Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 48
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    162

    Default WoO officials are a bunch of Jackwagons!

    Last night Dennis Erb, jr. is "Disqualified" for not going to tech for the "Droop rule" and is delegated to last in the feature rundown. Tonight Darrell Lanigan" FAILS" the "droop rule" and doesn't even get penalized out of the front row. Could you WoO officials be any dumber. Please ! Go ahead and try!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,380

    Default

    please tell me its a lie, he should have been sent to the b-main, fail goes to the rear if last night was the standard

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    @ the track
    Posts
    12,321

    Default

    docked a few positions in qualifying was all
    8/13/16

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    4,418

    Default

    There’s a rule in place for the droop rule. Docked 3 positions. And that puts him 4th...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    @ the track
    Posts
    12,321

    Default

    If that's all the penalty is, might as well run illegal in qualifying, time up front and accept the penalty. If the droop hike is that much of a advantage, it's kind of a no brainer till WoO change their rules and that will be coming soon I'd imagine.
    8/13/16

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    528

    Default

    The rules was followed exactly as is it was supposed to be. The penalties for failing the drop rule was plainly stated at the beginning of the season. The night before at drivers mmeting the drivers were told the winner must come to tech area after crossing scales. Erb didnt do that
    Last edited by tsand; 02-13-2020 at 07:59 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    980

    Default

    The Stranger: Somebody left the door open and the wrong dogs came home.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    528

    Default

    The drop rule is so much as a perfomance rule bur a safety rule.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    528

    Default

    The drop rule is not so much as a perfomance rule but a safety rule.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gaffney, South Carolina
    Posts
    1,057

    Default

    Ok why don't they just tech them at the scales it would be so much easier and make a lot of sense for them to tech them at the scales that way there is no confusion on where to go.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    613

    Default

    No matter how you slice it...clearly this makes the WOO look bad. It may be all Erbs fault....it’s prob a little of both.. Who knows. You don’t need NASA engineers to come up with some easy to follow method and use THAT method the SAME way..EVERY nite at EVERY race..with an official directing the winner to the tech box that’s CLEARLY marked. How hard can that be?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsand View Post
    The drop rule is not so much as a perfomance rule but a safety rule.
    No. Not at all. It has zero to do with safety.

    Every inch is worth 100# of downforce.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    4,418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Highside Hustler25 View Post
    If that's all the penalty is, might as well run illegal in qualifying, time up front and accept the penalty. If the droop hike is that much of a advantage, it's kind of a no brainer till WoO change their rules and that will be coming soon I'd imagine.
    The higher it gets the more penalty

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    @ the track
    Posts
    12,321

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsand View Post
    The drop rule is not so much as a perfomance rule but a safety rule.
    Well, that's what Ray will tell ya. Not saying either way, because I don't know the answer for sure but my confusion is why would the penalty be so minor if it is a advantage? I know Ricky Weiss is just one that says the new rule has thrown them for a loop. So it must help somewhere.

    And I'm not bringing up Erb in another thread. That horse has been bludgeoned to death.

    As far as Darrell, glad he's found some speed and is running toward the front. Bout time.
    8/13/16

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    615

    Default

    Being penalized 3 spots in group qualifying for breaking a rule, and thus going from a pole heat starting spot to an outside front row starting spot just seems lame as hell.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    544

    Default

    You fail tech in qualifying, you should be starting last in a heat. Plain and simple, but that is not the WRG and the WoO.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    679

    Default

    It's crystal clear that either A) the rockets are not affected as much by the droop rule. Or B) the rockets have put in more testing with the droop rule.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,526

    Default Jesus Christ

    Read the rule and the penalties. It is staggered. There are I believe 3 levels of penalties, obviously Lanigan was low on the infraction level, but still out of the parameters.

    Still complaining about Erb, he messed up. That’s all. It sucks, plenty of others screw up too, is what it is.
    Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No_Weak_Links View Post
    It's crystal clear that either A) the rockets are not affected as much by the droop rule. Or B) the rockets have put in more testing with the droop rule.
    I’m sure they did. Knew it was coming, so test your butt off to get dialed in with the rule.
    Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Batavia, OH
    Posts
    13,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No_Weak_Links View Post
    It's crystal clear that either A) the rockets are not affected as much by the droop rule. Or B) the rockets have put in more testing with the droop rule.
    If you believe the blue #1 is running a setup off their sheet, they were not affected.
    Modern Day Wedge Racing
    Florence -2
    Atomic - 1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.