Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer
View Post
Droop Rule and State of DLM Racing
Collapse
X
-
Your comparing apples and oranges, crates were an attempt to force everyone to spend the same on engines and a very liberal minded progressive approach in my book. I don't advocate for rules that stipulate that everyone run exactly the same thing of anything, that always leads to cheating. I'll try one last time to help you see the light, but its up to you if you even want to. You simply write the rules so the cars can't hike up excessively and have a maximum body height rule all the way around so they can't roll the car over on the nose without tearing it off. What this does is "Un-Hook" the car so you can't hook up 900HP anymore. Without traction it becomes really stupid to spend $45K on an engine that you are unable to take advantage of. Why buy 900Hp, when you can only use 700HP? If I were writing the rules, first I'd say limit the hike to 2-3 inches above ride height. Second I'd make the body height rule of 6 inches maximum all the way around the car. Third, I'd put in an RPM limit and make the ignition boxes claimable. Now you can buy whatever you want, spend whatever you want, but the car will only let you take advantage of so much.Originally posted by fastford View Postbut thats what the crate cares were suppose to do , limit the cost of the engines so like cagefaraday said , the have nots would have a chance , look how that turned out .......
The crate idea could've been something decent for the very low budget teams had they kept the purses low enough, instead of going head to head with super purses. Now its a Frankenstein monster, that is under powered and over hooked and regularly scalped by professionals looking to pad their income stream. Dumb, dumb, dumb. If you want to have a low budget class, you can't call it "Pro" late model and offer huge purses and not expect people to spend whatever is required to win. But again they are over hooked, so power/speed by any mean$ nece$$ary i$ a mu$t.
To me its not about limiting spending, its about making that spending less fruitful. Be as creative as you want to be, but you have to fit it in this box.Last edited by CageFaraday; 01-04-2018, 08:49 AM.“Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man.†— The Dude
Comment
-
Sorry , still cant see it new member , but carry on ............Originally posted by CageFaraday View PostYour comparing apples and oranges, crates were an attempt to force everyone to spend the same on engines and a very liberal minded progressive approach in my book. I don't advocate for rules that stipulate that everyone run exactly the same thing of anything, that always leads to cheating. I'll try one last time to help you see the light, but its up to you if you even want to. You simply write the rules so the cars can't hike up excessively and have a maximum body height rule all the way around so they can't roll the car over on the nose without tearing it off. What this does is "Un-Hook" the car so you can't hook up 900HP anymore. Without traction it becomes really stupid to spend $45K on an engine that you are unable to take advantage of. Why buy 900Hp, when you can only use 700HP? If I were writing the rules, first I'd say limit the hike to 2-3 inches above ride height. Second I'd make the body height rule of 6 inches maximum all the way around the car. Third, I'd put in an RPM limit and make the ignition boxes claimable. Now you can buy whatever you want, spend whatever you want, but the car will only let you take advantage of so much.
The crate idea could've been something decent for the very low budget teams had they kept the purses low enough, instead of going head to head with super purses. Now its a Frankenstein monster, that is under powered and over hooked and regularly scalped by professionals looking to pad their income stream. Dumb, dumb, dumb. If you want to have a low budget class, you can't call it "Pro" late model and offer huge purses and not expect people to spend whatever is required to win. But again they are over hooked, so power/speed by any mean$ nece$$ary i$ a mu$t.
To me its not about limiting spending, its about making that spending less fruitful. Be as creative as you want to be, but you have to fit it in this box.
Comment
-
This chain is just so the capital cars can keep up as they don't lean as much as the other cars,the higher you get the lr and lower you get the rf the faster you go,most turn overs are getting to one another or the wall not this chain deal ,if you don't want them to lean put the leafs on, this rule has already cost him the race at Boyds.
Comment
-
I’ve already been overwhelmed with requests for my spring rated chain. Each link is +$60 each. You do the math. This is another rule that back fired already. Some of the links are over $100Shocks by BGR army
Comment
-
-
So Highwayman, Leafmaster, etc, etc, etc, James White is a Rocket dealer? Capital ain’t keeping up with anyone, not just your favorite chassis brand.Originally posted by CageFaraday View Post...so said the rocket dealer.Up in the air who my next “favorite†driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normalâ€.
Comment
-
-
man , I cant believe it , I sat and watched all the late models at the ice bowl this week end and not one of them flipped without the droop rule , maybe they all just got lucky, i dont know , maybe some one on here can " Elucidate" this.......
Comment
-
I doubt you’ll get an answer on this, but we’ll see.Originally posted by Necrosis View PostOkay Brian Gray, here's an easy enough question. Who is your supplier? There are 2 patents on spring rated chains, and I'm involved with both companies. It's not like it's a secret who they are, so please elucidate!
Comment
-
Not one car flipped in Arizona and the racing was great with 50 cars for 5,000 to win without a droop rule. Guess when Ray actually has his first race with 15-20 cars and no big name drivers this will all go away. Pretty sure it will go away or Rays series will go away. One or the other.
Comment
Comment