Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 114
  1. #61

    Default

    rustymod,do you own a car or pay 100% of the bills???? running a crate is much much cheaper....the coupler and headers are the only thing different...take your current carb and send it to your carb guy and have it calibrated for a crate and he will get you real close......in what world can you run a open motor 50-60 races and get 2 thirds of your money back.....or even run a open motor 50-60 nights with out digging into her????? i agree it suck's for the local machine shops....but how can you go wrong with $5800,change the oil and look at the valve's once a month and not worry about her.....plus burn half the fuel......man this just terrible

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brett4 View Post
    rustymod,do you own a car or pay 100% of the bills???? running a crate is much much cheaper....the coupler and headers are the only thing different...take your current carb and send it to your carb guy and have it calibrated for a crate and he will get you real close......in what world can you run a open motor 50-60 races and get 2 thirds of your money back.....or even run a open motor 50-60 nights with out digging into her????? i agree it suck's for the local machine shops....but how can you go wrong with $5800,change the oil and look at the valve's once a month and not worry about her.....plus burn half the fuel......man this just terrible
    yeah got one and pay bills with open motor...assembled on my own after machine work. BTW did not change a single valve spring all year. All said and done might have 5k in motor total. running E85 no issues with fuel costs either. So tell me again how I would save money with a crate ? Ran fine all year long no issues and guess what when it needs rebuilt I will send parts off and do it all over again.....I dont need or want a crate.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    243

    Default

    strange...every crate racer I know is changing valve springs every 10-15 nights, and if you look in the crate late section of this board you will even see a post where racers are doing to the same thing


    http://www.4m.net/showthread.php?339...-valve-springs


    SCD if you got 60 nights good for you. I can typically get 40 nights without a rebuild, unless there is an issue. have gone longer but prefer to go at the 40 point to be safe and for performance. In general I have no issues with the crates but I am seeing more and more tracks not using water as much and not grooming the tracks to keep things dry...and this does help those running a crate. This I do not agree with. I want the playing field to be even but from what I see the spoiler and dry track on 1/2 mile is an advantage for crates.
    Last edited by rustymod; 08-31-2015 at 12:00 AM.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stock car driver View Post
    Rusty this your link is to a thread about a 602 that is NOT the crate ran in IMCA modifieds this thread is about!!!

    Heres a link to a thread about the actual crate used in IMCA modifieds.

    http://www.4m.net/showthread.php?349...behive-springs

    Ive been on way way way more heavy tracks this season than dry, around Iowa. Maybe they didn't get the crate memo you guys are always claiming is going around for track prep?

    I had 60 nights on that crate when I sold it with a car, it has about 100 on it now according to the new owner. And local late models around here that have ran the same crate but more rpm have ran them over 200 nights...

    the guys we pit next too have been changing every 10 nights with there IMCA crate....so I guess someone needs to enlighten them....

    I am happy with open motor and there are room for both in the class.

    the real culprit to ruining it for everyone are the UMP bmods where they are FORCING you to run a crate, with no other option, thus we have run no more UMP.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    169

    Default

    Local tracks are trying to get UMP to back off forcing us to run crates.. Lets hope it works out.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CsR41 View Post
    Local tracks are trying to get UMP to back off forcing us to run crates.. Lets hope it works out.
    this is great to hear ! We ran the Hobby Mod class at FALS and really like it. all the tracks around us are running UMP B mods which require a crate which is silly. Would really like to see track promoters get UMPs attention on this deal, not everyone wants to run a crate.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    169

    Default

    Our engine rules need a revamping IMO, some guys are 13:1 355ci.. But I agree, let us run crate or open.. and don't penalize the guys who want to run an open!

