Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1

    Default Parallel LR Bars

    Looking at a good starting point on angles and lengths to run the lr parallel bars? Doing some updating on a black front rocket with 604 crate. Still need to have 4 1/2” separation top and bottom?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    You don't have to have 4.5" separation. Other stuff will work and might be better. Once you head down the path of altering the geometry, there are limitless possibilities. Some will be better at certain times than others. No one who has something outside the box is just going to give it to you. Setting the bars at say 17" each with the average angle of your original setup will yield decent results.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  3. #3

    Default

    Maybe I’m way behind on something, but what’s the theory on running the bars parallel? As the birdcage rotates they wouldn’t stay perfectly parallel anyway. Just trying to stay close?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    172

    Default

    They wouldn’t stay parallel if they weren’t to begin with. Running them parallel would negate any effects that indexing or “the hook” (spring behind) would have.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    Basecircle, If the bars are parallel, there is no rotation. As Austin stated, no rotation leaves you with linear travel (axle vs spring deflection) instead of a digressive deal. That may or may not prove to be an issue as far as "getting on the bars".
    Last edited by MasterSbilt_Racer; 04-29-2019 at 09:57 AM.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  6. #6

    Default

    never mind. I was thinking too hard (or not hard enough maybe). I’m so used to the birdcage index changing with travel that I couldn’t imagine it NOT. Had to draw it on paper. Just a parallelogram that the angles change with suspension movement/hike. Thank you!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    399

    Default

    That long LR lower/lack of index can make the car real lazy getting up....better have some serious preload...or good traction.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,123

    Default

    The bars starting parallel will only result in no rotation/indexing if the bars are the exact same length...which is rarely if not never the case. Not sure if that was implied somewhere that I missed but thought it was worth mentioning.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt49 View Post
    The bars starting parallel will only result in no rotation/indexing if the bars are the exact same length...which is rarely if not never the case. Not sure if that was implied somewhere that I missed but thought it was worth mentioning.
    Good point. I made the assumption, but didn't state it.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CCHIEF View Post
    That long LR lower/lack of index can make the car real lazy getting up....better have some serious preload...or good traction.
    Be a good place for a "spring" that had a very low rate, meaning the load doesn't drop off much with extension travel. Wonder where a guy might get something like that?
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  11. #11

    Default

    The few that I have seen are running the left lower down on the cage around 5 1/2”

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,930

    Default

    Running the lower bar, lower down on the cage would make for some indexing, if the top was 4.5 and the bottom was 5.5". I guess it would make the indexing in a bell curve fashion, really index the cage as the bottom of the travel, the last couple inches of travel the BC would really try to cam FWD.

    Swartz Chassis that we're running now is a 17" bar car, top and bottom on the LR. I have never tried this adjustment but i might soon. I am running the bars more parallel than i ever have, but finally got my shocks valved up to have enough compression. So will see how it work soon, if it ever stops raining !

    Just say no...

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kromulous View Post
    Running the lower bar, lower down on the cage would make for some indexing, if the top was 4.5 and the bottom was 5.5". I guess it would make the indexing in a bell curve fashion, really index the cage as the bottom of the travel, the last couple inches of travel the BC would really try to cam FWD.

    Swartz Chassis that we're running now is a 17" bar car, top and bottom on the LR. I have never tried this adjustment but i might soon. I am running the bars more parallel than i ever have, but finally got my shocks valved up to have enough compression. So will see how it work soon, if it ever stops raining !

    4.5 separation? Just added more angle on lower by going up on frame?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,930

    Default

    Well, most BC's are 4.5" on the top and bottom, the BSB ones i run you can run the bottom bar lower by 1/2 inch at a time. So you could run the lower at 5.5" I have never done it thou. I have heard it will help crate cars turn in better, but that is just what i have heard...

    Anytime you introduce a bias with the connection points, meaning one point is closer or further from C/L, you will get some sort of change during travel.

    Just say no...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.