Shorter Races

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kwd1253
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2014
    • 2262

    #16
    Most fans are not going pay $25-40 for a 25 lap race, I wouldn't that for sure. If drivers don't want race 40-50 laps for 5-10k race. Hang it up or go to track pays $500-1000 for 25 laps. Reason tracks don't have 5-10k race every weekend because fans not going pay $25-40 every weekend. Local sponsors that put money up in to help the purse not going do that, specially not for 25 laps.

    I noticed alot of drivers that trying get in sat night at farm city didn't Sunday race.

    Comment

    • ptown
      Banned
      • Jan 2011
      • 1906

      #17
      Originally posted by Shiny Side Up 18 View Post
      This might be a stupid idea, but how about for the Summer Nationals we have twin 25s? Run the first 25 lapper, then invert the field for the second 25 lapper. Run Modifieds between the 25s. $1000 bonus if someone wins both.

      Yea NASCAR sucks.

      Comment

      • Kwd1253
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2014
        • 2262

        #18
        Originally posted by ptown View Post
        Yea NASCAR sucks.
        25 lap Nascar might be good idea this days. They would have to race then by lap 18 half field would be wrecked out.

        Comment

        • MI Dirt Fan
          Banned
          • May 2007
          • 8806

          #19
          Originally posted by Kwd1253 View Post
          25 lap Nascar might be good idea this days. They would have to race then by lap 18 half field would be wrecked out.
          Carl Edwards isn't racing anymore.

          Comment

          • MasterSbilt_Racer
            Senior Member
            • May 2007
            • 14303

            #20
            Originally posted by ClampedUp View Post
            Clearly spoken by someone that isn't footing the engine, engine rebuild, and tire bills.
            Lets see do I want to race 40 laps or 100 laps for that $20k if I win or $1k if I finish last......
            Also in my opinion 2 day shows with the exception of a few of the original "crown jewels"(I hate that moniker!) or are two separate paying shows are nothing but a fan and driver gouging rip off.
            You are making a different argument. It was proposed that the racing was better. You start the race with 4 tires on your car either way. But the other items have merit as far as teams' expenses go. But, you are assuming pay doesn't drop with laps.

            But there again, I been in this sport 30 years and expenses always get argued at the wrong times. They watch blindly was cars become down force monstrosities and install wide bore engines. Then they cry cause Davenport wins with some junk hacked out in the shop.
            Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

            Comment

            • chupp n bloomer fan
              Senior Member
              • May 2007
              • 11526

              #21
              Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
              You are making a different argument. It was proposed that the racing was better. You start the race with 4 tires on your car either way. But the other items have merit as far as teams' expenses go. But, you are assuming pay doesn't drop with laps.

              But there again, I been in this sport 30 years and expenses always get argued at the wrong times. They watch blindly was cars become down force monstrosities and install wide bore engines. Then they cry cause Davenport wins with some junk hacked out in the shop.
              That junk hacked out in the shop made a night and day difference in his speed. It shoulda been axed as it was. Two years ago now. That anyone can admit took a lot of testing and I'm sure r&d on a computer to get it correct. The end product may not have been pricey, but getting there I'm sure was.

              But you are also right in that the bodies and aero crap is getting ridiculous. They need to nip that sh!t in the butt, not let them get farther and farther into la la land as they are. The engines, I dunno, let the guys deplete their inventory, and the manufacturers, and then put them back to what they used to run.

              And I wouldn't shorten the races, up the purses, and work on track prep. Purses haven't changed, and track prep is very inconsistent.
              Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

              Comment

              • MasterSbilt_Racer
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 14303

                #22
                So many assumptions. Just like the people who make rules based on less than facts.
                Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

                Comment

                • dirtyboy
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2007
                  • 1885

                  #23
                  As long as they drop the admission prices, then drop the amount of laps they run.

                  Comment

                  • chupp n bloomer fan
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2007
                    • 11526

                    #24
                    Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
                    So many assumptions. Just like the people who make rules based on less than facts.
                    Then you start your own little series since you got all the answers. I agreed with you for the most part, but the downplaying of Rumley and his gadget as junk made in the shop is ridiculous. I mean, it's been two years, over and done with. Move on. That minuscule hacked up device made JD go from a top 10 car, to a dominant kick their a$$ car. So go ahead and keep downplaying, results show just how important it was.
                    Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

                    Comment

                    • MasterSbilt_Racer
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2007
                      • 14303

