Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: LR spring angle

  1. #1

    Default LR spring angle

    I see most all the 4 bar cars the LR spring looks mounted with it leaned towards the rear of car. Is the spring mounted this way to keep the coil over and birdcage from binding during travel or is there another reason.
    How much angle seems to be the normal?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    colchester il.
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    yes for the most part it's at that angle to keep the shock heims from binding.some chassis builders have the spring standing straight up at ride ht but as the lr travels down and forward it pulls the lower shock in the same arch.I've seen them at 7 degree at ride ht also so it's just what the chassis builder fills works best.here's few photos in the first one the lr is at full drop and you can see the heims joints they have plunty of room to pivot more if needed.

  3. #3

    Default

    Thanks racin6mod!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    146

    Default



    20 degree layback on this chassis..............

  5. #5

    Default

    why so much angle back?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    colchester il.
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    is that 20 degrees at full drop or at ride ht.?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lock Haven, Pa
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Looks like ride height to me..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Dogwood Illinois
    Posts
    701

    Default

    The further back the spring atachs to the chassis the more control a softer spring will have . Dont forget that more angle naturaly decreases a springs rate of control. Mountings must be placed in an arc so hike is not deminished. 6 of one , half dozen of another. Clearance is the main focus .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    in the fast lane
    Posts
    390

    Cool

    Thats one of these racecars.http://www.evolutionmotorsports.net/home.html
    BUSTING OURS TO KICK YOURS

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    911

    Default

    Never seen one of those cars go good around here. They do well in some parts but that spring layback is very excessive. You're throwing the slider into a bind as well as needing a STIFFER spring.
    Curious that we spend more time congratulating people who have succeeded than encouraging people who have not.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Barrington il.
    Posts
    881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stock car driver View Post
    I bet someone was just looking at that angle the mount above the lower looks more realistic a little in front and would work well..

    I really like that rear design, I went to their site and their lack of a halo over the driver wouldnt work for me. the bar is above the drivers head not around it.
    Yeah, when you are 6 foot 4 inches tall it becomes a real issue!!! :-)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    146

    Default

    we have a 2011 evolution car for sale if anyone is interested, its got about 10 races on it.

    http://www.evolutionmotorsports.net/mikejarvis11.html

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Dogwood Illinois
    Posts
    701

    Cool

    I like seeing tubes bent a little out of the ordinary , Looks like someones doing some thinking rather than just copying something that already exists . That design should isolate damage , good idea .

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TeamGRT12x View Post
    Never seen one of those cars go good around here. They do well in some parts but that spring layback is very excessive. You're throwing the slider into a bind as well as needing a STIFFER spring.
    2010 + Hughes Chassis look to have similar layback and work really well. (175 Spring)

    I don't see how it will bind as much as it will limit hike, correct me if I'm wrong. (not an attack on you, just learning)

    I dig the tail design.... Way to think outside the box !!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tulsa america
    Posts
    2,687

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JHobbs26 View Post
    we have a 2011 evolution car for sale if anyone is interested, its got about 10 races on it.

    http://www.evolutionmotorsports.net/mikejarvis11.html
    how much is he asking?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    tulsa america
    Posts
    2,687

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TeamGRT12x View Post
    Never seen one of those cars go good around here. They do well in some parts but that spring layback is very excessive. You're throwing the slider into a bind as well as needing a STIFFER spring.
    I cant see how it would bind as long as the mounts are lined up and you run it through the motions. could just as easily bind one up with it slightly layed in and straight up and down.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by powerslide View Post
    how much is he asking?
    Was wanting $4000 for chassis/body, tear drop fuel cell, 2 sets of evo upper a arms, and evo birdcages. Basically everything they got that is unique to this car.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1Blacksheep View Post
    I like seeing tubes bent a little out of the ordinary , Looks like someones doing some thinking rather than just copying something that already exists . That design should isolate damage , good idea .
    This car i posted pictures of got backed into the wall at Humboldt, KS and it did exactly that, it folded over behind the suspension points. We ordered new tubing from Andy, welded it all back up and is as good as new.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    911

    Default

    Kojak... Not to rain on your parade but the 2010 and up Hughes cars don't have near that much lay back in the left rear spring.

    Any time you lay a coil over eliminator at an angle you have more of a chance at bind that you would straight up and down. Not saying that this setup binds, but you've got a lot better chance at adding some drag to the slider with that much angle. IMO too much angle.
    Last edited by TeamGRT12x; 01-09-2012 at 05:48 PM.
    Curious that we spend more time congratulating people who have succeeded than encouraging people who have not.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    179

    Default

    [QUOTE=TeamGRT12x;1480070]Kojak... Not to rain on your parade but the 2010 and up Hughes cars don't have near that much lay back in the left rear spring.

    No parade here. I said "look to have".

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.