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CsR41 View Post
    Our engine rules need a revamping IMO, some guys are 13:1 355ci.. But I agree, let us run crate or open.. and don't penalize the guys who want to run an open!
    agreed, this UMP deal of adding more weight until all are forced into crates is just wrong, and glad to hear promoters are going to push back. UMP A mods are out of hand engine wise IMO, but crates only is not the answer either. at this point I am thrilled that FALS has an alternative at least.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    196

    Default

    crates work great when you can install all the parts you need..here is how.but just ask anyone there is no cheating in the crates lmao http://www.ebay.com/itm/602-Crate-en...9?roken=cUgayN

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Abbeville, Sc.
    Posts
    63

    Default

    The 4 link ruined modifieds!

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Kansas, The Land Of OZ.
    Posts
    66

    Default

    You know..... You hear every year that the guys running Crates have guys waiting in line to buy these things..... IF AND I MEAN IF this was true, WITH all the crate users out there now and as long as the Crate has been being used in racing now.... That would mean everyone racing would have a Crate by now.......AND THEY DONT. And as for DYNO TIME.....the guys I am talking about spend a lot of money on Engine Dynos... They try several sets of Headers, Carbs, Ignition, Fuel, and others to find every ounce of power.....And Yes these guys win a lot of races. And anyone who knows anything, Knows they don't give that Dyno Time away.... And now they find a cheated crate in East Coast Mods..... But they have a TEAR DOWN RULE.... And that's what needs done with the crates, TEAR THEM DOWN..... Now let the crate babies start crying.....

  12. #72
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SE MO
    Posts
    138

    Default

    RaceTechKs, your reference to guys spending a lot of money on dyno time in order to get everything out of their crate, is irrelevant. We have 2 open engines and 1 crate, all to run UMP b-mod, and we have spent just as much time on the dyno with the open engines as we have the crate. It doesn't matter which engine it is, we want to get the most out of it. I am not a fan of the crate personally, I do believe that the rules for us this season were pretty close with the 2 options. We won a lot of races with the open, but also got beat a few times by a crate.
    I can also add, we bought our crate directly from Weir Chevrolet in Red Bud, IL. Box stock, out of the crate with a good willys carb, beyea headers and Jones setup on the front, we had about $6000 in everything. After tuning the carb and timing, went 370rwhp, which is right in the ballpark of most built 355s that I have worked with.
    Last edited by stpmotorsports; 11-16-2015 at 09:02 AM.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,319

    Default

    Every racetrack you went to 25 years ago the track champion was an engine machine shop owner or someone who was in close cahoots with one. This brought on the buy it mentality. People wanted to compete and they couldn't because the guy building the engines was racing next to them every week. The "buy it to compete" era started.

    The crate is a decent thing for people with the means to "buy it". I've seen more people win because they actually have talent since the crate has been brought into existence. The crate has been a good thing for the "BUY IT" racers but a bad thing for the "MAKE IT" racer.
    BUCKLE UP NOW, YA HEAR?

  14. #74

    Default

    Just a little update. I started this thread because I was seeing a trend at our local tracks. Now I know it is true in our area after the season wrapped up. Two years ago we had 18 cars on average. This season we started with a 12 car average. 50/50 crate vs open. By the end of the year we were down to 5 cars all crates. As a promoter I would be worried.

    Basically what happened, one of the hold out veteran drivers finally bought a crate and won 12 in a row. With no claim or exchange or tech people got frustrated and just quit coming to the track. I get it at the big specials everyone runs a crate and that's fine but at a local level not everyone wants to run a crate and its killing the numbers around here.

    Its sad to say but I hung up the helmet after 20 years. If you don't have a sliver of hope for a win why be there. When I talked to Root about it I was told to go to B-mods because that sounds like all I could afford. Well we are racing for 400.00 to win why should we need to spend 50000 a year to race locally. I get it on the big specials you are going to have heavy hitters that are going to spend what ever it takes to win.

