Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5,046

    Default Vic Hill discusses the evolution of dirt racing engines

    https://insidedirtracing.com/vic-hil...acing-engines/

    The noted engine builder and racer talks about the increase in horsepower over the years and the increase in costs to make it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    266

    Default

    Not trying to Bash Mr. Hill, who I'm sure is a very intelligent engine builder and driver, but really what does he tell us in this interview that we didn't already know? All he really says is that engines have gotten more powerful and more expensive. I don't think that's much of a surprise to anyone. And yes, it true in all forms of motorsports, not just DLM. Look at drag racing, where in Pro Mods they are running right at 1000 Cubic inch displacement nowadays and that's combined with nitrous! Interestingly enough, the clases in drag racing where engine innovation has slowed down to the point of being almost non-existent, are the Nitro classes. Why? Probably because at 11,000 HP, they have way more horsepower than they can hook up to the track. So, trying to make more is kinda pointless. Maybe there's a hint there! No, I'm not suggesting that they need to put top fuel motors in DLM cars. That would be ridiculous. However, perhaps the way to address the issue of escalating engine cost is to come up with a package of not just engine, but tire, chassis, and engine that would have a fair bit more power that you could hook up to begin with. Then the need to chase a few extra HP here and there, might disappear.

    All Mr Hill has to offer us here is the suggestion for the problem of escalating cost seems to be "to think really hard when you make your rules." Again, that does tell us much. His comments read more like an advertisment for his own engines than anything else. And he even contradicts himself.

    Hill adds that the marketing that came from the NASCAR side of things was successful in convincing those with the resources to believe that they had to have that particular brand.

    “I build more Chevrolets than Fords but they did a good job marketing and so a lot of people who race and are financially able to buy them felt like they had to have one,” Hill said. “Then you feel like you’ve got to have that to compete, and at a lot of places it does make a difference especially in qualifying.”
    If it's all just marketing, how does it make a difference in qualifying at a lot of places?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,930

    Default

    SLMs already have more power than usable 90% of the time. Small carbs, restrictors, running on 2bbls etc etc in the Feature now days is the norm, anywhere the track is slick and dry. Although when the water is in the track you need that power, your a sitting duck without it. There very hard to drive with all the power in the slick if you do not back tune them pretty heavily.

    I am afraid the costs are only going to rise as well, with the addition of 3D Printing. You can print new designs that really lighten a part, such as pistons etc, that take a lot of weight out, and that means more power. Add to that some of the new exotic materials.

    Harder tires, controlled at the MFR, and smaller Aero package is the only hope at this point.

    Just say no...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    685

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by Kromulous View Post
    SLMs already have more power than usable 90% of the time. Small carbs, restrictors, running on 2bbls etc etc in the Feature now days is the norm, anywhere the track is slick and dry. Although when the water is in the track you need that power, your a sitting duck without it. There very hard to drive with all the power in the slick if you do not back tune them pretty heavily.

    I am afraid the costs are only going to rise as well, with the addition of 3D Printing. You can print new designs that really lighten a part, such as pistons etc, that take a lot of weight out, and that means more power. Add to that some of the new exotic materials.

    Harder tires, controlled at the MFR, and smaller Aero package is the only hope at this point.
    Wedge 2.0 needs to die or else its going to eat itself. Its past time for Frankenstein's monster to go, they killed him once before and the result was awesome. Its time to do it again, in ALL the DLM classes. Un-Hook the cars...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Exactly. Just like in sprint cars, engine costs are crazy. The only way to scale them back will be to unhook the cars. Harder tires, narrower tires, less wedge, eliminate some of the aero, etc......

