Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer
View Post
Hoosier releases new RR tire for LM racing, and it's even wider.
Collapse
X
-
Precisely. If the front isn't working "efficiently"(it gets to the corner first) then you have to then make changes to the setup to offset that short coming. So you keep making changes(compromises) to try an get the rear of the car to do more to steer the car. As long as the front end isn't getting the job done the rest of the car is forced to compensate and subsequently you never get the balance you need."In the Republic of Mediocrity, Genius is Dangerous." - Robert Green Ingersoll
-
For me, RTJ doesn't steer his way around the track as much as he has complete confidence in his ability to catch the car and get forward drive to avoid spinning out. He throws the car in massively like a Sprint car then chases it around/off the corner. Bloomer drove his cars. RTJ (currently one of the best) just slings the car sideways (I suppose Pierce does too) and catches it. Completely opposite of what Bloomer/McDowell/Erbe Jr do. While they set their car it's not nearly as aggressive.Originally posted by Henry Every View Post
Precisely. If the front isn't working "efficiently"(it gets to the corner first) then you have to then make changes to the setup to offset that short coming. So you keep making changes(compromises) to try an get the rear of the car to do more to steer the car. As long as the front end isn't getting the job done the rest of the car is forced to compensate and subsequently you never get the balance you need.
Does that make sense? He doesn't really depend on the whole front end biting. Just steers with RF after pitching it. He makes sure the car is bent enough to get pointed off the corner.
Comment
-
-
-
Should probably talk about them digging a piece of debris out of the track under yellow which I was told happened. The 2 that I spoke with were cut down. We had 4 RRs blowout all due to wear. 2 were new construction and 2 were old construction.Originally posted by manwplan View PostIn midst of DoD writing endless Hoosier slurp articles, are we going to talk about all the new RR's that went flat at Tazwell while Terbo had the old tire on?
👍 1Comment
-
Or we could talk about the fact that this NLMT deal was supposed to put an end to having so many tires for the teams to manage. Once again, a sensible rule is being perverted for the sake of the dollar.Originally posted by flagone View Post
Should probably talk about them digging a piece of debris out of the track under yellow which I was told happened. The 2 that I spoke with were cut down. We had 4 RRs blowout all due to wear. 2 were new construction and 2 were old construction.
👍 1Comment
-
-
Back in the late '80s-early '90s when we had dozens of Late Model tracks in northern California & Nevada the tire rule was, basically, any 11" tire. Teams were going broke with tire bills. McCreary was the main thing then and the moneyed guys were running 0 & 1s which were bald after one night at a weekly show that paid, maybe $500. Finally after a lot of arguing got everybody on an EC2 and the rich teams only b!tched for a couple of weeks until they found they were getting 3-6 nights on them. We were all on them, they were decent and the tire bills dropped dramatically, racing was closer and it made happier racers. During this time I was at, what I consider, the GOAT's shop in Batesville and they had something like 225 mounted tires of every make and model. We both thought that that was nuts, and I still do.
Comment
-
The 2.25 is a 1325 witch was the tire of choice in the mid Atlantic / northeast region. It is used at all the local tracks in that area just not on the national tours. It was released to combat the influx of the American racers in that region because their 48 was equivalent to a 1325. The 2.5 is a 1350 witch is the tire of choice in the southeast also released to compete with ar. The problem with the 2.25 when initially released was it was still in the lm/nlmt sidewall/ width configuration so while the compound was correct it still struggled to compete with the ar because they are still their original open comp construction witch was more similar to the previously made nrm hoosiers. They have basically went back to the open competition nrm right rear tire it is just preblocked now. Also it's funny that they say its wider. While the treadwith may technically be wider the actual tire when mounted on a wheel is narrower overall by over a 1/2 inchOriginally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
You are right. It was the 2.25 they added last year that nobody used. All the tires are slowly coming back, that got eliminated when the 1,2,3,4 came out.
Comment
-
Yes, it's all about the AR competition. Bring back the white dots. Lol. 1350 was a good tire for my area as well.Originally posted by Jking24 View Post
The 2.25 is a 1325 witch was the tire of choice in the mid Atlantic / northeast region. It is used at all the local tracks in that area just not on the national tours. It was released to combat the influx of the American racers in that region because their 48 was equivalent to a 1325. The 2.5 is a 1350 witch is the tire of choice in the southeast also released to compete with ar. The problem with the 2.25 when initially released was it was still in the lm/nlmt sidewall/ width configuration so while the compound was correct it still struggled to compete with the ar because they are still their original open comp construction witch was more similar to the previously made nrm hoosiers. They have basically went back to the open competition nrm right rear tire it is just preblocked now. Also it's funny that they say its wider. While the treadwith may technically be wider the actual tire when mounted on a wheel is narrower overall by over a 1/2 inchModern Day Spec Wedge Racing
👍 1Comment
Comment