    Not sure what the answer is and I think the crate was the right choice short term to bring down engine costs but there needs to be parity between the open and crate. Its sure has turned into "buy it" class. When the mod class was developed it was to give an average guy a chance to race because late models got out of hand. Looks like history is repeating itself.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    746

    Default

    What is "killing racing" is the changing of the times. There is less interest from the younger kids than in the past. I teach junior high students and have for many years. There is a definite switch in their activities and interests. There is also a major change in family dynamics. Couple that with a change in economic times for many families and you can see the change. Movie theaters, amusement parks, etc... have all seen a down turn in their economics. This isn't a "sky is falling" problem. There are still many local tracks that are thriving. We have lost some also. The fact is that if we have drivers "retire" or stop driving and we don't replace them with someone, the field shrinks. I can go on and on about factors that are supposedly killing our sport, but I will stop. It is simple and always has been. Some will be faster than others. Some will spend more than others. Some will complain more than others. Some will work harder that others. Some will learn more than others. And some will stop and blame others. That is life!

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jasjenh View Post
    Just a little update. I started this thread because I was seeing a trend at our local tracks. Now I know it is true in our area after the season wrapped up. Two years ago we had 18 cars on average. This season we started with a 12 car average. 50/50 crate vs open. By the end of the year we were down to 5 cars all crates. As a promoter I would be worried.

    Basically what happened, one of the hold out veteran drivers finally bought a crate and won 12 in a row. With no claim or exchange or tech people got frustrated and just quit coming to the track. I get it at the big specials everyone runs a crate and that's fine but at a local level not everyone wants to run a crate and its killing the numbers around here.

    Its sad to say but I hung up the helmet after 20 years. If you don't have a sliver of hope for a win why be there. When I talked to Root about it I was told to go to B-mods because that sounds like all I could afford. Well we are racing for 400.00 to win why should we need to spend 50000 a year to race locally. I get it on the big specials you are going to have heavy hitters that are going to spend what ever it takes to win.

    Not sure what the answer is and I think the crate was the right choice short term to bring down engine costs but there needs to be parity between the open and crate. Its sure has turned into "buy it" class. When the mod class was developed it was to give an average guy a chance to race because late models got out of hand. Looks like history is repeating itself.
    good post pointing out that not all is perfect in a crate world. The other thing that I keep hearing is that promoters are altering track conditions to help crates, like leaving the track dryer some weeks. As some others have mentioned the worst situation is UMP B mods where they are forcing the class into crates as the ONLY option. I predict this will come back to bite UMP. At least with IMCA the crate is still only an option.

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,047

    Default

    Those UMP tracks will lose cars and spectators with a rule like that. No spectators, no concession or ticket sales. The tracks may want to consider going IMCA or USRA. The crate should be an option but not the only option, and the rules should give both an equal chance of winning. People by nature like to have choices.

  18. #78
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,289

    Default

    Car counts overall didn't change around here due to the crate. A track i race at struggled to get 8-10 mods. One show had a whopping 6 cars with 3 finishing the race. Motor is a small part of the expense of the mod.
    Last edited by stockcar5; 11-19-2015 at 04:03 PM.

  19. #79
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,319

    Default

    I hate seeing racing fall off and would basically support anything that brought more cars to the track and made it cheaper on a racer. Crates haven't been a bad thing but they are just a "buy it' solution. The days of going to the local junk yard and pulling out your SBC and taking it home and with a couple hundred bucks you have something to race with that could win are over. Has this been bad for the sport? Sure. Has it ruined the sport? heck no. People that want to race will find a way.

    I would like to see it much easier to want to race. The lowest class at the track costing 10 or 15 thousand dollars minimum to be competitive is just killing the want because people can't even experience it to know they want to. These 50 and 100 thousand plus dollar cars are killing the sport more than any crate engine ever could IMO.

    Back in the day a $1K set of heads would make you a top regional racer. Now everyone has that type stuff.
    BUCKLE UP NOW, YA HEAR?

  20. #80
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tulsa america
    Posts
    2,686

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by let-r-eat View Post
    Back in the day a $1K set of heads would make you a top regional racer. Now everyone has that type stuff.
    Most castings cost that much now days.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.