Wisconsin Milwaukee county recount results

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CIRF
    replied
    Originally posted by mcarter815 View Post
    One person, one vote. Why should someone's vote matter more just because they choose to live in a rural area? The reason why the EC was created was to protect the less populous slave states. The Founding Fathers weren't even happy with the EC and it was a late compromise that they settled on because they were tired of arguing over it.
    Being an authentic product of urban inbreeding and the primary education system of the past 60 years it's a safe conclusion that you know little of which you speak beyond computer gaming, man-bun's, BLM and antifoofoo. Thus, it's incumbent upon all of us to give your drivel it's proper due, which is to say nothing since it's scarcely more that memorized BLM and antifoofoo talking points.

    Like I said in another post, it's people like you, who are enabling and hastening the the impending economic and cultural disaster that will inevitably lead to the extensively catastrophic and violent end to the nation and all the things that have made it a virtuous system that was the envy of everyone else on the planet. May you, and those of your ilk, suffer the most when that $hit really hits the fan.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcarter815
    replied
    Originally posted by STRONGERTHANDIRT View Post
    Then why are people leaving these great blue states in droves? Mostly because of taxes and over regulation.
    They are mostly leaving places like California because of high housing costs. There are high housing costs because so many other people want to live there.

    People moving out of California and going to Texas is turning Texas purple.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbecueboy
    replied
    Originally posted by STRONGERTHANDIRT View Post
    Then why are people leaving these great blue states in droves? Mostly because of taxes and over regulation.
    And they all claim how great it is living there......yet they still move here.

    Confusing bunch.

    Leave a comment:


  • STRONGERTHANDIRT
    replied
    Then why are people leaving these great blue states in droves? Mostly because of taxes and over regulation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbecueboy
    replied
    Originally posted by mcarter815 View Post
    Connecticut residents paid an average of $15,643 per person in federal taxes in 2015, according to a report by the Rockefeller Institute of Government. Massachusetts paid $13,582 per person, New Jersey paid $13,137 and New York paid $12,820.

    California residents paid an average of $10,510.

    At the other end, Mississippi residents paid an average of $5,740 per person, while West Virginia paid $6,349, Kentucky paid $6,626 and South Carolina paid $6,665.

    Low-tax red states also fare better when you take into account federal spending.

    Mississippi received $2.13 for every tax dollar the state sent to Washington in 2015, according to the Rockefeller study. West Virginia received $2.07, Kentucky got $1.90 and South Carolina got $1.71.

    Meanwhile, New Jersey received 74 cents in federal spending for tax every dollar the state sent to Washington. New York received 81 cents, Connecticut received 82 cents and Massachusetts received 83 cents.

    California fared a bit better than other blue states. It received 96 cents for every dollar the state sent to Washington.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican leaders have spent months promoting the myth that red low-tax states are subsidizing blue high-tax states because of the deduction for state and local taxes.



    Median household income in Democratic voting districts have gone from $54,000 in 2008 to $61,000 in 2018 compared to Republican districts going from $55,000 to $53,000. GDP per Democratic seat went from $35.7 billion to $48.5 billion compared to Republican districts going from $32.2 billion to $32.6 billion. Productivity per worker for Democratic districts went from $118,000 to $139,000 compared to Republican districts which stayed at roughly $110,000 over the decade.

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-a...iverging-fast/
    It would have been easier and more accurate to just answer fiddy truthfully.....yes, those states with the massive homeless and tent cities with the failed social policies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbecueboy
    replied
    Originally posted by mcarter815 View Post
    Those blue states make up 2/3s of the US economy. So much for making bad financial decisions.
    Yeah, that's not true......

    Leave a comment:


  • ss12
    replied
    I thought you had your own business? So it's really your dad's business and you are taking it over eventually.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZERO25
    replied
    All that means is they had poor cpa's!

    Example.....we had the same cpa for 20 plus years. One year in late Dec she said we needed to spend 50k before Jan 1. My dad why didnt you let us know back around oct or so. she had no answer and yep you guessed it....she was fired. Some are just smarter than others! We hardly paid 1% income tax on our business. We took advantage of every loophole!

    Leave a comment:


  • mcarter815
    replied
    Connecticut residents paid an average of $15,643 per person in federal taxes in 2015, according to a report by the Rockefeller Institute of Government. Massachusetts paid $13,582 per person, New Jersey paid $13,137 and New York paid $12,820.

    California residents paid an average of $10,510.

    At the other end, Mississippi residents paid an average of $5,740 per person, while West Virginia paid $6,349, Kentucky paid $6,626 and South Carolina paid $6,665.

    Low-tax red states also fare better when you take into account federal spending.

    Mississippi received $2.13 for every tax dollar the state sent to Washington in 2015, according to the Rockefeller study. West Virginia received $2.07, Kentucky got $1.90 and South Carolina got $1.71.

    Meanwhile, New Jersey received 74 cents in federal spending for tax every dollar the state sent to Washington. New York received 81 cents, Connecticut received 82 cents and Massachusetts received 83 cents.

    California fared a bit better than other blue states. It received 96 cents for every dollar the state sent to Washington.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican leaders have spent months promoting the myth that red low-tax states are subsidizing blue high-tax states because of the deduction for state and local taxes.



    Median household income in Democratic voting districts have gone from $54,000 in 2008 to $61,000 in 2018 compared to Republican districts going from $55,000 to $53,000. GDP per Democratic seat went from $35.7 billion to $48.5 billion compared to Republican districts going from $32.2 billion to $32.6 billion. Productivity per worker for Democratic districts went from $118,000 to $139,000 compared to Republican districts which stayed at roughly $110,000 over the decade.

    Leave a comment:


  • 50j
    replied
    Simply look up "states most likely to default" or something similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • 50j
    replied
    Originally posted by mcarter815 View Post
    Those blue states make up 2/3s of the US economy. So much for making bad financial decisions.
    You mean the ones whose tax revenue can't support their social programs? The ones with massive homeless populations? Tent cities?
    Last edited by 50j; 12-02-2020, 09:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZERO25
    replied
    Originally posted by Barbecueboy View Post
    The fact you even need to explain that to him says a lot about the depth of the water in the well, if you know what I mean?

    Reminds me of my redneck uncle.....if we were driving through the woods and came up on a water hole hole he had 2 expressions. One, if it was deep, he would say....peter deep to a giraffe or two, if it was shallow.....not enough to drown a piss ant!

    I believe the latter fits Mcnugget!

    Leave a comment:


  • mcarter815
    replied
    Originally posted by 50j View Post
    People vote but people who have something gained by generations of hard work vote differently than illegal immigrants, drug users, vandals, deviants and those who make bad financial decisions. All you have to do is look at the blue states to see why they shouldn't dictate policy.
    Those blue states make up 2/3s of the US economy. So much for making bad financial decisions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbecueboy
    replied
    Again, the fact it even needs to be explained.......

    Well said 50

    Leave a comment:


  • 50j
    replied
    People vote but people who have something gained by generations of hard work vote differently than illegal immigrants, drug users, vandals, deviants and those who make bad financial decisions. All you have to do is look at the blue states to see why they shouldn't dictate policy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X