Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570

    Default camaro lower on metric

    what is the advantage of putting a camaro lower on the rf of a metric chasis.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    not a direct bolt up.
    You would have to cut the rear a-arm mount off and relocate it to make the wider Camaro a-arm fit. (while watching your ball joint location so it does not get askew.

    been done, and it changes motion ratio of the lower from 25% to a 30% (have to change spring rate)
    widens front track width
    may make funny angle on spring, since location on lower moves.
    would make car steer better on entry.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Central IL
    Posts
    504

    Default

    Usually guys use Nova lowers instead of a Camaro lower. Close to same effect, just not quite as much work. I believe you also put them on backwards, i.e, right one on left front, left one on right front.

    You have to use a narrower, lighter rated spring diameter as well.

    I do not really think the gain made is enough though because I have never really seen someone change to different lowers and start dominating.
    #72W U.M.P Stock Car

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    72Dubya
    you are correct on the Nova side to side swap.
    you need to run a 5" spring instead of the 5.5"
    It will also increase your wheelbase by about 2"
    width by about 7/8 per side
    You get a lot more tie-rod angle with the a-arm change which will give you a lot more ackerman.
    If you have to run stock shocks I would think it would be tough to get the shock to live in the center of the coil, and on the angle it is on, but it could work great if the right combinations are put together.

    cheating up the Metric a-arms would be easier to do, and a lot less work.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Central IL
    Posts
    504

    Default

    Honestly, I do not really like the whole Nova deal. I am on all stock metric components, except we can run racing shocks with after market mounts and correct our uppers, and I am very competitive against guys with the "cheated" lowers. Honestly I think that people think it over too much with the whole front end deal. You can win with Camaro lowers, you can win with nova lowers, and you can win with metric lowers. It is all in how you apply what you have.

    I put quotes around the cheated because honestly I do not see it as cheating. I have not seen it give anyone in our division an edge over the other, just improvement on previous results.
    #72W U.M.P Stock Car

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Thanks for the replies

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    207

    Default spindle height differences from metric to chevelle to big metric

    i know the metric is short and trying to get camber curve to work is a job,just thought of taller spindles

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    207

    Default

    measured spindles and metrics are 7.5 while chevelles are 8.5 and impalas 9 .250
    Last edited by oldgold; 03-27-2015 at 04:58 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.