                      #25
                      Originally posted by chupp n bloomer fan View Post
                      Then you start your own little series since you got all the answers. I agreed with you for the most part, but the downplaying of Rumley and his gadget as junk made in the shop is ridiculous. I mean, it's been two years, over and done with. Move on. That minuscule hacked up device made JD go from a top 10 car, to a dominant kick their a$$ car. So go ahead and keep downplaying, results show just how important it was.
                      Results don't mean something was cost prohibitive. If the truth is that it will take 6 months for CBR to catch up, just call a spade a spade. Don't cry costs. That was the point.
                      Last edited by MasterSbilt_Racer; 04-09-2017, 01:26 PM.
                      Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

                      Comment

                      • Bubstr
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 3734

                        #26
                        Originally posted by chupp n bloomer fan View Post
                        Then you start your own little series since you got all the answers. I agreed with you for the most part, but the downplaying of Rumley and his gadget as junk made in the shop is ridiculous. I mean, it's been two years, over and done with. Move on. That minuscule hacked up device made JD go from a top 10 car, to a dominant kick their a$$ car. So go ahead and keep downplaying, results show just how important it was.
                        Something like the Rumley device should never be over and done with. If anyone can explain how and why it works, they may have a legitimate reason for banning it. The sanctioning bodies didn't or couldn't explain it, so we must assume that they assumed it was expensive to R&D. They made a rule aimed at one team, much like the, being late rule, was against Bloomquist. If that device belonged to a Manufacturer and for sale to anyone, it wouldn't be banned right now. They don't ban a new nose every year or more HP to make use of that nose. For all anyone knows, Rumley could have dreamed that up one night and made it out of scrap junk. The advantage it had would have been short lived. The other teams have taken what they could from it and are using it. So many people are afraid of the unknown. Fact is, you don't know, what you don't know, why fear it. Davenport wasn't going to beat everyone with this device for long. They earned that advantage and should have been able to ride the advantage, just like spring behind or gas shocks. They took something away from the whole racing community when they made this rule. They took innovation. If smart goes fast, they made everyone that races dirt a little slower with this rule.

                        Comment

                        • MasterSbilt_Racer
                          Senior Member
                          • May 2007
                          • 14303

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Bubstr View Post
                          Something like the Rumley device should never be over and done with. If anyone can explain how and why it works, they may have a legitimate reason for banning it. The sanctioning bodies didn't or couldn't explain it, so we must assume that they assumed it was expensive to R&D. They made a rule aimed at one team, much like the, being late rule, was against Bloomquist. If that device belonged to a Manufacturer and for sale to anyone, it wouldn't be banned right now. They don't ban a new nose every year or more HP to make use of that nose. For all anyone knows, Rumley could have dreamed that up one night and made it out of scrap junk. The advantage it had would have been short lived. The other teams have taken what they could from it and are using it. So many people are afraid of the unknown. Fact is, you don't know, what you don't know, why fear it. Davenport wasn't going to beat everyone with this device for long. They earned that advantage and should have been able to ride the advantage, just like spring behind or gas shocks. They took something away from the whole racing community when they made this rule. They took innovation. If smart goes fast, they made everyone that races dirt a little slower with this rule.
                          You hit the nail on the head! It is "cheaper" to buy an XR1 and get all the info you need to make that big stack of bumpstops work. Lol
                          Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

                          Comment

                          • DirtPhantom
                            Junior Member
                            • Dec 2012
                            • 24

                            #28
                            To comment to the OP, yes A-Main laps should be reduced for regular events, but only for tracks over 3/8th mile from 50 to 40 laps, keep the 3/8th mile tracks and smaller A-Mains at 50 laps, plus every regular scheduled A-Main should start 26 cars and pay at least $15k to win $1,500 to start. For the 2nd poster, both the LOLMDS & WOO should each have at least four 100 lap A-Main races scheduled each year paying at least $50k to win and starting 28 cars. I will go further, both series need to co-sanction four 100 lap $100k to win crown jewel events each year in addition to the four 100 lap events they would have on each series regular season schedule. All four of the crown jewel events would be aired live on a major tv sports network to bring in the advertising revenue to support the events, this is very much needed for our sport and should already be happening. Also, both series should use A/B qualifying for all of their events, which should create much more passing in the A-Mains. More on this later.
                            Last edited by DirtPhantom; 04-09-2017, 08:10 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Clayton_Wetter
                              Banned
                              • May 2007
                              • 16671

                              #29

                              NO to shorter races. Yes to fewer classes

                              Now let's discuss the track prep, the real issue!!

                              Comment

                              • plunks7
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2007
                                • 3274

                                #30
                                No they shouldn't have shorter racing in the A-Mains!!!! If you don't agree stay home, simple as that.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X