Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Pulled the front springs. The RF was a 625 and has some age on it. This could explain the shock body having a dent in it from the spring compressing too far. The LF had a 700. I put the 700 in the RF and a 800 i had in the LF. These are the heaviest front springs i have for now. RE-set the ride heights. If I'm still having trouble i could swap front springs or go just heavier on the RF ? I also raised the RR trailing arm up to 11 degrees. Thanks for every ones help so far.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Glasgow, Kentucky
    Posts
    4,852

    Default

    Remember a tire can only do X amount of work, forward or sideways the max traction it can generate will be X.
    When you let off of the gas or hit the brakes the chassis weight still tries to move forward loading the front tires. The heavier spring will get most of that load. IF that spring is on the LF it will increase drag on that corner and increase traction to a point. IF that tire is the RF tire that tire will increase drag on that corner. The corner that has more drag will cause the car to want to turn toward tat direction.
    The RF tire is used more in turining into the corner than the LF AND the cars side loading during cornering and weight transfer form cornering increase the work load on that tire. IF it is also catching the weight from the deceleration it can EASLY put that tire beyond X which will shear the contact patch and cause the car to go straight.
    To get the car to turn into the corner better adding LF spring rate increases load on the LF csusion the car to want to turn into the corner and then it carries more weight allowing the RF to turn the car better. This also compresses the RF with will allow the LR to stay raised more which helps promote forward bite from center off without a radical chassis attitude change.
    Watch the late models as I know VERY VERY few people that run a RF spring that is stiffer than the LF and I have seen a 450-550 LF and a 250-275 RF.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,016

    Default

    It also really depends again on if you are entering on or off the throttle. You will see bigger reverse splits in the DLM world if the driver is hammer down getting into entry...If he is off the throttle and rolls it in you will see less split...We really had issues with the car not turning when he was off throttle rolling in and when Skip Arp told us to change the front springs, bingo, it worked...We ended up with a 450 LF and a 400 RF, car would turn anywhere he needed it to...Now we run a 500/400 split and a 500/375 on dry flat stuff...just an idea..

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    490

    Default

    Badfast47.....

    I really respect Ego and SJ Valley and think they are giving you some good food for thought.

    That being said, you need to remember you have a metric stub mod and not a late model. We ran springs closer to what they are talking about when we ran LM but you need to do some math.

    There is a ratio of the spring location compared to the a-frame length between pivot points. A LM runs a coilover that is acting within 2" of the ball joint location. You are running a spring that is several times that distance from the ball joint. That distance creates a ratio, thus the heavier springs you need to get the same "feel" a LM would with it's lighter springs. A Chevelle stub has a different spring ratio than your metric or a car like ours with a metric Impala stub. In our case, I am generally rated at least 50# heavier than a Chevelle stub car when it comes to springs. It has to do with the spring location in the lower a-frame.

    In addition to that, you are probably running a smaller and harder tire than most LM cars. Your car is probably heavier than most LM. Less side bite and forward bite is available to you than a LM has. This all has an effect on your spring choice also.

    I am currently working with 2 different drivers in out 2 cars. Both want different things from the cars. One wants RF heavy spring and the other wants LF heavy spring. Both seem to do fine. One trail brakes, the other drives in. They take totally different setups. See what works for you.

    Be careful when people recommend a spring, they may be on a different stub, tire or different program entierly than you are. The theory may be applicable, but not the rates they suggest.

    Try the 700RF/800LF, you own it. Be sure your shocks are good, get them dynoed. Get your springs rated so you know exactly what you have. You said you have signs of it bottoming out. Fix that problem. You will chase your tail until your car runs on the proper springs and not the frame.

    JMO,
    SPark
    Last edited by LM14; 04-18-2012 at 10:35 PM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,016

    Default

    I totally agree with LM14 in that our old Super Stock with a Camaro clip and fabbed frame is closer to what you are doing..We only ran a reverse split on a couple of unique type tracks...just don't be scared of trying different set ups until you hit it and at that point who cares what the numbers are!!make it work for you as the leverage points are totally different compared to what we do with the DLM..

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    I think he is running nova lowers which could take a different spring than metrics, more in the chevelle range or a little heavier. Good luck in your choice.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    I am on the nova lowers so i hope i went the right direction with the springs, sounds like i have. I should be on the track saturday night to see what happens, I will post it on here the next day. I have got a lot of good help on here and feeling good about it. Theres a lot of competition in the modified class and i want to be right in there with the rest of them. Thanks EVERY ONE.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I'm on 4/4 and mine will not turn in either. Have tried everything under the sun except remove my 90/10 completely. finally realized it was holding it up on the bars entering (off gas) thus making it tight. Are u running a 90/10

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    No i am using a 70/10. haven't been able to test the front springs because of the weather.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,893

    Default metric

    If you are on nova lower a's you need to be around a 750 lf and a 700 RF depending on tire, and shock package.
    remember when you change a spring say 100 lbs on a nova lower, figure the 30% motion ratio, you are actually changing a spring rate by 30 lbs. 1/2 that for a 50lb spring change.
    I ran the 750 lf 700rf on a ump tire.
    If you are on kk704's or a IMCA tire, you may need to soften up a bit due to sidewall flex, and hardness of tire.
    If you are on American Racer, say a TSMA, or open tires, you may need to stiffen a bit due to softness of sidewall and tread compound.
    Also the shock compression and rebound need to be accounted for as well for spring choice.

    If you have a go-pro or some sort of camera to watch the RF suspension you will gain a wealth of knowledge what the car is doing on corner entry, and through middle, and off corner.

    JAD
    I think there should be lifeguards in the genepool.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    139

    Cool It turns going in !

    The springs made a big difference, (wow) !!! It's turning just like i want now. The only two other things i did as i said before was put the spring pull bar back in and raised the RR trailing arm. The middle of the turn and coming off is better but feels Like i need to plant the RR a little more. Thinking of taking out the shorty bar and putting in the j bar, as suggested before and /or putting in a stiffer RR spring?? Plus a stiffer rebound shock on the RR ? Which one of should be my first move? Thanks. I'm headed in the right direction.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.