Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 70
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default Narrowing front end

    At the Duel in the Desert, there was a problem with some chassis with the stamped front end. It appears it was narrowed, what is the benefit of doing that and is that being checked on a regular basis? Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    305

    Default

    What chassis?

  3. #3

    Default

    more weight tranfer

  4. #4

    Default

    If they are checking for the Rt frame rail being rolled up to provide clearance, the next best thing is to leave it in the stock location and pull it in by narrowing the chassis somewhere else. Anything to keep those soft spring setups from pounding the ground with the frame rail.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    That's what I was told, not what I saw so I won't say chassis but it was several during pretech that had failed. I was thinking it was to keep rf from digging into the track and that's is what I was told by others too. Might be several chassis doing this since the turned up rf frame rail was outlawed a few years back. Thanks

  6. #6

    Default

    it was a combination of how they were turning the aftermarket clips and using aftermarket new lowers that very 3/4" where the lower ball joint location is. stock stuff passed tech with no issues even if they were turned within specs

  7. #7

    Default

    At Abilene this year, they measured in between the front horns. Where the idler arm and steering box mounts. Don't know if anybody got DQed or not tho.
    Bill W. and Dr. Bob......who could have known.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Thanks for the information, my information wasn't quite right it appears but there was a narrowing of frame rails I guess. That is why I wouldn't say chassis builder, could be a lot of chassis builders out of IMCA specs on that. I guess that would still not let rf frame rail dig into track to take the place of the turned up frame rail? Thanks again for the information.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9

    Default

    If the name of your chassis starts with G and ends with T you have a problem. Better call them up.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Tried three different a arms on my shaw, all put me at a little over 3/4 of an inch too long
    It's not just grt.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by charcoal01 View Post
    Tried three different a arms on my shaw, all put me at a little over 3/4 of an inch too long It's not just grt.
    Wheel base or track width? What measurement?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Balljoint to body mount measurement is supposed to be 18 3/8th with a maximum variance of half inch, so 18 7/8ths is the max. My car when first measured was 19 7/8ths. I had three spares including one deemed to be correct, which the "correct" one only got me to 19 1/2. Had to egg the heck out of the holes and weld washers on in order to be close enough. It's one thing to show up with a car you know you've cheated and have to fix it, it's another to believe you've bought a legal chassis only to find out otherwise and have to spend 4 hours in a pit fixing it so you can race. Pretty disappointing.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    545

    Default

    I've got a shaw. It didn't seem to hurt the performance too much after I reset the front end. Grt and shaw seemed to be the chassis everyone was fixing.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Charcoal, i had to do the exact same thing to my car. Took a hard hit after doing fix so i am just going to put on a new shaw front clip as several measurements are not to speck. Sure hope i don't have to do same to new clip. On another note when they measure at tech make sure a straight edge is put down thru hole and is at 90 deg so when they measure from zirt back, tape is level as there is a lot of difference if it isn't. JMO

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Kansas, The Land Of OZ.
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Let me help with this frame question, Pay attention STOCK CAR DRIVER. Because again the great tech at **** misses another frame problem. Yes a few years back "I" was the one who got the whole raised frame rail issue started when it was brought out in the open. And had more then one Chassis Manufacture that was not happy with me. That happened almost five years ago now. Now that all the fabricated frames have came into play the Chassis Manufactures just could not help themselves by leaving well enough alone, Now you guys ask why these fellas were all moving A-Arms back in the cars.......yes to the rear. Its not because the lower mounts were moved forward its because the frame has been notched in the center of the cross member and the entire right frame rail pulled in on the right side, which in turn moves the hole for the Lower Ball Joint placement back causing the measurement to be to long. So really they moved the A-Arm backwards but needed to move the entire rear frame rail back out. Why has this been done, because it gives more clearance for roll in the car on the right front.....does the same thing as rolling the frame up. Lets them run the 400 lb spring in the front and not get the frame in the dirt. To see if yours is turned in just measure the body mount holes on the frame, "T" on the chassis chart. We started looking at this at the beginning of this year. We looked at a lot of cars, and that is not all that has been found. I can tell you now this will get will get worse before it gets better. And no Im not saying what Chassis they are...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Kansas, The Land Of OZ.
    Posts
    66

    Default

    See I knew you would say something like that, Because its something you know nothing about. Do just a little home work and just check it out. You know sometimes there are others that do know more about something then you do. And so you know there have been several frames measured and YES they are moved, measured them myself and others who have measures them found the same exact thing I did. Tell you what, because you know more then a bunch of people I know, just call a few chassis builders and see what you learn, then get back to me and let me know if I was right.............When you do learn, The words are "Im Sorry you were right" LOL. Off to school you go..

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Haha he has an illegal car ^^^. Just sayin 👍BTW hood luck selling illegal cars. Never liked GRT and never will for more than that reason. Greed

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tripoli ia
    Posts
    32

    Default

    i guess the best thing about it that its getting teched and people are getting caught. Even if it was not know to them who bought the chassis. It lets people know who like to bend the rules just to sell cars. I would be pissed if what i bought was illegal and i didn't know about it.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stock car driver View Post
    Im not sure what I do to get all these loyal dips (fans) like ^^ and race productskkk as well as the others who seem to mainly post wanting to prove me wrong as if theres some big prize out there for the person who does that??!!
    Awww you missed me so you unblocked me ☺. That's love right there.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    305

    Default

    "You're", you uneducated CA pu$$

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.