Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Anti-Dive

  1. #1

    Default Anti-Dive

    whats too much?, too little?, pro's and con's, whats the basic theory?
    It's always the cars fault

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    490

    Default

    When I asked this of a well known chassis builder, we got into a discussion or pro-dive, anti-dive and zero-dive. After a lengthy discussion, it was basically stated that with the small tires on a modified and the inconsistent surface of a dirt track, that "some" anti-dive was fine. He felt thru their experimentation with it, there was not enough tire to create pro-dive and anti-dive was a safe given.

    My theory was to use pro-dive on the RF and anti-dive on the LF to promote roll and allow a stiffer spring on the RF than currently used so you could maintain better control of the roll. He felt the idea had merit but the small tires killed the idea.

    That said, mimic a production vehicle with your upper a-frame angles and go race.

    SPark

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    422

    Default

    The theory I heard was to run the A-arm level with no dive so that the springs and shocks do all the work. Many ways to go about it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    632

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.