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Marion, IA
    Posts
    1,691

    Default

    Harder tires just means more soaking.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CageFaraday View Post
    Wedge 2.0 needs to die or else its going to eat itself. Its past time for Frankenstein's monster to go, they killed him once before and the result was awesome. Its time to do it again, in ALL the DLM classes. Un-Hook the cars...
    Could not agree more, it’s overdue but no one wants to step up and do a thing about it. Some think the cars look better than ever, that’s great till you only have a traveling series to go see the cool looking cars. Personally, I think they are ugly. They are so bent and twisted that they look like they’ve been wrecked.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Frazeysburg, Ohio
    Posts
    368

    Default

    If only we could go back to 95 or 96

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Frazeysburg, Ohio
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Hell there were 95 cars at the 2005 Ice Bowl. What's the last race to have 90+ cars?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PRCKartRacer9 View Post
    Hell there were 95 cars at the 2005 Ice Bowl. What's the last race to have 90+ cars?
    World 100. Which very soon, they will be lucky to hit that. Things do need to change, Cage, Krom, pretty much anyone who thinks less aero, harder tire, possibly narrower tire, no more wide bores, you guys are definitely on target. Just actual late models with normal bodies. Far away these look cool, up close, they look like they were put in a frame bender and tweaked a lot. Oh, and follow the rules ALREADY IN PLACE WOULD BE A GREAT START.
    Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    The land of Irma
    Posts
    3,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PRCKartRacer9 View Post
    If only we could go back to 95 or 96
    No wayyyyyyy.....the racing today is farrrrrr better!
    Turn LEFT, Vote RIGHT!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Posts
    3,080

    Default Jabberjaws

    Amen brother...most peopl think in present time the cars look cooler than they ever been, but ten years later they look out dated, which they are. But when we look back 10 years from now these will be the ugliest dlm car in history. Bodies grossly manipulated, rf sticking out 2 miles...puke

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Illtsate32 View Post
    Amen brother...most peopl think in present time the cars look cooler than they ever been, but ten years later they look out dated, which they are. But when we look back 10 years from now these will be the ugliest dlm car in history. Bodies grossly manipulated, rf sticking out 2 miles...puke
    These RF still stick out 2 miles, they just have longer noses and elephant ears to cover them out. Take a real hard look at the cars sometime. No dirt oval car needs a RF nose clearance of 15 inches. That amount of travel is for off road

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    701

    Default

    what is the background on Vic Hill ? How did he get the financial resources to start an engine building business ? Where did he get the knowledge to build engines ? How long has he been building engines ?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mod Runner View Post
    what is the background on Vic Hill ? How did he get the financial resources to start an engine building business ? Where did he get the knowledge to build engines ? How long has he been building engines ?
    He worked for RCR for years. I believe he got fed up with the grind and probably wanted to be his own boss. He does off road truck motors too.
    Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

  16. #16

    Default

    Vic is also one of the first that had all the knowledge to help you with Davis Technology stuff. Vic is smart!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    8,462

    Default

    He's partly responsible for the engines getting so out of control cost wise.

    Although aero does need to be reigned back in. You could fix a lot of the aero issues without significantly changing the look of the cars. Make the nose and ears symmetrical and straight , make the body straight and flat from front to rear, which would lead to a flat deck, fill in the sails and cut the spoiler down to 6". basically, Basically, take it back to '05 or so and take a little spoiler off of them.
    Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

    Guerrilla Racing Junkies!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    thedirtysouth
    Posts
    4,014

    Default

    you would also have to take all the modern rt frt suspension tech away as well , aint gone happen........

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    8,462

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fastford View Post
    you would also have to take all the modern rt frt suspension tech away as well , aint gone happen........
    The tech wouldn't go away, but you really couldn't get as radical if you're going to roll the nose under literally every lap. If the nose is mounted dead straight, the clearance on the right side is only going to be 6-8", even with a shaved valance.
    Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

    Guerrilla Racing Junkies!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Eastern Pa
    Posts
    1,095

    Default

    How close in price are the big name late model engine builders, i.e. Durham, Clements, Cornett, Pro Power, Vic Hill, Jay D*ckens, etc.? Are they all fairly the same or are a few of the above a lot more expensive?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.