Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: Big purses??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sidney, Ohio
    Posts
    1,218

    Default Big purses??

    I was wondering why don't promoters spread the purse out more? I mean say a promoter wants to pay $100,000 to win and 2,000 to start. Why not pay $50,000 to win and 5,000 to start? As a fan I would rather see a purse like this.
    1 $50,000 2. 25,000 3. 20,000 4. 18,000 5. 16,000 6. 15,000 7. 14,000 8. 13,000 9. 12,000 10. 11,000 11. 10,000 12. 9,000 13. 8,000 14. 7,500 15. 7,000 16. 6,500 17. 6,200 18. 6,000 19. 5,800 20. 5,600 21. 5,500 22. 5,300 23. 5,200 24, 5,000

    Maybe non heat transfers get $1,000 C-Main non transfers $1,500 and B-Main non Transfers $2,000

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sidney, Ohio
    Posts
    1,218

    Default

    Would this get more cars at the DTWC or World 100 or Dream? Also a 1 day show?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,903

    Default

    So 300k just in A main pay .... And you propose 44k in b main pay and 33k in c main pay and then another 50k or so for heat race pay lol lol lol lol how much do you suggest pit passes and grand stand admission would be ??

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    444

    Default

    24th place thru 4th $3,ooo. 3rd-$10,000 2nd $10,000, 1st $17,000. This would draw as many if not more cars, $3,000 to start main, most of these guys will race for $800 or less to start any day of the week. My total purse is $100,000.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hucktyson View Post
    So 300k just in A main pay .... And you propose 44k in b main pay and 33k in c main pay and then another 50k or so for heat race pay lol lol lol lol how much do you suggest pit passes and grand stand admission would be ??
    You may want to check the current heat, B or C main pay. Nothing for heats and very little for b or c mains. But the guy does have the right idea... If one of these crown jewels were to increase the money back through the field it would help more teams rather than just a couple guys going home with more than expenses or less.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,312

    Default

    Who could afford to attend these grandiose purse races......NASCAR fans?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,903

    Default

    Why not just make it 10k to start and jump up 1k for each spot then 50k for second and 100k for first then give anyone who doesn't transfer 5k ????? Or is that too big of a drop ??? Maybe we can do 100k to win and 99,500 for last ???

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    8,464

    Default

    You'd have to charge a ridiculous amount at both gates to get anywhere near being able to pay that kind of purse at any dirt track in the country.

    And I don't think it would attract any more cars than what races currently get.
    Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

    Guerrilla Racing Junkies!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hucktyson View Post
    Why not just make it 10k to start and jump up 1k for each spot then 50k for second and 100k for first then give anyone who doesn't transfer 5k ????? Or is that too big of a drop ??? Maybe we can do 100k to win and 99,500 for last ???
    Hmmm you on to something there... 500 for 1 st and last place gets 100k

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    For the most part once you get over 30k you'll get the same cars no matter what you pay to win (provided there isn't another big race on the same weekend). I don't see why any late model promotor would pay more than $25k to win. The fans don't care what it pays to win, they don't get the money. What they DO know is, what it will cost them to go see it.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Littlestown, PA
    Posts
    1,691

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by latemodelman View Post
    I was wondering why don't promoters spread the purse out more? I mean say a promoter wants to pay $100,000 to win and 2,000 to start. Why not pay $50,000 to win and 5,000 to start? As a fan I would rather see a purse like this.
    1 $50,000 2. 25,000 3. 20,000 4. 18,000 5. 16,000 6. 15,000 7. 14,000 8. 13,000 9. 12,000 10. 11,000 11. 10,000 12. 9,000 13. 8,000 14. 7,500 15. 7,000 16. 6,500 17. 6,200 18. 6,000 19. 5,800 20. 5,600 21. 5,500 22. 5,300 23. 5,200 24, 5,000

    Maybe non heat transfers get $1,000 C-Main non transfers $1,500 and B-Main non Transfers $2,000
    Why not just give everyone who shows up $100,000 and a trophy? These tracks are just a charity after all there is no excuse for them to be keeping any of the money.

    Thanks,
    Jeff.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    240

    Default

    The race payout has very little to do with car counts anymore. What does affect the counts is the entry fee and non-transfer pay.

    Years ago you would go to a Hav-A-Tampa or Southern All-Stars race, and the entry fee would be $50 to $100, and if you made a lap for qualifying, started your heat race, and started the consi, you at the very least got your entry fee back at the pay window. Now days the entry fees are all $100 or more, and unless you make the feature, you get nothing back at the pay window.

