490 cubic inch * Dirt Tracker

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by chopter33 View Post

    You keep telling yourself this
    You keep telling yourself every trinket has speed in it.

    Engine used to be the worst overspend, but they finally put enough down force on them where peddling isn't a very necessary skill.
    Last edited by MasterSbilt_Racer; 03-08-2025, 11:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopter33
    replied
    Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post

    He's not wrong. Magic axle, magic shock, magic spring, works too
    You keep telling yourself this

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterSbilt_Racer
    replied
    Originally posted by chopter33 View Post

    You keep telling yourself this.
    He's not wrong. Magic axle, magic shock, magic spring, works too

    Leave a comment:


  • chopter33
    replied
    Originally posted by Tireguy17 View Post
    So many racers, both at the local and national level, are their own worst enemies. They see more power….low friction….less rotating weight….low drag….and their wallets open.
    You keep telling yourself this.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheJet-09
    replied
    I thought Pierce liked smaller cubic inch stuff than most everyone else? Or was that just prior to changing chassis manufacturers?

    Leave a comment:


  • Top Row Analyst
    replied
    Originally posted by james777777 View Post

    Actually yes they are. Bigger is bigger.
    Yes, that is what she always says!

    Leave a comment:


  • riddle28
    replied
    Originally posted by over4T View Post
    Nothing new. We've been running a 496 for some 23 years now. Reliable as can be, torque a plenty and gets a hot 8 MPG on regular pump gas in our Chevy crew cab hauler pulling our race cars up and down the California coast.
    mcintosh ran that big block buick a few years back and did ok. Theres more economical ways to get 900 N/A

    Leave a comment:


  • over4T
    replied
    Nothing new. We've been running a 496 for some 23 years now. Reliable as can be, torque a plenty and gets a hot 8 MPG on regular pump gas in our Chevy crew cab hauler pulling our race cars up and down the California coast.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kromulous
    replied
    Originally posted by riddle28 View Post

    what is the deck height on a wide bore because thats alot of stroke whew
    Good point had to go look, its stated at 9.9" MAX so .900 taller than a SBC, thats crazy !


    Leave a comment:


  • riddle28
    replied
    Originally posted by Kromulous View Post
    A Wide bore is essentially a Big Block, the bore size is 4.180 to start or so, and can go way up to 4.250

    A BBC 454 is 4.250 bore by 4.00 stroke. The bore spacing led to the term Big Block.

    So a 480 Vic Hill is larger, 4.25 by 4.25 equals 482 cubes.

    I heard Pierce had a 500 inch Engine, but that was a rumor, unconfirmed.

    Brodix claims a 4.375 in stroke will fit, and a 4.250 max bore so that would be 496 cubes.

    I would think the ROX Block cylinder heads, they would be right at 950 to 1000 hp. Ive seen flow numbers that would support them numbers but do they run it in the car at MAX? not sure.
    what is the deck height on a wide bore because thats alot of stroke whew

    Leave a comment:


  • Kromulous
    replied
    A Wide bore is essentially a Big Block, the bore size is 4.180 to start or so, and can go way up to 4.250

    A BBC 454 is 4.250 bore by 4.00 stroke. The bore spacing led to the term Big Block.

    So a 480 Vic Hill is larger, 4.25 by 4.25 equals 482 cubes.

    I heard Pierce had a 500 inch Engine, but that was a rumor, unconfirmed.

    Brodix claims a 4.375 in stroke will fit, and a 4.250 max bore so that would be 496 cubes.

    I would think the ROX Block cylinder heads, they would be right at 950 to 1000 hp. Ive seen flow numbers that would support them numbers but do they run it in the car at MAX? not sure.
    Last edited by Kromulous; 03-07-2025, 08:48 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Henry Every
    replied
    Originally posted by Josh Bayko View Post
    There was a dude a number of years ago that built a big block aluminum late model motor that made 1100 HP. It was uncompetitive, even at Selinsgrove and Port Royal.

    Bigger motors are not necessarily better motors
    I remember that engine, built by "EDGE" I think and was run in a "Lazer" chassis. I guess you can go too far, but I find a big block interesting. Jack Pennington use to run a BB Chevy at Cherokee back in the early 90's in his Walter Newman cars, ran good too, but I'm sure it wasn't 1100 HP, that's a lot to hook up. I can only imagine the torque numbers!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • james777777
    replied
    Originally posted by Josh Bayko View Post
    There was a dude a number of years ago that built a big block aluminum late model motor that made 1100 HP. It was uncompetitive, even at Selinsgrove and Port Royal.

    Bigger motors are not necessarily bigger motors
    Actually yes they are. Bigger is bigger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Josh Bayko
    replied
    There was a dude a number of years ago that built a big block aluminum late model motor that made 1100 HP. It was uncompetitive, even at Selinsgrove and Port Royal.

    Bigger motors are not necessarily bigger motors

    Leave a comment:


  • Tireguy17
    replied
    So many racers, both at the local and national level, are their own worst enemies. They see more power….low friction….less rotating weight….low drag….and their wallets open.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X