Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 56 of 56

Thread: Ump

  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Burgettstown, PA
    Posts
    3,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by calverton View Post
    The track in question couldn't handle a woo show or a lucas show not enough stands plus it has in past ran very very late shows like 4 am shows
    They're putting in more stands and they ran a fine show when I was there. But those points aren't relative to this conversation.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    champaign il
    Posts
    5,271

    Default

    Farmercity was told that they would lose UMP if they ran a Lucas race when they just got UMP back....

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    3,734

    Default

    Sounds to me, that this track wants the advantages of being a UMP track and not do anything for it. There is no free lunch. The bad part is, in this area, if your not a UMP track, you don't have enough cars to run LM programs.There are more Late Models around, but they run for UMP points fund.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Burgettstown, PA
    Posts
    3,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bubstr View Post
    Sounds to me, that this track wants the advantages of being a UMP track and not do anything for it. There is no free lunch. The bad part is, in this area, if your not a UMP track, you don't have enough cars to run LM programs.There are more Late Models around, but they run for UMP points fund.
    I'm sure they pay a fee for UMP sanctioning. That's all they have to do for it.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    3,734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GEAR_HEAD View Post
    I'm sure they pay a fee for UMP sanctioning. That's all they have to do for it.
    Really? See how that works for them.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,591

    Default

    the track in question doesn't run late models weekly though

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    224

    Default

    I'd tell them I'm ump when I'm having ump sanctioned races. What I do otherwise isn't any of your business.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,591

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bubstr View Post
    Sounds to me, that this track wants the advantages of being a UMP track and not do anything for it. There is no free lunch. The bad part is, in this area, if your not a UMP track, you don't have enough cars to run LM programs.There are more Late Models around, but they run for UMP points fund.
    what ever happened to route 45 speedway think about that one

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,591

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chopter View Post
    I'd tell them I'm ump when I'm having ump sanctioned races. What I do otherwise isn't any of your business.
    sorry it don't work that way but nice try

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by calverton View Post
    sorry it don't work that way but nice try
    It does work that way. Deals are made all the time. It's the way the world works.

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,591

    Default

    I would say the sanctioning body has the upper hand don't you think look at route 45 changed sanctions and went belly up

  12. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    18,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by calverton View Post
    sorry it don't work that way but nice try
    What way, extortion?
    Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

  13. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,591

    Default

    read post 51

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    3,734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbecueboy View Post
    What way, extortion?
    You could very well call it extortion. It's been going on since the mid 40s with sanctioning groups and tracks or even racers. Look at the old AAA. If they scheduled a race anywhere, a driver would forfeit his points for the year if he raced anywhere else. I believe there was a stock car road race in Mexico once and several drivers raced champ cars or sprints that week end and lost their point money. USAC had similar rules. Looking at it from the other side, Sanctioning bodies need their tracks and drivers to cooperate in order to provide the product they offered. It's give and take, covered by contract law.

  15. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    18,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by calverton View Post
    read post 51
    Don't have time for the soul train word scramble aka your posts........sorry
    Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

  16. #56
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by calverton View Post
    I would say the sanctioning body has the upper hand don't you think look at route 45 changed sanctions and went belly up
    Any time you change rules, you take that chance. Not necessarily directly related to sanction.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.