DLM nose pieces

[Clayton_Wetter]

If we wanted your opinion we would've asked for it.

Yeah Perverton, you get to bed early tonight and quit bothering us grownups!!!

[MBR Performance]

The people on here that say leave it alone are the ones not footing the bill.

[zyoung25]

I've liked all generations of late models myself, even the new. However, I do like Mr.Rulhmans ideas. It's simple and sensible.

[calverton]

If we wanted your opinion we would've asked for it.

who made you gawd

[MI Dirt Fan]

who made you gawd

What??????

[MasterSbilt_Racer]

It appears to me, a 5 or 6 inch valence height would greatly help also. Make it standard mounting and standard bumpers.

Keep the bodies the same. They were originally called "outlaw" for a reason. Go watch Nascrap if you want stock appearing!

Probably just make the cars more brutal on a rough track when you have less travel to work with to get the nose back on the ground.

[Highside Hustler25]

The people on here that say leave it alone are the ones not footing the bill.

They're all opinions Knucklehead. Don't take it to seriously

[dangerdann]

I personally like the gen1 and gen 2 md3 with closed rear sail panels. Im not a fan of the new noses. I also think (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)pits have gotten alittle outta hand with aero

[jog49]

Pay no attention to Ruhlman's comments. They make too much sense to fly!

[ptown]

IMO the best looking era of late models, not sure exactly the year mid 90s?

[cutman]

I agree ptown. Flat nose, flat deck- double thumbs up

[billetbirdcage]

Lucas oil, had at least discussed trimming or eliminating rear spoilers and some sort of front valance elimination or hieght requirement for the 2017 season. However it seems dead for 2017 as all the attention right now is on the rear end weights which like I said will be released any time now, because teams are being told the rule it's just not in print yet. They flip-flopped on what they were/are going to do and as usual, the rule that will actually stop what they are wanting/trying to stop was not chosen and they did a stupid way of limiting it that costs more money and really don't totally stop it at all.

I have such a headache from beating my head on the desk it's not funny, who would have thought they got this rule wrong too, least as far as how they wrote it (least what is being told the the racers going to speedweeks) and just made it hard to tech when there is a real simple way to do it that they were going to do but passed for whatever reason.

[cutman]

Lucas oil, had at least discussed trimming or eliminating rear spoilers and some sort of front valance elimination or hieght requirement for the 2017 season. However it seems dead for 2017 as all the attention right now is on the rear end weights which like I said will be released any time now, because teams are being told the rule it's just not in print yet. They flip-flopped on what they were/are going to do and as usual, the rule that will actually stop what they are wanting/trying to stop was not chosen and they did a stupid way of limiting it that costs more money and really don't totally stop it at all.

I have such a headache from beating my head on the desk it's not funny, who would have thought they got this rule wrong too, least as far as how they wrote it (least what is being told the the racers going to speedweeks) and just made it hard to tech when there is a real simple way to do it that they were going to do but passed for whatever reason.

You mean the photographing series director didn't get it right? I'm shocked

[ptown]

You mean the photographing series director didn't get it right? I'm shocked

I always wondered how that qualified him for that job, maybe he knew somebody.

[Krooser]

I'd say Mr Ruhlman has a good handle on this subject... Maybe I'll reuse the old Mustang nose that came on my car