Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 136
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jensenracing18 View Post
    the fact that this is still even being argued about is just crazy to me... DONT GET OUT OF YOUR CAR and go after someone on an active racetrack.. problem solved and this wouldn't be an issue...
    Very good advise, but getting out of a racecar to, in some way, confront another driver because they believe they have been done dirty has been going on since before the days of Barney Oldfield and will go on until the last ever race is run and over with. I mean lets face it, emotion, passion (or whatever ya'll wanna' call it) and the willingness to act out in a bad way and to speak his mind is what endears Stewart to some folks, isn't it?

    The wheels of justice turn slowly, and it's a safe bet that it's Stewart's shyster lawyers that are stringing things along so don't be too quick to place blame for this being drug out over years.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    228

    Default

    The scary, far-reaching part, is this judge's interpretation. While the terms "recreational", and "professional" may be specific, legal entities in New York law, it sets a very dangerous legal precedent for all such venues/situations not just dirt racing, and not just in New York. The liability waiver, the one thing all tracks count on for such protection, was deemed null, void, and of no consequence. It's McDonald's hot-coffee all over again, and that's a game-changer.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleZero View Post
    The scary, far-reaching part, is this judge's interpretation. While the terms "recreational", and "professional" may be specific, legal entities in New York law, it sets a very dangerous legal precedent for all such venues/situations not just dirt racing, and not just in New York. The liability waiver, the one thing all tracks count on for such protection, was deemed null, void, and of no consequence. It's McDonald's hot-coffee all over again, and that's a game-changer.
    DZ, you make a very good point and one that most likely will come up in conversations among track owners, promoters and their legal counsel and insurance providers. It's a sure thing that it probably already has in some cases.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleZero View Post
    The scary, far-reaching part, is this judge's interpretation. While the terms "recreational", and "professional" may be specific, legal entities in New York law, it sets a very dangerous legal precedent for all such venues/situations not just dirt racing, and not just in New York. The liability waiver, the one thing all tracks count on for such protection, was deemed null, void, and of no consequence. It's McDonald's hot-coffee all over again, and that's a game-changer.
    I have been told all my life that paper was worthless by people in the legal field.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tn.
    Posts
    4,452

    Thumbs down

    Well the way I see it you can like it or not don't make a shiii to me.
    1ST from what I saw Tony never touched the boys car. The Ward boy hit the fence trying to give Tony room. He felt like he had been done wrong he was young and made a mistake that cost him his life. ( never go running at a car)
    2th I'm a old man and have seen a lot and done a lot....I'll never believe as long as I live he was smoking before the race. Had he smoked in the last 30 days ? Sure looks that way. lol If YOU did not see that boy smoking before the race maybe you should watch your mouth. There was a time when ever driver on the track was high or drinking. I'm seen them so drunk they would have to put them in the car and people thought nothing about it.
    Todays cars are so dang fast there is no way someone can smoke or drink with out crashing.
    I never smoked or drank on Sat....,,I work on my car ever night just to turn Sat. into a party. The party starts after the race.
    3rd.....The Ward boys family have to be some money hunger people to try to make money on there son's death. Maybe this explains the boy had such a short fuse.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    3,734

    Default

    The judge deciding the wavier was not legal, didn't give the go ahead to sue Tony, it opened the door to sue the track and sanctioning body. Yes, this could have impact on racing as a whole.

    Those waivers aren't worth the paper they are written on. The sign at your garage sale that says, not responsible, is worth even less.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,311

    Default

    "There was a time when ever driver on the track was high or drinking."

    You're as dumb as a rock!

  8. #68
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    358

    Default

    In Minnesota any motor vehicle accident that there is a death, be it a race vehicle, snowmobile, atv and or daily commuter vehicle they automatically take blood toxicology tests from all party's involved for evidence and it is admissible in court. I think this family is just going to make there son look like a bigger moron than he already was, it will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bubstr View Post
    The judge deciding the wavier was not legal, didn't give the go ahead to sue Tony, it opened the door to sue the track and sanctioning body. Yes, this could have impact on racing as a whole.
    I may be interpreting it wrong but the article I read said the judge ruled that since the waiver is null and void 3 of the 4 provisions in question within the wrongful death litigation are to remain as part of the litigation thus the go ahead by the Ward counsel to continue to pursue wrongful death damages.

    I would agree that the precedent has been established but had the judge ruled the other way the case becomes far more winnable for Stewart. At least that's the understanding I have of the article.



    http://nascar.nbcsports.com/2017/12/...ward-jr-death/

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbecueboy View Post
    Money grab.......had it been anyone but Tony, wouldn't even be discussing it.

    Sorry for the deceased and sorry the family is suffering because of his actions......but don't try and shift responsibility just because the man has money.
    Just about the money. And I being in my own business have been sued before , it dosen't
    matter about wavers in a court of law . Its how the judge sees it, final word.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    If you look at the video the car in front of Stewart almost hit Kevin ward he had turn the wheel at the last minute stay in your race car.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Realville, USA
    Posts
    16,671

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SLIDING SIDEWAYS View Post
    My theory is that TS tryed to kick up dirt and spray KW ans miss judged not wanting to hit KW. This comes from TS past aggresiveness. They were BOTH at fault and TS is using excuses to cover up his mistake. Other drivers on the track saw KW on the track and out of his car. If KW had no drugs in his system then would it be a different story w same results?
    Only TS knows and he will take it 6' under
    A man can't escape both his own conscience and God's judgement.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tn.
    Posts
    4,452

