Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    267

    Default NEW UPDATES / Blue front Rocket

    From fall of 2009 was there much of updates on the Blue/ grey Rocket. I heard something about the rack being raised like a inch and the engine also raised. Making the older racks not useable. Looking to see if my car is in need of change so it's a little more driver friendly. Had a bad start of the year and never caught up. The car is a real workout and was thinking of trying a chassis change. I ran the blue spots on the spindle and never tried the gray. I heard it slows it down a lot? The rack is a 3.3/4 Sweet and like a 230 servo I think with a krc pump. Maybe I just need to get back to the gym.

  2. #2

    Default

    A faster rack would help, most are 4.0 or 4.19 nowadays. Last year they raised the rack but not for drivability, just for ground clearence, it really is not necessary. Our old 09 car was great, just got beatup a bit too much.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    491

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wismadman View Post
    From fall of 2009 was there much of updates on the Blue/ grey Rocket. I heard something about the rack being raised like a inch and the engine also raised. Making the older racks not useable. Looking to see if my car is in need of change so it's a little more driver friendly. Had a bad start of the year and never caught up. The car is a real workout and was thinking of trying a chassis change. I ran the blue spots on the spindle and never tried the gray. I heard it slows it down a lot? The rack is a 3.3/4 Sweet and like a 230 servo I think with a krc pump. Maybe I just need to get back to the gym.
    I used to run a 4.0 with a 220 servo. I changed the pinion to a 4.5 and kept the 220 servo. I love it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    267

    Default

    I thought my (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word) was fast, I had a 3.0 in my Grt's. Wow guess i'm getting old. But I double checked and yea I have 3.75 with a 220 servo on one and a 235 or something on the other one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    267

    Default

    R.A.CK. is a bad word wow.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    267

    Default

    What about running the gray over blue?

  7. #7

    Default

    What do the numbers mean on the rack and servo? Is 4.0 or 4.19 the ratio? 230 the pressure in lbs? What is the effect of different combinations?
    Thanks.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,903

    Default

    The 4.19 is the number of inches the rack moves per turn and the .230 is this thickness of the torsion bar inside the servo that twists when the wheel is turned to direct the pressurized fluid to assist. The smaller the bar the more assist you have

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    267

    Default

    what is the turn. If i remember right the wheel will only turn 360 degrees lock to lock.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wismadman View Post
    what is the turn. If i remember right the wheel will only turn 360 degrees lock to lock.
    A turn is 360 degrees. The ratio is how much linear movement the rack has per one rotation of the pinion. Most higher ratio racks will top/bottom out before one complete 360 degree turn of the pinion. That's normal.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    267

    Default

    So. Just saying.... if mine turns 360 degrees with a 3.75 ratio. The 4.19 will only turn 300 degrees? Depending on the size of the wheel too.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,903

    Default

    The wheels turn the same amount with less input from the steering wheel ...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wismadman View Post
    So. Just saying.... if mine turns 360 degrees with a 3.75 ratio. The 4.19 will only turn 300 degrees? Depending on the size of the wheel too.
    Size of the steering wheel is completely irrelevant.

    If you go to a higher ratio, the wheel will stop turning (rack run out of travel) sooner (less than 360 degrees).

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    147

    Default

    size of the wheel is def not irrelevant...acts no different than a taller gear on a sprocket. takes less input to turn the wheel same amount as a smaller steering wheel would...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    It is irrelevant with their explanation. They are talking about one turn of steering as in how the racks are rated one rack turn not one steering wheel turn. The rack ratio is based off one turn on the rack. You physical steering wheel will turn different depending on size a 12" might go around a few times where a 17" wont. The Rocket Book tells you what servo and rack they recommend. Wheel choice is up to you but most run 17", 15" if they don't have the room

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7uptruckracer View Post
    It is irrelevant with their explanation. They are talking about one turn of steering as in how the racks are rated one rack turn not one steering wheel turn. The rack ratio is based off one turn on the rack. You physical steering wheel will turn different depending on size a 12" might go around a few times where a 17" wont. The Rocket Book tells you what servo and rack they recommend. Wheel choice is up to you but most run 17", 15" if they don't have the room
    Sorry but this is completely wrong.
    If a 12" steering wheel goes 360 degrees to max out a rack movement, then a 17" steering wheel will also go 360 degrees to max out the same rack. I'll bet literally any amount of money on this.

  17. #17

    Default

    Matt is right - The distance the steering shaft travels is not dependent on the size of the steering wheel. A larger wheel will make the final ratio slower because in 1 revolution a 12" wheel would move 75.36" and a 17" wheel would move 106.76" but it will not change how far the shaft travels from lock to lock.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,224

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by 7uptruckracer View Post
    You physical steering wheel will turn different depending on size a 12" might go around a few times where a 17" wont
    Wow........

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    831

    Default

    You guys have linear movement confused with rotation movement.

    The bigger the wheel the more your hand has to move to complete a revolution. The number of revolutions is constant when expressing a ratio in this discussion. There are two ways to accomplish the task of moving your hands less. You can get a smaller wheel or you can increase the ratio of the rack. A combination of both is most likely.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Thanks for the bashing I'm trying to talk about if someone is in the car and using their hands as a guide of how their rack has changed all the different explanations are confusing people myself included. I was trying to say a wheel is irreverent because it won't make a rack travel any more or less but your hands will change how much they move if you change wheel sizes.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.