Flipping cars & injuries

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zeroracing
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 1014

    #31
    Well,
    1. External fuel shut off is a good idea
    2. We used to have it then some body mandated it's now in reach of the driver. Tracks we used to run at always said right behind the seat, where track could reach it now it's in drivers reach. Which me as RF of (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)pit most the time.
    3. Just cut them off, a simple set of shears would work as fast as mangled fasteners.
    4. I hate when the rule book sets up the race car. Hate it, and we do have a limiter its roll steer becomes too much.

    I do agree on the top two and see where your going on the third but would feel it would come off accidentally more than people would want or come off early in a flip and let the roof halo dig in.

    Comment

    • Cardirt0
      Banned
      • May 2007
      • 5271

      #32
      Originally posted by zeroracing View Post
      Well,
      1. External fuel shut off is a good idea
      2. We used to have it then some body mandated it's now in reach of the driver. Tracks we used to run at always said right behind the seat, where track could reach it now it's in drivers reach. Which me as RF of (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)pit most the time.
      3. Just cut them off, a simple set of shears would work as fast as mangled fasteners.
      4. I hate when the rule book sets up the race car. Hate it, and we do have a limiter its roll steer becomes too much.

      I do agree on the top two and see where your going on the third but would feel it would come off accidentally more than people would want or come off early in a flip and let the roof halo dig in.
      The last topless race i went to, I was thinking this is going too get some one killed.. Flip land on the berm 100 pounds of dirt entering the car at 60 MPH...Cause there no roof on the car..Not good...The roof need to be hard (Bolted) on the car...

      Comment

      • Bubstr
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 3734

        #33
        Originally posted by zeroracing View Post
        Well,
        1. External fuel shut off is a good idea
        2. We used to have it then some body mandated it's now in reach of the driver. Tracks we used to run at always said right behind the seat, where track could reach it now it's in drivers reach. Which me as RF of (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)pit most the time.
        3. Just cut them off, a simple set of shears would work as fast as mangled fasteners.
        4. I hate when the rule book sets up the race car. Hate it, and we do have a limiter its roll steer becomes too much.

        I do agree on the top two and see where your going on the third but would feel it would come off accidentally more than people would want or come off early in a flip and let the roof halo dig in.
        1 put 2 shut offs on them if you want, just make one in the same spot where track personal can operate it.
        2 quick fasteners have been used on Jet airplanes that fly 1500 mph and the panels don't fall off. Midgets and Sprint cars attach almost all of their panels with them. And like I say, it's not mandatory. If you want a fast exit sometime, you will do it. It should just be standard thing. .
        3 the roll steer is not working. I don't like mandating set ups either, but if they can limit how many shocks you have on the left rear because someone is too fast to catch and too hard to figure out, a chain to save lives seems like a bargain. If you know race cars, you know high weight and the J bar angle is what makes them tumble so easy now days.

        The last time I saw the need for sheers, they found one 1/2hour later in the pits. their not cheap, but a very good idea to have on hand. That Driver was mad about sitting that long with a broken neck. If he was on fire, I don't suppose he would still be angry.

        I'm not arguing these things. I believe they are some of the best ideas to save lives and still not hamper the racing or cost a fortune. Think about these ideas before you nix them. Are there better ideas?

        Comment

        • Stede Bonnet
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2016
          • 325

          #34
          It all adds up to a bad vehicular "Attitude".

          Originally posted by Bubstr View Post
          I have to disagree with Areo being the culprit that rolls cars over. It keeps them down. What rolls them over is higher centers of gravity, from LR hike and over all raising weight for better weight transfer for forward and side bite. Is it easier to push a refrigerator over by pushing at the bottom or top? Your center of gravity is where forces push. If you raise that point, the car will tumble easier. Fairly simple. Remember the old flat running cars? They slid a lot more. Now that they get up in the air, they get more than their wish for side bite at times. There is your problem. How do you fix it, when everyone runs on the edge.?
          Originally posted by Cardirt0 View Post
          And that Refrigerator is now a 1/3 of the way flipped when they on the gas..some cars are 1 foot or more higher on the drivers side now...Nose digs in tire digs in you gone...Its not Areo...
          Originally posted by Josh Bayko View Post
          Modern setups are the way way they are because of the aerodynamics a late model brings. If you took away some of that aero, the setups would go away, because the cars would be tighter than bull's a*shole.
          Originally posted by billetbirdcage View Post
          NO!


