|
|
-
06-04-2015, 10:08 PM
#301
Originally Posted by hygty
wth??? is this then
What's what? You don't think UMP could do a better job then what they are doing. that doesn't mean other sanction bodies couldn't do better on some things as well.
Last edited by kidrock; 06-04-2015 at 10:12 PM.
-
06-04-2015, 10:17 PM
#302
yes they can all do a better job its called being human but what is IMCA big calling card
-
06-04-2015, 10:41 PM
#303
Originally Posted by kidrock
Indyboywilliam, its just not worth it they will defend UMP and high cost of racing over a better sanctioning body and lower cost for all.
this suppose be the qoute I am using a prereleased copy of windows 10
-
06-05-2015, 06:33 AM
#304
Originally Posted by hygty
yes they can all do a better job its called being human but what is IMCA big calling card
Who cares if the do or don't have a big calling card as you say. How do they run the sanction and how do they treat the drivers who buy a sanction fee is all that matters.
-
06-05-2015, 06:34 AM
#305
Originally Posted by hygty
yes they can all do a better job its called being human but what is IMCA big calling card
nows a good time to start doing better then!!!
-
06-05-2015, 06:47 AM
#306
but what is IMCA big calling card I know I know the mod winner wins 2500 bucks only to get his motor claimed wow sanction is 100 yrs old and thats all they can come up with
-
06-05-2015, 06:49 AM
#307
Originally Posted by kidrock
Who cares if the do or don't have a big calling card as you say. How do they run the sanction and how do they treat the drivers who buy a sanction fee is all that matters.
really claiming motors is treating the teams well , like i said before if they were as great as you say they are they should be only sanction around
-
06-05-2015, 07:05 AM
#308
and its all a mute point with all the rainouts we have had , a stage one mullins motor cost no difference be it UMP and IMCA but UMP doesn't claim your motor the team that won won the IMCA super nationals was running a Mullins
Last edited by hygty; 06-05-2015 at 07:51 AM.
-
06-05-2015, 09:06 AM
#309
Originally Posted by hygty
and its all a mute point with all the rainouts we have had , a stage one mullins motor cost no difference be it UMP and IMCA but UMP doesn't claim your motor the team that won won the IMCA super nationals was running a Mullins
Why do you guys want to argue with this idiot? He doesn't own or race a car. He's an old worn out idiot who sits in the stands then comes on here to try to tell those who actually own and race cars that they should spend MORE money or stay home. Quit answering when he posts his BS and he'll eventually go away. The month and a half he was banned this board was the best it's been in years. Just too bad they don't do it again permanently.
Oh, and LITE-INN, hygty, or whatever you're going by these days, no one claims in IMCA any more. It's there but not used much. They actually tech and have a standard set of rules with a hard tire, That's what makes them successful.
Stick to something you know like which track has the best hotdogs.
out where the wind ALWAYS blows!
-
06-05-2015, 02:06 PM
#310
Originally Posted by indyboywilliam
Well your the gossip QUEEN .... but you were sure WRONG ON THIS ONE ALSO.... But that's NOTHING NEW!!
A queen calling someone a queen that's funny!
I absolutely know what I am talking about!
-
06-05-2015, 04:41 PM
#311
FYI, Kyle Strickler won the big dance at the Super Nationals last year with a crate engine. Also in 2014, Chevrolet sponsored a FREE replacement crate engine to Strickler, and Karl Performance was to sponsor a FREE replacement claim engine if a claim engine would have won.
IMCA is far far from perfect, but they are a helluva lot better than UMP in regards to rules and rule enforcement.
Last edited by TS3g; 06-05-2015 at 04:43 PM.
-
06-05-2015, 05:05 PM
#312
If a crate is winning in the mods with is a b mod then exactly
-
06-05-2015, 10:16 PM
#313
Originally Posted by hygty
really claiming motors is treating the teams well , like i said before if they were as great as you say they are they should be only sanction around
again I will say I'm not for one sanction over the other. I don't know how IMCA treats their drivers but, what I said is," all that matters is how they treat them".
-
06-06-2015, 01:15 AM
#314
they are there to race not have their hands held good grief
-
06-06-2015, 10:29 AM
#315
Originally Posted by hygty
they are there to race not have their hands held good grief
Again if the racers that race under a sanction is ok with how things are ran then so be it. I have said the same thing about UMP if the racers are ok with it then so be it. They are ones putting money into this deal not you or me.
-
06-06-2015, 11:29 AM
#316
exactly so let it be good grief
-
06-06-2015, 01:43 PM
#317
Originally Posted by TS3g
FYI, Kyle Strickler won the big dance at the Super Nationals last year with a crate engine. Also in 2014, Chevrolet sponsored a FREE replacement crate engine to Strickler, and Karl Performance was to sponsor a FREE replacement claim engine if a claim engine would have won.IMCA is far far from perfect, but they are a helluva lot better than UMP in regards to rules and rule enforcement.
yep taking candy away from children Kyle normally don't run IMCA but renegades and sometimes UMP betcha he need no dose running a crate lmao
-
06-06-2015, 03:06 PM
#318
Originally Posted by hygty
exactly so let it be good grief
The problem lity there are quite a few guys that are not happy how UMP is running their sanction but, if the majority like it like I said so be it. The others will either have to deal with it or quit..
I still think if some tracks would do away with the sanction and do their own deal they would have plenty of cars follow them. A set of common rules for all tracks involved that are enforced with a decent payout and point fund and walla there you have it.
-
06-07-2015, 11:45 AM
#319
You can say that with any any sanction and enforcement is done by the track do you really expect any sanction have their own tech guys at every track or do you think everything is checked every night
-
06-07-2015, 12:52 PM
#320
I know one guy thats not happy with UMP its SCOTT BLOOMQUIST LMFAO
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.
|
|
Bookmarks