Chris Ferguson DQed

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by GEAR_HEAD View Post
    They confirmed he was legal before the race. It's 100% impossible for him to be illegal after the race unless he was tire doping, which he was not.
    What are you taking as confirmation? A phone call? The fact the tech guy didn't tell him he was illegal before the race? Just because an illegal part made it thru tech last week, year, day or hour, it isn't legal going forward.

    I'm no Kelly fan, but he seems to be getting a raw deal in the absence of public facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3 wide
    replied
    Well if you told them they were legal and now you tell them they are illegal because somebody working for you made a mistake what you should of done is just let it go and tell the person that made the mistake what he did wrong were it don't happen again

    Leave a comment:


  • GEAR_HEAD
    replied
    Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
    Any rule can be enforced before or after the race.
    They confirmed he was legal before the race. It's 100% impossible for him to be illegal after the race unless he was tire doping, which he was not.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mod Runner View Post
    Sounds like a good case of splitting hairs. Common sense would indicate the tire was not different enough from the legal
    tire to create an advantage. Sounds like the winner got the shaft and not the gold mine.
    My common sense tells me if that was an economy tire carcass, it's a pretty big advantage. We don't know the story.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by GEAR_HEAD View Post
    How can you say that? They had tire tech BEFORE THE FEATURE. He passed tire tech. That should be the end of the story. How can they say the tire was OK before the feature then DQ him afterwards because the tire tech guy "didn't know what he was looking at"?
    Any rule can be enforced before or after the race.

    Leave a comment:


  • manwplan
    replied
    This should be a full investigation by DoD but that would require them to be actual impartial journalists instead of fan boys. Plus there's so much inbreeding (Kelcar, Uiltimate, DoD, Castrol, Wild West, The Dome) no one wants to get to the bottom of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • GEAR_HEAD
    replied
    Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
    It's a "he said", "he said" and there isn't a tire in the catalog that makes sense for there to be confusion. I don't see how anyone is blameless here.

    As for everyone trying to take Fergys side, there's really no evidence to take a side.
    How can you say that? They had tire tech BEFORE THE FEATURE. He passed tire tech. That should be the end of the story. How can they say the tire was OK before the feature then DQ him afterwards because the tire tech guy "didn't know what he was looking at"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pennsboro32
    replied
    Originally posted by BloomerHarvickFan View Post
    In a situation like this, it would have been best for Fergy to have handled this via email, or at least followed up, so that there could be no denying what he was told....but, I don't guess he figured he'd get a different story later either though, seeing as how this man was supposed to be a friend, and wouldn't think you'd need a paper trail.
    I'm not picking a side but I do agree with that. It's so easy to run to facebook and let the whole world know. It's kind of embarrassing really, yet a lot of racers do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • nc mudcat
    replied
    Remember when we got both sides of the story before proclaiming guilt? Remember Duke Lacrosse? I prefer to get Ultimate's story, the pronounce the sentence if required. Chris told his, let's hear theirs.

    Leave a comment:


  • BloomerHarvickFan
    replied
    In a situation like this, it would have been best for Fergy to have handled this via email, or at least followed up, so that there could be no denying what he was told....but, I don't guess he figured he'd get a different story later either though, seeing as how this man was supposed to be a friend, and wouldn't think you'd need a paper trail.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mod Runner
    replied
    Sounds like a good case of splitting hairs. Common sense would indicate the tire was not different enough from the legal
    tire to create an advantage. Sounds like the winner got the shaft and not the gold mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by ZERO25 View Post
    For 20k with 3 witnesses, id be consulting with a lawyer!Fact!

    Someone needs to hold these series accountable!
    It's a "he said", "he said" and there isn't a tire in the catalog that makes sense for there to be confusion. I don't see how anyone is blameless here.

    As for everyone trying to take Fergys side, there's really no evidence to take a side.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZERO25
    replied
    For 20k with 3 witnesses, id be consulting with a lawyer!Fact!

    Someone needs to hold these series accountable!

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbecueboy
    replied
    I believe them both, hopefully they will get to the bottom of it and shake hands on the decision.

    Oh, and…….Tire rule, Lmao.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by ImCryn2 View Post
    Probably not failing in the big picture, but someone? sure screwed the pooch in this situation.
    I'd say everyone screwed the pooch.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X