          Too me what has changed most is the speed into the corner, thus more likely to flip on some tracks with character.

          Name one person that has flipped that wasn't on entry to the middle of the corner?
          I think we're all talking about the same thing just arguing over the path that got us here. It all started back when the shock behind was introduced. Shock behind gave great traction but handful to drive. After that the setups kept evolving to calm the cars back down and make it more driveable. The way to make them drivable was softening the RF, but once you get soft enough so the car isn't pulling wheelies you lose your drive and the frame hits the track. To fix that you use bumps and other sophisticated suspension items pinning the RF and keeping the nose down. The end product is a car with great traction and high corner speed, but a really horrible attitude for safety.

          I agree with "flagone" the aero has gotten crazy and needs reigning in to help reduce corner speeds, but that's only one part of the evolved setup/attitude issue. I think getting the cars back to a mid 90's attitude would be safer and less costly to run. You could start by enforcing the old body rules that said the bottom edge of the nose could be no higher than 6 inches from ground. This would take away a lot of the suspension travel on RF. Then do like he said and get the cars back to having equal doors, no splitters, flat flippers, etc. The best way to make things happen isn't mandating everyone throw away their stuff, but increase the minimum weight on the cars running exotic and lower the weight on a car that incorporates all the changes. Soon racers will change on their own to get the weight advantage. This is how Havatampa got everyone to get ride of the slope nose and run the stock appearing STARS type noses, a weight break. Just my thoughts.
          Politically Incorrect.

          Comment

          • BloomerHarvickFan
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2007
            • 546

            #35
            I think they got a 50 lb weigh break for stock noses. That's when Bloomquist was running the Ford Probe nose.
            I also seem to remember the Ford engines getting a weight break too.

            Comment

            • Cardirt0
              Banned
              • May 2007
              • 5271

              #36
              You Know what the say .. When someone DIES they will make Changes...It seams like someone has too get killed for them too do something...

              Comment

              • BloomerHarvickFan
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2007
                • 546

                #37
                Originally posted by Cardirt0 View Post
                You Know what the say .. When someone DIES they will make Changes...It seams like someone has too get killed for them too do something...
                That's what's been running through my head reading this thread. And not just anybody. Until a "big" name gets seriously injured or dies, it will never change. Just like Nascar. Earnhardt wasn't the first driver killed, just the most important.

                Comment

                • Cardirt0
                  Banned
                  • May 2007
                  • 5271

                  #38
                  Originally posted by BloomerHarvickFan View Post
                  That's what's been running through my head reading this thread. And not just anybody. Until a "big" name gets seriously injured or dies, it will never change. Just like Nascar. Earnhardt wasn't the first driver killed, just the most important.
                  And thats sad... The Kings Grandson die they looked at and did a few things...Dale died and the Roof Craved in...I bet Dale E would be Happy too know his death may have saved more then 1 person..

                  Comment

                  • BloomerHarvickFan
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 546

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Cardirt0 View Post
                    And thats sad... The Kings Grandson die they looked at and did a few things...Dale died and the Roof Craved in...I bet Dale E would be Happy too know his death may have saved more then 1 person..
                    Possibly his own son's life. I mean look at his concussions, and that's with all the newer safety equipment. Imagine if it hadn't been implemented.

                    Comment

                    • Cardirt0
                      Banned
                      • May 2007
                      • 5271

                      #40
                      Originally posted by BloomerHarvickFan View Post
                      Possibly his own son's life. I mean look at his concussions, and that's with all the newer safety equipment. Imagine if it hadn't been implemented.
                      I think he may have been kill on that one hit...dale jr.. His boy may have too stop racing , BUT may be a round too have Kids...And not Dead thanks too HIM...You are so right....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X