-
Originally Posted by
manwplan
The 96V was not very good at Charlotte. Not a good initial look for BMF but I don't think they are a bad piece. There are plenty of good small builders out there but most would rather be on the chassis merry-go-round. It used to be Rocket/Masters. Now its Rocket/Longhorn.
This is not meant to be a attack on English but he's a bit of a one Trick pony and charlotte isn't anywhere in that bag. I wouldn't use charlotte as a bench mark for how he'll do in the bmf
-
Originally Posted by
Jking24
This is not meant to be a attack on English but he's a bit of a one Trick pony and charlotte isn't anywhere in that bag. I wouldn't use charlotte as a bench mark for how he'll do in the bmf
i agree tanner will be fine, i think this year should be a better year for him, he has notes for alot of these places now, plus he has the backing, so if he tests and does the homework, i can see big things happening
-
What are you talking about? In 2022 he ran WoO, finished 2nd in points had 4 wins and one of them was at the World Finals.
-
Originally Posted by
manwplan
What are you talking about? In 2022 he ran WoO, finished 2nd in points had 4 wins and one of them was at the World Finals.
Where he finished in points or how many wins he had has nothing to do with my statement
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.
Bookmarks