    Default

    This hole deal is just another example of living in todays times. Our safety man at work was giving a talk on driving and said there's no accident's on the road it's someone's fault. I stood and said B.S. the boys in my Dept. thought it was funny knowing all the years I'd raced and crashes I'd been in.
    People can't stand it when things happen ....... it must be someones fault.
    The Ward boys folks must be some sorry people. I just can't for the life of me can't see someone suing anyone at a track. Heck I've raced at track that when they needed a ambulance in was 28 mile's away and we knew it and raced. Was not a fire extinguisher in site. But that was 35 years ago.
    Like I said Sorry A people trying to make a dollar of there dead son. " Unbelievable "

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    18,112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Last Rebel 1 View Post
    This hole deal is just another example of living in todays times. Our safety man at work was giving a talk on driving and said there's no accident's on the road it's someone's fault. I stood and said B.S. the boys in my Dept. thought it was funny knowing all the years I'd raced and crashes I'd been in.
    People can't stand it when things happen ....... it must be someones fault.
    The Ward boys folks must be some sorry people. I just can't for the life of me can't see someone suing anyone at a track. Heck I've raced at track that when they needed a ambulance in was 28 mile's away and we knew it and raced. Was not a fire extinguisher in site. But that was 35 years ago.
    Like I said Sorry A people trying to make a dollar of there dead son. " Unbelievable "
    I'm sure any monies they get will be used to build a shrine in their sons and brothers honor and be put to good use in helping others in their sons honor and not used to buy themselves new homes, cars ,vacation condos and rolexes.

    Right?
    Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SLIDING SIDEWAYS View Post
    My theory is that TS tryed to kick up dirt and spray KW ans miss judged not wanting to hit KW. This comes from TS past aggresiveness. They were BOTH at fault and TS is using excuses to cover up his mistake. Other drivers on the track saw KW on the track and out of his car. If KW had no drugs in his system then would it be a different story w same results?
    Only TS knows and he will take it 6' under
    You say other drivers on the track saw KW on the track and out of his car BUT he was not walking towards their car, he was waiting for Stewart to come back around the track and then he started to walk towards Stewart,s car. Big difference between standing by your car and walking towards a moving race car...

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Last Rebel 1 View Post
    People can't stand it when things happen ....... it must be someones fault.
    The Ward boys folks must be some sorry people.
    Like I said Sorry A people trying to make a dollar of there dead son. " Unbelievable "
    Is it a safe assumption that you have met and spent enough time with the Ward family to pass such judgement? Please tell us all how you came to know these people well enough to label them as sorry ass people out for nothing but a chunk of Stewart's money.

    Quote Originally Posted by NY DIRT View Post
    You say other drivers on the track saw KW on the track and out of his car BUT he was not walking towards their car, he was waiting for Stewart to come back around the track and then he started to walk towards Stewart,s car. Big difference between standing by your car and walking towards a moving race car...
    The sworn testimony of Jessica Zemken-Friesen, who by the way was the first car behind Stewart at the point of impact with Kevin, paints a bit of a different picture. Please read the transcript of Mrs. Friesen's deposition, and try to read and absorb it with an open mind as opposed to preconceived notions. She actually saw what led up to, and the actual impact that killed Kevin Ward Jr.

    I was desperately hoping and cheering for Stewart Friesen to win the NASCAR truck race at Eldora last July. The trophy presentation from Stewart to Friesen and his wife in victory lane would have been one of the most awkward, interesting and juicy things ever to be broadcast on live television! LOL!

  17. #77
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CIRF View Post
    Is it a safe assumption that you have met and spent enough time with the Ward family to pass such judgement? Please tell us all how you came to know these people well enough to label them as sorry ass people out for nothing but a chunk of Stewart's money.

    The sworn testimony of Jessica Zemken-Friesen, who by the way was the first car behind Stewart at the point of impact with Kevin, paints a bit of a different picture. Please read the transcript of Mrs. Friesen's deposition, and try to read and absorb it with an open mind as opposed to preconceived notions. She actually saw what led up to, and the actual impact that killed Kevin Ward Jr.

    I was desperately hoping and cheering for Stewart Friesen to win the NASCAR truck race at Eldora last July. The trophy presentation from Stewart to Friesen and his wife in victory lane would have been one of the most awkward, interesting and juicy things ever to be broadcast on live television! LOL!
    A jilted lover's testimony? We saw the tapes.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NY DIRT View Post
    You say other drivers on the track saw KW on the track and out of his car BUT he was not walking towards their car, he was waiting for Stewart to come back around the track and then he started to walk towards Stewart,s car. Big difference between standing by your car and walking towards a moving race car...
    What i was refering to was KW was hard to see on track w his blk suit on is what i believe TS stated somewhere
    THE REAL SLIDING SIDEWAYS!

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
    A jilted lover's testimony? We saw the tapes.
    Jilted lover? LOL! I will pose this question once again. Is this woman going to blatantly perjure herself and risk jail time and tens of thousands of dollars in fines just to get back at Tony Stewart? Could it be that she's telling the truth and some folks are desperately looking for a reason to debunk her sworn testimony? These shyster lawyers and judges take perjury quite seriously. Besides that she seemed to have got on with her life. She's since married, isn't she? She actually married a guy that doesn't go 275 and headed for 300. LOL!

    Jilted lover? That smacks of being nothing more than a cop out from someone that appears to be in denial regarding what an eye witness saw.

  20. #80
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,311

    Default

    "You say other drivers on the track saw KW on the track and out of his car BUT he was not walking towards their car, he was waiting for Stewart to come back around the track and then he started to walk towards Stewart,s car. Big difference between standing by your car and walking towards a moving race car..."

    He was walking down the track and away from his car because the car in front of Stewart had to turn to the left to avoid hitting the kid. He also grabbed the wing on Stewart's car because when he was kicked away from the car, the wing springs back up. Looked at the video many times.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.