Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Torsion bars

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default Torsion bars

    Obviously sprints use them and there is some debate in that world between torsion bars and coil-overs and I don't necessarily want to get into that debate. But I am curious if anyone has tried something like this on a late model or what people's thoughts are on why it would or would not work.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    831

    Default

    I'd imagine someone smarter than me could make it work.
    Torsion bars are more linear in rate than coil springs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lizardracing View Post
    I'd imagine someone smarter than me could make it work.
    Torsion bars are more linear in rate than coil springs.
    The bar is, but geometry is what makes it non linear.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    Dusty Chapman tried them in late 90’s at Brownstown and Twin Cities. I believe he modified a warrior chassis to use them. He was always thinking outside the box.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Interesting...I know Dusty and have raced with him quite a bit. I'll have to ask him about his experience with it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    He and his father were pretty smart folks. Always trying something different.
    Newer shock technology may lend a hand in getting it to work.
    From what I remember they tried it on the rear. Not sure if they tried on the front.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,102

    Default

    Was on one of Audie McWilliams cars a number of years ago. I actually know where the rear clip is believe it was on a early 2000 Rocket and if I not mistaken they made it illegal a number of years ago.
    Shocks by BGR army

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    I just found Lucas Oi rule 12.21.G. Springs must be made of steel. Torsion bars are not allowed in rear.
    And UMP/WoO rule 15.10.A.2. Rear suspension must utilize either coil or leaf spring.

    Neither say anything about the front. Now I'm really curious as to why that is.
    Last edited by Matt49; 11-11-2017 at 04:34 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt49 View Post
    I just found Lucas Oi rule 12.21.G. Springs must be made of steel. Torsion bars are not allowed in rear.
    And UMP/WoO rule 15.10.A.2. Rear suspension must utilize either coil or leaf spring.

    Neither say anything about the front. Now I'm really curious as to why that is.
    It's been in most sanctioning bodies rules for as long as I can remember, that they were not allowed and that is going back to the early 90's. Most just said no torsion bars but like I said it did vary some.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt49 View Post
    I just found Lucas Oi rule 12.21.G. Springs must be made of steel. Torsion bars are not allowed in rear. And UMP/WoO rule 15.10.A.2. Rear suspension must utilize either coil or leaf spring.Neither say anything about the front. Now I'm really curious as to why that is.
    Probably because they were stock on the mopars from the factory. Pretty sure some old Chrysler guys tried running them when the old 70’s cars were actually a late model car.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    thedirtysouth
    Posts
    4,014

    Default

    i remember a guy running a Plymouth duster in street stock several years back , the stock duster bar was to soft so he took a newport bar, which was to stiff and kept turning it down on a lay some how till he got it where he wanted it , he won a few races with it.......

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    We ran torsion bars at the old Waukegan Speedway back in the 60's when it was paved. Ran '57 to '64 Ford chassis... one car had four wheel bars the other just rears.

    That was back when your innovations weren't hampered by tons of rules.

    The cars were fast but not much faster than the guys on coil or coil/leaf suspensions. We had an 18" wide tire rule and those big meats made everybody quick if they had the horsepower. We ran big block Fords... the tunnel port 427 did blow away most of the Chevies but the guys I crewed with always broke something due to poor prep or maintenance.

    The whole deal for us was trying to get the unsprung weight down... then we bolted on a 100# tire/wheel....
    Member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame
    Class of 2019

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    Cool info, guys. Thanks!
    My thoughts on it are more related to how it would "free up" the shocks to work a little more efficiently. From what I'm told (and I believe it), coil-overs put a certain amount of side load on the shocks and that creates unwanted drag inside the shock. Maybe I should just consider trying hydraulic spring perches rather than redesign an entire race car.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    I would definitely go with the hydraulic spring perches. Before doing this definitely.
    I am thinking of working on a Canti-lever 4 link. Get the spring off the birdcage.
    I am a mod guy so nothing in my rules about it.(that I have ever seen)
    I am going to definitely work on one for the rf shock.
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    212

    Default

    cantilever just on the left side?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    What I had drawn up is actually nothing like a sprint car torsion bar system but more like the way F1 does it. Using bell cranks where the center of the bell crank is on the torsion bar. To me, de-coupling the shock and spring is really something to think about. We talk on here quite a bit about how some of the pavement stuff is slowly adapted into dirt. I follow F1 closely as this is where the real "cheaters" are in terms of people looking to take advantages where the rules don't exactly define things perfectly. Very cat and mouse. Late model racing is getting more and more that way.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Kennedy777 View Post
    cantilever just on the left side?
    Yes. That is my thought, lr only
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Looking back through some old threads and saw this. We will be assembling a cross torsion, 4 bar, open tube Super Saloon ( Kiwi Late Model) in the next couple of weeks. I got the chassis back from the powder coaters last week. This car is also set up to take a standard late model 4 bar coil over set up, closed tube, j bar etc. Our intention is to spend a day testing each set up and run with which ever is fastest. I will post some pics in a few weeks and would be interested to hear posters on 4m's thoughts.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,119

    Default

    Keep us posted...
    Member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame
    Class of 2019

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    273

    Default

    Matt.
    It isn't necessarily a "torsion" bar, but Danny Drinan built a system that was pretty successful. He put it on a UMP mod in the late 2000's and was successful with it. Unfortunately it's been outlawed by about every sanctioning body.
    http://www.dri-bar.com/

    From my experience in NASCAR with anti-roll bars I don't see method of making it work very well in the rear of a modern day late model. With all that said, I could see it working on the front. You would need to have a lot of bar "slack" to allow it to roll on the RF, and then time it to engage at the correct point. Then you could clip the RF travel with the bar and run a softer rate RF spring.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.