Originally posted by cjsracing
View Post
Droop and MasterSbilt_Racer Q and A
Collapse
X
-
So back to the ugly cars of yesteryear. no thanksOriginally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View PostDroop rule gone. Decking flat in all directions. Driver side body not above decking. 3" convex bow returned to the roof. No splitter on the nose. 36" static deck height. 4" spoiler. Right side body squared off rr wheel with a fixture that runs forward and backwards from center of rr hub. No part of body can be more than 1" further away from fixture than the closest point.
That's a good start.
Leave a comment:
-
The bodies just need to be straight, flat and symmetrical with a 36†deck height. Checked with a level and a tape measure. It it fails any of the measurements, tough sh*t go fix it.
It wouldn’t even significantly change the look of the cars to the people in the stands. Would also make life way easier for the graphics guys.
Leave a comment:
-
Hence JD going right into the wall when RTJ passed him in the corner at the PittsburgherOriginally posted by Jking24 View PostThe issues have always been their per say but what's going on is the more "aero efficient " a car becomes the more it suffers from changes in the air. So when a Car has the aero efficiency of a brick it doesn't matter if the air gets disturbed because it's doing very little for the cars handling in the first place. Take a aero efficient car and disturb the air and it might lose half of its grip (handling). Hopefully that makes sense lol
Leave a comment:
-
That's the idea and the biggest problem we have, IMO.Originally posted by kidrock View PostI'm guessing this would help address the aero problem?
Leave a comment:
-
10 years ago, maybe a little longer, is when I first started seeing it affect the racing.Originally posted by SLlDlNG SIDEWAYS View PostWas there any aero issues that we're seeing today happening 10 years ago?
Leave a comment:
-
I love your ideas on the bodies MasterSbilt_Racer. I think that would be a great start.
Leave a comment:
-
The issues have always been their per say but what's going on is the more "aero efficient " a car becomes the more it suffers from changes in the air. So when a Car has the aero efficiency of a brick it doesn't matter if the air gets disturbed because it's doing very little for the cars handling in the first place. Take a aero efficient car and disturb the air and it might lose half of its grip (handling). Hopefully that makes sense lolOriginally posted by SLlDlNG SIDEWAYS View PostWas there any aero issues that we're seeing today happening 10 years ago?
Leave a comment:
-
Was there any aero issues that we're seeing today happening 10 years ago?Originally posted by kidrock View PostI'm guessing this would help address the aero problem?
Leave a comment:
-
I'm guessing this would help address the aero problem?Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View PostDroop rule gone. Decking flat in all directions. Driver side body not above decking. 3" convex bow returned to the roof. No splitter on the nose. 36" static deck height. 4" spoiler. Right side body squared off rr wheel with a fixture that runs forward and backwards from center of rr hub. No part of body can be more than 1" further away from fixture than the closest point.
That's a good start.
Leave a comment:
-
Droop rule gone. Decking flat in all directions. Driver side body not above decking. 3" convex bow returned to the roof. No splitter on the nose. 36" static deck height. 4" spoiler. Right side body squared off rr wheel with a fixture that runs forward and backwards from center of rr hub. No part of body can be more than 1" further away from fixture than the closest point.Originally posted by kidrock View PostI'm curious since you have good knowledge of the sport and chassis. What rules would you like to see changed or removed from the current set of rules?
That's a good start.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View PostThey aren't cheating. The rule is short sighted, as is the norm in our sport.
I'm curious since you have good knowledge of the sport and chassis. What rules would you like to see changed or removed from the current set of rules?
Leave a comment:
-
The rule in no way simulates one-track suspension movement and has more holes than a piece of swiss cheese. Since they made a horrible rule against droop, teams worked to get more droop. As you say, they are higher than ever.
My car would fail by 5 or 6 inches a year ago. Once I needed to pass, I had to buy a new shock and cut and weld on the frame. Didn't change a thing that affected on track droop.
Leave a comment:
-
They aren't cheating. The rule is short sighted, as is the norm in our sport.Originally posted by 84wedge View PostHow are they cheating this measurement thing, cause the cars look more jacked up than ever when they're on the gas.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: