|
|
-
rollsteer/stagger
Anyone know a mathematical formula for finding the correct stagger correlating with the steer angle of the rearend?
-
Originally Posted by ZERO25
Anyone know a mathematical formula for finding the correct stagger correlating with the steer angle of the rearend?
Can't be done. Angle = turn forever.
Modern Day Wedge Racing
Florence -2
Atomic - 2
-
Originally Posted by MasterSbilt_Racer
Can't be done. Angle = turn forever.
Surely in this age of technology,some engineer somewhere has attempted to calculate this!
-
Originally Posted by ZERO25
Surely in this age of technology,some engineer somewhere has attempted to calculate this!
All it does is dog walk the car. Now days, the car mostly staying hiked. If it don't set down, it's always skewed the same amount, so it isn't steering.
Modern Day Wedge Racing
Florence -2
Atomic - 2
-
I would find it hard to believe, back when the Cup cars were doing it, that some of the engineers hadn't researched the idea.
-
“Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man.” — The Dude
-
The direction the axle is pointing relative to the car doesn't change the amount of stagger required to get a solid axle to roll through a corner.
-
But the stagger does change the amount of input needed from the front to control where the car wants to go due to the direction in which the axle is pointing.
-
You can indeed calculate the turn radius with a given amount of rear steer. You can also calculate the turn radius with a given amount of stagger.
It is not a 1:1 relationship and there are no optimal ratios. Of course they do not act independent of each other, but there is also no magic answer. The optimal rear steer and stagger depend on track conditions, vehicle setup, and driving technique.
If you want a way to determine your turn radius or understand any characteristics on your car I have built a dirt late model/modified simulation program that has that calculation included in it. I am working with a few guys to work the bugs out of it. I would sell it to a select few people as beta testers if interested.
-
a lot of thought has changed with the amount of dynamic roll steer these cars have today , we are on 1/2 and sometimes less stagger than we were 10 years ago.....
-
I also think it's just important to keep in mind that stagger and rear steer accomplish two completely different things. Stagger is helping the rear of the car make a turn radius around the corner without scrubbing the tires. Rear steer is helping the entire car (not rear end only) make it around the corner without laterally sliding the rear end.
-
Question: are you guys a set the stagger and forget it, or adjust it to get the car to do whatever better?
I always considered setting it per the track, and keep it consistent, but over the years have wondered.
Also It seems a certain amount of tire scrub is needed to make more traction via less or more stagger. It seems like the modern way is to run a lot less stagger, and more rear steer like Fastford said but why is the question? trying to create more tire scrub against the track?
Example would be to have enough rear steer and stagger to make the car go around a corner with the least amount of scrub etc, the most efficient. Then take out / add stagger out to add or subtract some tire scrub. I know there will be considerable tire scrub from the effects of cornering to begin with, side load etc.
Last edited by Kromulous; 10-17-2018 at 03:32 PM.
-
Originally Posted by hotshoe65s
You can indeed calculate the turn radius with a given amount of rear steer. You can also calculate the turn radius with a given amount of stagger.
It is not a 1:1 relationship and there are no optimal ratios. Of course they do not act independent of each other, but there is also no magic answer. The optimal rear steer and stagger depend on track conditions, vehicle setup, and driving technique.
If you want a way to determine your turn radius or understand any characteristics on your car I have built a dirt late model/modified simulation program that has that calculation included in it. I am working with a few guys to work the bugs out of it. I would sell it to a select few people as beta testers if interested.
CP Furney years ago published a table for determing stagger based on banking angle and rear track width. He also believed you had to add a certain % to that based on certain track conditions and reduction of tire circumference due to weight transfer.
-
I think any scientific calculation of what is required is thrown out the window by the track not being perfectly smooth and the track not having even consistent traction from top to bottom and the cars sliding and wheel spinning. This is not asphalt. According to all of you Kevin rumley is the smartest guy on the entire planet and snort is the best driver and the have the best funded operation .... Only the last of which do I consider true but point being there are plenty of races where he is not a factor , if the “ smartest guy on planet earth “ is unable to harness the power of these scientific calculations to produce consistently dominate results you have to conclude it’s not possible
-
I think huck hit the nail on the head. People forget rumley was a racer long before he was a engineer. No denying the data helps but we're all still racing on a ever changing surface with mother nature fighting us every step of the way. That's what makes this sport better than all the rest the challenge!
-
even though we use less stagger , it is still important , we just make a lot less change than we use to , its all about tuning and staying up with the track , if you can turn the car through dynamic roll steer and use less stagger , you will pick up straightaway speed and be smoother entering the turn , which is where a lot of speed has been gained lately , the old train of thought where you enter the turn with the car flat required a lot more stagger to make the car turn when you picked up the throttle , but it made the car harder to control getting in , which usually meant having to run a lot more rear brake to get in.....
-
I think any scientific calculation of what is required is thrown out the window by the track not being perfectly smooth and the track not having even consistent traction from top to bottom and the cars sliding and wheel spinning. This is not asphalt. According to all of you Kevin rumley is the smartest guy on the entire planet and snort is the best driver and the have the best funded operation .... Only the last of which do I consider true but point being there are plenty of races where he is not a factor , if the “ smartest guy on planet earth “ is unable to harness the power of these scientific calculations to produce consistently dominate results you have to conclude it’s not possible
THAT MIGHT BE YOUR PROBLEM!!!
Since you don't believe dirt racing is a science, maybe that's the reason you got lapped in a 10 lap heat race!
-
Where was your car big boy? Can't believe how many have attacked him for trying world 100. Then have stupidity to bring that (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word) here to most respectable forum in all of 4m. Now please go back to where you belong and it isn't here
-
Originally Posted by Jim11h
Where was your car big boy? Can't believe how many have attacked him for trying world 100. Then have stupidity to bring that (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word) here to most respectable forum in all of 4m. Now please go back to where you belong and it isn't here
keyboard warrior ^^^^^, you might wanna study your 4m history and you'll find out why everybody gives Jonny boy a bunch of crap!
Ask him about boasting to someone with half the equipment he has, and got beat like a drum at Eldora a couple of years ago!
-
Yes my 2016 pierce car that I cut all of the mounts off and changed everything in my garage with a jig saw , tubing bender a welder and drill press with a standard bore 430 and 3 differnt brands of shocks, never been on a pulldown rig or anything just done wig plumb bombs angle finders and string lines that I have raced a total of 6 times now including eldora..... completely on my own to decide every adjustment and completely on my own to pay every bill while running a company that takes 70-80 hours a week of my time. What’s described above is definitely double the equipment most people take to eldora ..... yes considering all of that I was clearly the odds on favorite to take home the globe ..... it’s amazing I didn’t win that race ....
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.
|
|
Bookmarks