Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 45

Thread: Davenport's car

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlatTire View Post
    How do you record data during racing? Thought that was against the rules!
    Indeed it is! I have heard others being accused of using it though.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Data Acquisition systems aren't that hard to see but doesn't mean hes not using it in testing. You can take those systems and upload them onto the pull down rig and tell alot.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    856

    Default

    Could it be the Penske dampner, like mbracer suggested, but with bumpstops instead of the mini spring?
    Lions don't worry about the opinions of sheep.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7uptruckracer View Post
    Data Acquisition systems aren't that hard to see but doesn't mean hes not using it in testing. You can take those systems and upload them onto the pull down rig and tell alot.
    It'd be pretty hard to pull off hiding it without a ton of work and it's not so much tech you have to fool as the other racers. Most of the time you get caught/found out cause of other racers and very rarely by the tech department.

    That being said, I'm gonna go off tangent here to say a few things:

    I know everyone wants to know the trick of the week or what others are doing, nothing wrong with that but you have to keep it in perspective. I just went and tested last weekend and tried several things, a couple of them are what davenport/bloomer are doing. Not going to give out much info here, but only one of them was worth anything on the clock. Granted different cars, drivers, tracks, and what not, but only one of them was worth a tenth and you could maybe argue a tenth and half.

    I guess my point is how many people are even anywhere that close to the times either of those 2 guys run???? Before you get overly worried about some of this stuff, you need to be able to consistently run real close to their lap times on a consistent basis. So concentrating on the basic's and driving until you get fairly close will pay more dividends then most of this other stuff.

    Just food for thought

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billetbirdcage View Post
    It'd be pretty hard to pull off hiding it without a ton of work and it's not so much tech you have to fool as the other racers. Most of the time you get caught/found out cause of other racers and very rarely by the tech department.

    That being said, I'm gonna go off tangent here to say a few things:

    I know everyone wants to know the trick of the week or what others are doing, nothing wrong with that but you have to keep it in perspective. I just went and tested last weekend and tried several things, a couple of them are what davenport/bloomer are doing. Not going to give out much info here, but only one of them was worth anything on the clock. Granted different cars, drivers, tracks, and what not, but only one of them was worth a tenth and you could maybe argue a tenth and half.

    I guess my point is how many people are even anywhere that close to the times either of those 2 guys run???? Before you get overly worried about some of this stuff, you need to be able to consistently run real close to their lap times on a consistent basis. So concentrating on the basic's and driving until you get fairly close will pay more dividends then most of this other stuff.

    Just food for thought
    ^^^
    My nomination for post of the month.
    We recently "tried some things" because I thought I was missing something...we did nothing but go backwards. We went back to basic setups and immediately came back toward the front. In my case, the driver needs a lot more work than the race car.

  6. #26

    Default

    I think we're getting off subject here. I don't want to copy it. I can't drive like Superman, he's been fast in everything he's ever been in. I'm just curious. They keep a lr on it all times and it's hard to see. It
    has a pivot and looks like a spring of sorts with chain going to the birdcage or tube, I couldn't see. The car comes thru the pits already down on the right side. The only movement is the left hike and a little movement on the left front.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    I've considered trying a spring rod on the LR upper to take some of the extreme rigidness out of the LR when the car is fully hiked. My thinking behind this is not to necessarily "soften" the LR as that is obviously where we get so much dynamic wedge but to help the LR tire conform better than just the sidewall will allow on choppy surfaces.
    Anybody else have thoughts on this or am I out on a limb?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tulsa america
    Posts
    2,686

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt49 View Post
    ^^^
    My nomination for post of the month.
    We recently "tried some things" because I thought I was missing something...we did nothing but go backwards. We went back to basic setups and immediately came back toward the front. In my case, the driver needs a lot more work than the race car.
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt49 View Post
    I've considered trying a spring rod on the LR upper to take some of the extreme rigidness out of the LR when the car is fully hiked. My thinking behind this is not to necessarily "soften" the LR as that is obviously where we get so much dynamic wedge but to help the LR tire conform better than just the sidewall will allow on choppy surfaces.
    Anybody else have thoughts on this or am I out on a limb?
    You already forgot about this post? I feel like "we" and "a lot" of teams the driver needs more work than the car

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    464

    Default

    Alot of us just don't have the time and money to go test "trick" setup stuff... the cheapest fix is to fix the driver.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by powerslide View Post
    You already forgot about this post? I feel like "we" and "a lot" of teams the driver needs more work than the car
    :-)
    Now that shouldn't stop me from wanting to experiment though, right? :-)
    The challenge with the last round of "testing" that we did was that I stuck with it too long. I went through a spell a few years ago where I would try something and if it didn't immediately work I would scrap the idea without massaging it at all. I was too quick to go back to what was comfortable. More recently, I over compensated and was stubbornly trying to make something work that just wasn't going to pan out. Part of the psychology of all this stuff is identifying when it's time to tap out. But one thing is for sure, you never learn if you don't try new stuff.
    Guys like Bloomquist and Moyer didn't get where they are running the same stuff everybody else has on. That's not to say that there is some secret setup out there but there is ALWAYS room for improvement.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tulsa america
    Posts
    2,686

    Default

    Bloomquist is testing every time he doesn't win so I don't see why you shouldn't test!

  12. #32
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,319

    Default

    5% of the drivers will win 85% of the races. There is a reason for that. There is no setup going to change that statistic.
    BUCKLE UP NOW, YA HEAR?

  13. #33

    Default

    "They say 60% of the world's statistics are made up right there on the spot, 82.4% of the people believe them wether they're accurate statistics or not. I don't know what you believe, but I do believe there's no doubt, I need a double shot of something 90 proof, I got to much to think about!" lol

    https://youtu.be/8ZWmbWrMwqo

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    There are three kinds of people in this world. Those who are good at math and those who aren't.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    831

    Default

    Statisticians and politicians all lie. More appropriately, Lie by omission of all the facts.

    Concerning data acquisitions systems, I follow USRA/USMTS and just this year outlawed in car cameras because they felt they were being used as data collecting devices and already expressed as illegal in the rulebook.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lizardracing View Post
    Statisticians and politicians all lie. More appropriately, Lie by omission of all the facts.

    Concerning data acquisitions systems, I follow USRA/USMTS and just this year outlawed in car cameras because they felt they were being used as data collecting devices and already expressed as illegal in the rulebook.
    I've often wondered about this. A lot of "data" can be "acquired" from video of your suspension.

  17. #37

    Default

    How much rebound at 6'' of velocity do you need to knock Erb off the bottom?

  18. #38
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by save the racers View Post
    How much rebound at 6'' of velocity do you need to knock Erb off the bottom?
    It's not rebound you need just some throttle % and some cojones (Grin)



    Quote Originally Posted by Matt49 View Post
    I've often wondered about this. A lot of "data" can be "acquired" from video of your suspension.
    Another rule that will be hard to enforce

  19. #39
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    856

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by save the racers View Post
    How much rebound at 6'' of velocity do you need to knock Erb off the bottom?
    $26,000 dollars worth.....knowing that 8 Hoosiers makes more traction than 4!
    Lions don't worry about the opinions of sheep.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,014

    Default

    In response to billets comment that it would be another rule that's hard to enforce. It would also be a rule that hurts the small guy while helping the well funded teams. A go pro is cheap vs taking Time off work, renting a track, and doing actual testing with real data acquisition.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.