    In years past, if you were a local racer and realistically did not have much of a chance to make the feature, you still took the car and tried because it didn't really cost all that much extra to race. Now days unless you have a feeling that you have a chance at making the race, you just leave the car at home when the touring teams come to town, and just go watch.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    444

    Default

    The payout thru the field has got to increase because of the cost of the cars. The cost of the cars racing dlm has no signs of going down. Someone please tell me if this information I'm about to tell u is wrong. I heard you can build a Nascar for Sprint Cup racing for $120,000, race ready. Now I know some Super Late Models Brand new race ready are at least $50,000. It is not hard to see what's wrong with this picture. Example Daytona 500 pay's around $50,000 for 43rd, last place. $50,000 for last place. In Nascar you could almost pay for the cost of the car in 2 races, in dlm, $1,000 to start it would take 50 races. The absolute ratio on Cost of Cars to money won in dirt track racing is mind boggling, it is so far off something has to be done.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,903

    Default

    What don't you understand ???? Late model racing is a fringe sport that's a hobby for rich dudes who want everyone to know how rich they are. Most of the fans live pay check to paycheck.... There's no way major corporate sponsors could ever see a return on investing in late models ... Tracks can't afford to pay anymore so like any other business you need to control expenses !!!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Central KY.
    Posts
    2,262

    Default

    How about if you can't afford to race, you pick another hobby? Or if you don't think you can compete for the first place prize you find another sport? I wouldn't compete in an event I didn't think I could win. I might go home in 2nd place or last place, but I'd show up thinking I could win until the checkered flag flew.

    I guess some of you won't be happy till we do away with a winner and just give everyone 10K for pulling into the pits.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    1,339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hucktyson View Post
    What don't you understand ???? Late model racing is a fringe sport that's a hobby for rich dudes who want everyone to know how rich they are. Most of the fans live pay check to paycheck.... There's no way major corporate sponsors could ever see a return on investing in late models ... Tracks can't afford to pay anymore so like any other business you need to control expenses !!!
    Winner.....Winner you are exactly right, I would dare to say that with the great year the Rumleys have had it is still a break even year...... Maybe.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    444

    Default

    Hucktyson, you say tracks can't afford to pay anymore. We know for a fact Portsmouth payed the WINNER $100,000 dollars to win last week. If that money was split and put thru the field it would keep a lot of small teams going. You could take that $100,000 and split it countless ways, in my opinion it's not done in the right way. And by the way if this sport is just for rich dudes to show off why pay anything?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waldo View Post
    Hucktyson, you say tracks can't afford to pay anymore. We know for a fact Portsmouth payed the WINNER $100,000 dollars to win last week. If that money was split and put thru the field it would keep a lot of small teams going. You could take that $100,000 and split it countless ways, in my opinion it's not done in the right way. And by the way if this sport is just for rich dudes to show off why pay anything?
    No Carl Short paid it. His a$$ was on the line.

    The winner was walking out of there with 100k.... Carl Short and Lucas guaranteed it. This isn't the 80s with the NDRA and Strohs girls. I know Lucas makes you guarantee the purse is gonna be paid well in advance of the event happening. Now if Short lost money on the deal... The 100k might not happen next year.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    444

    Default

    Next year they should pay $1,000 to win, this is just a sport for rich people, i"m sure they will get the same amount of cars.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    8,464

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waldo View Post
    The payout thru the field has got to increase because of the cost of the cars. The cost of the cars racing dlm has no signs of going down. Someone please tell me if this information I'm about to tell u is wrong. I heard you can build a Nascar for Sprint Cup racing for $120,000, race ready. Now I know some Super Late Models Brand new race ready are at least $50,000. It is not hard to see what's wrong with this picture. Example Daytona 500 pay's around $50,000 for 43rd, last place. $50,000 for last place. In Nascar you could almost pay for the cost of the car in 2 races, in dlm, $1,000 to start it would take 50 races. The absolute ratio on Cost of Cars to money won in dirt track racing is mind boggling, it is so far off something has to be done.

    There is no way you're going to build a competitive Cup car for 120k.

    Also, trying to correlate what dirt late models should pay based on what NASCRAP pays is the amongst the most illogical arguments I've ever seen.
    Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

    Guerrilla Racing Junkies!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.