Imcryn2,
Allow me to elaborate. Agree 100% with you that winning should reward the most points and provide an advantage over everyone else. (For that single race).
B-Shepp lost out on the '18 WoO title b/c of 2 dnf's. Bad nights happen in DLM racing, nature of the beast, but a points structure that is too punitive, doesn't make the championship chase better.
What I would do, if I was in charge of points.
Points for full-time touring drivers only.
1 pt to the fast qualifier for the night.
1 pt for a heat race win.
1 pt for leading the most laps in the feature.
1 pt for hard-charger in the feature.
50 pts for winning the main event.
*If the highest finishing touring driver finished in 2nd (49 pts), 3rd (48 pts), 4th (47pts), 5th (46pts), 6th or lower (45 pts)
2nd through 7th highest finishing touring driver
2 less points if they finish directly behind touring driver ahead of them.
3 less points otherwise
8th through 10th place touring drivers
All receive 3 less points than the 7th place touring driver.
11th through 14th (or however many full-timers a series has)
All receive 3 pts less than 10th highest touring driver.
For arguments sake, let's say a series has 12 full time touring drivers and they finish in order 1-12 in the feature:
1st:50 pts, 2nd:48, 3rd:46, 4th:44, 5th: 42, 6th: 40, 7th: 38, 8th: 35, 9th:35, 10th:35, 11th:32, 12th:32
Now let's say, highest touring driver finished 3rd, and there was a gap of 1 car or more between all the touring drivers in the feature:
1st: 48pts, 2nd: 45, 3rd: 42, 4th: 39, 5th: 36, 6th: 33, 7th: 30, 8th: 27, 9th: 27, 10th: 27, 11th: 24, 12th: 24
Bottom line for me is this: If the nightly payout has little to no difference from 8th place on back, the points structure should do the same.
Allow me to elaborate. Agree 100% with you that winning should reward the most points and provide an advantage over everyone else. (For that single race).
B-Shepp lost out on the '18 WoO title b/c of 2 dnf's. Bad nights happen in DLM racing, nature of the beast, but a points structure that is too punitive, doesn't make the championship chase better.
What I would do, if I was in charge of points.
Points for full-time touring drivers only.
1 pt to the fast qualifier for the night.
1 pt for a heat race win.
1 pt for leading the most laps in the feature.
1 pt for hard-charger in the feature.
50 pts for winning the main event.
*If the highest finishing touring driver finished in 2nd (49 pts), 3rd (48 pts), 4th (47pts), 5th (46pts), 6th or lower (45 pts)
2nd through 7th highest finishing touring driver
2 less points if they finish directly behind touring driver ahead of them.
3 less points otherwise
8th through 10th place touring drivers
All receive 3 less points than the 7th place touring driver.
11th through 14th (or however many full-timers a series has)
All receive 3 pts less than 10th highest touring driver.
For arguments sake, let's say a series has 12 full time touring drivers and they finish in order 1-12 in the feature:
1st:50 pts, 2nd:48, 3rd:46, 4th:44, 5th: 42, 6th: 40, 7th: 38, 8th: 35, 9th:35, 10th:35, 11th:32, 12th:32
Now let's say, highest touring driver finished 3rd, and there was a gap of 1 car or more between all the touring drivers in the feature:
1st: 48pts, 2nd: 45, 3rd: 42, 4th: 39, 5th: 36, 6th: 33, 7th: 30, 8th: 27, 9th: 27, 10th: 27, 11th: 24, 12th: 24
Bottom line for me is this: If the nightly payout has little to no difference from 8th place on back, the points structure should do the same.
Comment