Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Camaros can't get through the corner if their life depended on it. Simply a drive off car. Metric can get you the speed by carrying way more momentum. Love watching the "fast boy" set ups get smoked in the dry. It's hilarious.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    157

    Default

    Well said 7uptruckracer. LOL many setups other than the fast boy setup. I laughed all the way to the pay window many nights on those dry slick tracks watching the metric guys scratch their head wondering what happened. After getting through the corners quite well.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Just look at the pros and cons I've said it many time here. Metic con is the high rear roll center that inhibits sidebite. Camaro Leaf rear has low rear roll center good sitebite but that can hurt entry (if you don't make sure you free it up) the pro is they have good front end geometry but I will say its better for asphalt front end wise for what I try to do with them. The low rear roll center can shine in the slick but you have to make sure the good rear side bite is matched with good front grip because if you have to break rear traction to turn the car you are sunk which is what I see against the car I setup week in and week out. The rules are key to which is better. A Camaro with Jacking Bolt slider rears or even no sliders and aftermarket uppers in the front and maybe one other rule and I think it can really stand a chance to hurting a mertric with the same rules but a Stock metric link rear.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    key is rear toe in on the leaf springs. 75 up nova has more than Camaro, but manipulating it makes a world of difference.
    relocating the upper a arm mounts is also very critical to the whole package.
    taking out anti-dive is huge as well
    Ford parts on the GM also makes a large difference.

    lost of little tricks.
    I built one last year for a friend. if he had balls enough to drive it, it would not lose a race.
    he put another gentlemen in car that has a wining metric, and he said he has never driven anything like it. he now wants one built.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,336

    Default

    Ahh don't go telling too much now lol we work hard for our secrets


    Quote Originally Posted by JustAddDirt View Post
    key is rear toe in on the leaf springs. 75 up nova has more than Camaro, but manipulating it makes a world of difference.
    relocating the upper a arm mounts is also very critical to the whole package.
    taking out anti-dive is huge as well
    Ford parts on the GM also makes a large difference.

    lost of little tricks.
    I built one last year for a friend. if he had balls enough to drive it, it would not lose a race.
    he put another gentlemen in car that has a wining metric, and he said he has never driven anything like it. he now wants one built.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7uptruckracer View Post
    Ahh don't go telling too much now lol we work hard for our secrets
    mentioning it, understanding it, an applying it, are totally different worlds....lol
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    43

    Default

    hey guys first post here. glad to see an active forum about dirt racing. that being said, let me get into this one here... i have a nova - what we call hobby stock some call street stock. ( full stock chassis with regards to mounting points, stock steal roof, stock floor pan) we have alot of camaros, lots of nova, and a few metric coil cars. one coil car in particular come out this year ans started whooping our butts. i believe most of the leaf guys are using the same setup we have used for the last idk 10 yrs or so. so what can i do different??

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    185

    Default

    OK, lets take it one step further. I am the OP and since I made the original post, I bought a car. I bought neither. What I settled on was a 68-72 Chevelle. I am hoping the improved front geometry on the Chevelle will make up for the faults of the Metric and give me the best of both worlds.
    If your driving on the edge, you are trespassing on my property!!!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    43

    Default

    I was under the impression from previous posts the camaros were the best with the leaf rear and the better front end geometry
    LEAF SPRING NATION!!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Camaros are a thing of the past. Can't get momentum/center speed outta them. Ditch them and know how to set up a car at every corner and have it work for you. The camaros will bind up and simply suck through the center. Diamond corner car and that's it. Big half Mike stuff they get raped. Point and shoot they stand a chance but annoying when you're in a faster metric car through the center of corners.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    43

    Default

    we are seeing the same thing you just said about the camaro @dirt_Buster. i started with a camaro and soon found out they sucked everywhere but down the straights. very inconsistent. the nova however seemed to be everything the camaro isnt. we get good roll over and great bite when setup correctly. also 100 times more consistent it would seem.
    LEAF SPRING NATION!!

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    901

    Default

    Metric, Chevelle and Camaros will all work fine with the proper work done to any of them. However what we've found over the last 30 years trying each type is that the metric car requires a lot more attention, both on the front and rear suspension to be really good as well as a lot more time spent under the back end at the track adjusting things. The Chevelle front end is much better as well as simpler to get right. We've had much more success with the Camaros and have spent the last 10 years getting them right. The front ends are pretty simple to do with a little attention to the spindles and a-arms that you use. The leaf rears work well pretty much right out of the box and, if you run a Super/Pro type class like us that allows a lot of modifications, you can get all the forward and side bite you can stand and have a very consistent setup that will almost never get beat out of the corner by the others. Plus you will rarely spend your night at the track changing all your rear adjustments and, yes, a well built leafer will have adjustments. Ours has well over 30. As I hit the 3/4 century mark yesterday laying in the dirt at the track has less appeal than it did 50 years ago.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    901

    Default

    Marysville Raceway in CA runs a season ending all stock car show called the Taxi Open every year,everything from Pure Stocks, Hobby Stocks, Pro/Super/Street Stocks, Winged Super Stocks and Limited Late Models. Several guys, including us, run multiple classes. Leafs, 3 links, 4 bars and a couple of Ford 4 links are in the Supers and Winged classes. Last year we won the Pro/Super/Street main and this year won our heat in that division and were 2nd with 2 laps to go in the main and broke an axle, first one in over 30 years, so with the winged main up next couldn't fix it in time to start that one. Ran well in our winged heat with a sideboard though. With the season over for us (looks like our Thanksgiving race will get rained out) you might enjoy the Marysville highlights tape on their Facebook page. We're the black & yellow 4T for those who think leafs are inconsistent & lack bite. Enjoy and continue the debate.LOL

  14. #34
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wrenchead84 View Post
    we are seeing the same thing you just said about the camaro @dirt_Buster. i started with a camaro and soon found out they sucked everywhere but down the straights. very inconsistent. the nova however seemed to be everything the camaro isnt. we get good roll over and great bite when setup correctly. also 100 times more consistent it would seem.
    Nova's are better mainly because they have more toe in on the rear springs.
    I think 75 and up use the same geometry front end as the Camaro. but the leaf's are closer together in the front mounting.
    takes out bind that a Camaro has with the straighter spring stack.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.