suggested to move the whole motor down.

    Looks like someone fell asleep during reading time....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Yes and I said the motors with midplates you can't just tilt the motor didnt I? By this theory it should also unload the RR on decel too correct so adding bite would just be a compromise

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    Yes, you can adjust height at mid-plate, if your mid-plate has multiple holes for height. My chassis builder has 2 holes in the mid-plate just for the type of rearend used.
    top hole QC
    bottom hole 9"
    And yes before you say it, it does twist the front motor mounts just a tick. But car does not know it, nor does motor.

    I guess 7uptruckracer, we can just agree to disagree here. I am not here to get into a pissing contest, just trying to help a guy out with his question.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Anyone have a link to support the rotational forces acting upon the rear end? You would still have the rotational force on the thru shaft in a quickchange, which would be the same as the pinion acting on a 9". I would think if you vectored all the rotational forces from one to the other there would be much of a difference. You still have the drive line in, and the tires to the ground.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Well we can agree his biggest change will be the pinion height so the Jbar will be different. That's going to be the most critical. I assume people want no binds in engine and midplate mounting that stuff cracks enough at the midplate mounts as it is.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustAddDirt View Post
    It has to do with the direction of force (downward pressure) applied to tire when the pinion gear tries to climb the ring gear. TorqueOn a 9" rear, or any conventional style axle, there is more pressure applied to the LR wheel on acceleration.Which is why on an open rear end, you punch the throttle to accelerate in a straight line, the RR wheel spins, even though motor torque tries to twist chassis and plant RR, it still unloads the RR tire.that is why a lot of drag racers add their battery to the right rear corner of their vehicle.On a qc, the pinion is on the back side of the axle, and on the opposite side of ring gear, so the torque applied when pinion tries to climb the ring gear more pressure is applied to the RR wheel.It has nothing to do with lockers, or spools.It has to do with torque, and the directional forces in which items react when power, or rotation is applied.That is why you have to add a bit of wedge to compensate, typically I add about 25lbs on a 4 link car.Just my opinion.
    thank you for stating this.... I am glad some can agree with me on this.... I have had customers with modified's including my own modified have issues with changing to a quickchange.... my own personal car after changing to a quick change has a ton more right rear drive and it mad the car hike up the entire rear instead of just the left rear. we had to change a lot to make the car drivable.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Mendon, IL
    Posts
    231

    Default

    I have a car built by a "big nut" and the set up sheet says 20-30# more LR with a quick change.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    leeracing40.
    driveshaft and thru-shaft do not matter, it is were the pinion contacts the ring gear, and the torque applied at that point, which makes the rotation forces that effects wheel weight.

    7uptruckracer
    sounds like you might need more ridged mounting of engine. If you are cracking and breaking stuff in the motor mount area might be other problems. Sounds like chassis builder needs to use something other than muffler tube, or thin wall elecktra-weld tubing...say DOM ,or moly.
    I have never had any problems with anything binding, cracking or flexing anything including the powercoat in the motor mount area.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    We get cracks in the ears that you attach your midplate to every now and then. We run Chrome Moly Tig chassis. Most manufacturers will not heat treat your chassis unless you ask and we have never bought them brand spankin new always a year or two old. I guess you don't find Rocket Chassis to be of good quality muffler tubing. Super Lates can twist up a good chassis.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.