Now LaSalle Speedway and Josh Richards in trouble with WRG / DIRTcar

[Bubstr]

After reading the article on DoD, this is all on Tony Izzo. He was told to not let them race and he chose to let them race anyway. There are consequences for your actions and Mr. Izzo is finding that out. Hopefully, he learns from his mistake and does not repeat it in the future.

Why would it be on Izzo? He was told not to let Best racing run. When Richards says Best sold it and Tony has no proof they didn't. What is Tony to do? Deny a entry that could be proved with a pre dated bill of sale for a team that is known to be litigious. Driggers was there. He didn't stop the entry. It took a month of investigating to find the entry is bogus. Izzo didn't have a month or a investigator. WRG is totally in the wrong. They where there and could have stopped that entry and didn't. The, I didn't want to do it BS, is BS. Driggers could have handled it better and didn't

[Black F]

Im going to say a kick back was on the cooler and never made to the grubby ump hands. Why else did it take them till now to take action?

[TackyTracker]

why would the best team even go if they hadn't signed correct doc's??? wouldn't they know the team was still suspended???

[WisWildManFan]

I can't wait to hear Tony's side... Wrg are a bunch of crooks

[thugginsince89]

This is the same track that was paying SUPER LATE MODELS 800 (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)ING DOLLARS TO WIN. Have nothing to say nice about the place.

[Highside Hustler25]

This is the same track that was paying SUPER LATE MODELS 800 (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)ING DOLLARS TO WIN. Have nothing to say nice about the place.

You know the purse before entering the gate. No one forced anybody to race there.

[klemmabyna]

Snats schedule at Dirt on Dirt:

has cancelled by the 2 lasalle dates, but not sycamore???

purely selfish, but those 2 tracks are the closest to my home. was looking forward attending.

[Highside Hustler25]

Snats schedule at Dirt on Dirt:

has cancelled by the 2 lasalle dates, but not sycamore???

purely selfish, but those 2 tracks are the closest to my home. was looking forward attending.

Pages have been getting changed or updated constantly on DoD. Probably as they get information, they update details.

Their is always a chance that someone might step up and promote Sycamores S.N. date. That way, no money would go through Tony's hands. The reason they pulled Sycamore was that Tony would benefit from that show since he was promoting it. Hopefully for the fans in that area, someone will pick it up.

psssssst! Hey Phil

[smooth32]

Why would it be on Izzo? He was told not to let Best racing run. When Richards says Best sold it and Tony has no proof they didn't. What is Tony to do? Deny a entry that could be proved with a pre dated bill of sale for a team that is known to be litigious. Driggers was there. He didn't stop the entry. It took a month of investigating to find the entry is bogus. Izzo didn't have a month or a investigator. WRG is totally in the wrong. They where there and could have stopped that entry and didn't. The, I didn't want to do it BS, is BS. Driggers could have handled it better and didn't

I was thinking the same thing. As a promoter, why would he care who owns the car? Unless LaSalle speedway banned him, can't see how this is Izzo's baby. Responsibility of the sanctioning body. Otherwise you put the promoter in a he said she said situation.

[dirtyba$tard]

Run the dates non sanctioned! Everyone has it on their calendar already!

[dirtdobber45]

The WRG rep that was at the race shouldve had the guts to go say something to JR and Best. Not leave to Izzo. If the paperwork had someone else besides Best as the owner of the car theres not much Izzo could do about it. Im pretty sure that would hold up in court. If not then Eldora should be in the same boat since Babc0ck was in a Best car earlier this year.

[onlyfacts]

Why would it be on Izzo? He was told not to let Best racing run. When Richards says Best sold it and Tony has no proof they didn't. What is Tony to do? Deny a entry that could be proved with a pre dated bill of sale for a team that is known to be litigious. Driggers was there. He didn't stop the entry. It took a month of investigating to find the entry is bogus. Izzo didn't have a month or a investigator. WRG is totally in the wrong. They where there and could have stopped that entry and didn't. The, I didn't want to do it BS, is BS. Driggers could have handled it better and didn't

We all know after that date that it wasn't sold... so if Best or Richards claimed that then clearly they lied because since then they have raced as Best Motortsports. One thing I see here is Best seems to be in the middle of controversy. Not sure who's fault it is but clearly something not on the up and up went down. Hate to see Josh dragged in to someone else's battle but he chose to do so.

[CMatich]

First let me say that I don't agree with everything that UMP/WRG does. UMP has gotten very far away from the dreams of Bob Memmer and his local racer ideas. I've seen first hand how tire sampling is handled and it's not good. But UMP/WRG does bring some sort of parity to a sport that is way to fractured across the board. On the other hand I've seen promoters do the wrong thing on and off the track as well. But there are tracks that go above and beyond too.

In this Best/LaSalle issue, Best simply tried pulling something and got caught. LaSalle got caught in the middle, but apparently didn't try to stop what was taking place. Richards, driving for Best, had to do what he was told to do. What surprises me is that ALL knew days in advance Best was going to LaSalle and yet nothing was done by ANYBODY prior to their arrival, thus this mess.

For fans to call for a boycott of UMP tracks is a not thought out idea. The only group/individual that would be hurt by this is the weekly tracks we all care about and attend. Would boycotts send a message? I guess, but at what cost? The better/simpler idea is an old school letter writing campaign. Any social media posts can be deleted/shut down, but the mail stream(if there actually was a huge turnout) arriving daily would get peoples attention.

Or how about this? We all continue to support the sport that all of us love and let the parties involved work it out. There are three sides to the story, WRG/UMP, LaSalle and Best and they are all big enough to deal with this themselves. They can do it one on one or if need be get lawyers involved. If those involved feel truly wronged and/or blamed incorrectly, they should pursue any legal action to clear their name if need be. Yes, it would cost money to litigate, but all involved could do it and should do it, to prove who is right and who is wrong.

As I've posted many times before, this sport we all love is pretty cool but let's put it into perspective. Man, look at the world today, there are far more things to get worked up, worried about and care about than if tracks lose a race date.

Or maybe Best should have thought more about what their intentions would cause before heading to LaSalle?

[MasterSbilt_Racer]

We all know after that date that it wasn't sold... so if Best or Richards claimed that then clearly they lied because since then they have raced as Best Motortsports. One thing I see here is Best seems to be in the middle of controversy. Not sure who's fault it is but clearly something not on the up and up went down. Hate to see Josh dragged in to someone else's battle but he chose to do so.

I am 99% certain the car Josh drove was owned by Best. That said, why couldn't a Best car be sitting somewhere owned by Riggs, Josh, Mark, or the Easter Bunny?

[Illtsate32]

I am 99% certain the car Josh drove was owned by Best. That said, why couldn't a Best car be sitting somewhere owned by Riggs, Josh, Mark, or the Easter Bunny?

Agreed there are no titles on these cars....my name was on my fathers car as the owner..I was 3 years old lol