Originally posted by 3 wide
View Post
Banned ??????
Collapse
X
-
You need to have systems in place to be 100% certain that someone is actually cheating before you can enforce anything.....Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
-
Bboy To most that dont matter.. If they dont like that driver they will Wine .. if the Love the driver they will Wine .. But too fix it .. That be too easy .. Know what I mean....You are not a Cheater till you PROVE that they Cheated ..I am sorry butThey have not Proved that ...Originally posted by Barbecueboy View PostYou need to have systems in place to be 100% certain that someone is actually cheating before you can enforce anything.....
Comment
-
and what would that be when they track scales prevail and you come up light you are done , when they find tires that does not meet the benchmark what more do you wantOriginally posted by Barbecueboy View PostYou need to have systems in place to be 100% certain that someone is actually cheating before you can enforce anything.....
Comment
-
Some seem to want to get away from the facts here. The rules say a tire has to meet the benchmark of the manufacture, it says nothing about added chemicals, although that would not meet the benchmark. The 5 drivers agreed to this when entering. So hypothetically you could add a solvent that would evaporate, taking some part of the tires make up with it. The tire then, would not meet the benchmark and be illegal. If you where sold a special tire from the dealer, I doubt that neither party would be ignorant of the fact, that it would not meet the benchmark.It seems a driver should be more discerning about who he buys tires from. No matter how you put it, it was he driver that has to insure that the tire meets the bench mark. If he was sold a illegal tire unknowingly, they should be suing that guy and they shouldn't be buying tires from them again. Do you really want a tire deal from someone that is going to get you banned and labeled a cheater?
Bottom line is, these guys had tires that didn't meet the bench mark, unless they can prove the samples where tampered with or the benchmark was incorrect or the Lab didn't do a good job, How can they win? I don't think these guys thought this threw very well. Just because one of these Lawyers say something, it doesn't make it true. They have to have proof in a court of law or overwhelming doubt. It's a good bet, the defendants sent some of their sample to another lab for a back up expert witness. It they match, it's a slam dunk, if it don't they will discard it. The plaintiffs can send out a sample of that tire, but the chain of custody is slightly tainted and they better hope it matches the benchmark 100% or it may be worthless. If it matches, it does create doubt.
Comment
-
Jerry Bowersock said last night the owner of the best performance team said F eldora, he wasn't supporting them. Jeff Babc0cok could run the world if he wanted to in the best car. No one is banned.
Jerry is sponsored by best, if anyone would know the truth, it would be him.
Comment
-
Many of you forget UMP's long-time dislike of Scott. I was on pit road during that lap 19 caution, circa Eldora 2014. When they put him to the rear, that big-lumbering UMP official and the scrawny mustache official started high-fiving and laughing ecstatically....
Comment
-
So they tested the tires,found them to be bad,tested them again and was ok?Originally posted by Cardirt0 View PostBboy To most that dont matter.. If they dont like that driver they will Wine .. if the Love the driver they will Wine .. But too fix it .. That be too easy .. Know what I mean....You are not a Cheater till you PROVE that they Cheated ..I am sorry butThey have not Proved that ...
What should they do?.............just let it slide
Comment
-
That would make too much sense.......and who needs to be certain anyway?Originally posted by K1ngCat View PostThey need to roll them tires out to the middle of the infield like they did at the North South 100,every single time,test them,test them,test them,then we may find out if it's the tires or the drivers.
Let's just all trust everything and use the honor system from top to bottom on both sides......that would be fair, right?Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
I think its funny some on here are such haters, that they wouldn't sue someone over a measly 100k. I guess only some of us with good sense would do so.....roll eyes!Originally posted by Barbecueboy View PostThat would make too much sense.......and who needs to be certain anyway?
Let's just all trust everything and use the honor system from top to bottom on both sides......that would be fair, right?
If I was a betting man, I bet the fab 5's lawyer took the case on contingency! Generally, high profile lawyers only take those when its a slam dunk!Turn LEFT, Vote RIGHT!
Comment
-
I would like to be 100 percent certain when I call Bloompest a cheater,even though his history has proven that to be fact.Originally posted by Barbecueboy View PostThat would make too much sense.......and who needs to be certain anyway?
Let's just all trust everything and use the honor system from top to bottom on both sides......that would be fair, right?
Comment
-
better check their lawyers profile againOriginally posted by a25rjr View PostI think its funny some on here are such haters, that they wouldn't sue someone over a measly 100k. I guess only some of us with good sense would do so.....roll eyes!If I was a betting man, I bet the fab 5's lawyer took the case on contingency! Generally, high profile lawyers only take those when its a slam dunk!
Comment
Comment