20 quick things that are wrong with short track racing.

[fastford]

the only problem I have with gate fees here locally is to get in the stands, its 10 bucks, same as its been for years, and 12 and under is free, but to get in the pits, its 25 and 4 and under is free. 25 is to much to pay for a 5 or 6 year old. My biggest complaint over all would be number 15 on the list, not enough tech, especially in crates.

[fastford]

may be fred, but most concert goers only go to one or two concerts a year, I have friends trying to race in street stocks and pony classes , because that's what they can afford, with 3 or 4 kids and a wife, that's 125 to 150 just to get in, every sat night. I know the back gate pays the purses, but at least make it the same as the front on the age thing...JMO

[fastford]

is there anything not foolish about racing anymore?

[pink floyd]

When I started going to races it was 75 cent to maybe a 1.00. Same as what a movie cost. Nothing has changed. You see an evening of racing for the same cost as a movie. Pretty fair IMO.

I can remember paying 50 cents, then 1.00, then 2.00, and now 12.00 to 15.00 at most tracks which is very reasonable.

[Josh Bayko]

is there anything not foolish about racing anymore?

Well one thing that's not foolish about racing is making sure your safety equipment is the best that's available.

[TS FAN]

My Grandfather built the first dirt track in Cincy area back in 1949, My parents worked the concessions, and i was a little tyke sitting in the stands. I believe the cost was .50 to get in.

[zach51]

Not to sound mean, but if you have 4 kids and can't afford to race, that is a YOU problem. Don't blame the promoter. Kids are fantastic don't get me wrong (wish I had some of my own), but I don't want to hear the argument about how you can't afford it. Take some personal responsibility.

[fastford]

first off, I don't have 4 kids, if I did I m sure I would not be racing, im just saying that making a parent pay full admission for a 5 year old to get in the pits with you is ridicules , sure you could drop them off at the front where they get in free, but then some one has to watch them. every one cant afford to race a late model, so there is cheaper classes for them, like one of the 20 points mentioned, don't put them down. if the tracks don't start embracing ALL racers and try to help, then this whole discussion is probably irrelevant anyway.

[fastford]

Not to sound mean, but if you have 4 kids and can't afford to race, that is a YOU problem. Don't blame the promoter. Kids are fantastic don't get me wrong (wish I had some of my own), but I don't want to hear the argument about how you can't afford it. Take some personal responsibility.

do you race? just curious.

[huskerdirt]

first off, I don't have 4 kids, if I did I m sure I would not be racing, im just saying that making a parent pay full admission for a 5 year old to get in the pits with you is ridicules , sure you could drop them off at the front where they get in free, but then some one has to watch them. every one cant afford to race a late model, so there is cheaper classes for them, like one of the 20 points mentioned, don't put them down. if the tracks don't start embracing ALL racers and try to help, then this whole discussion is probably irrelevant anyway.

Who is making them pay full price? There is an alternative it's the called the grandstand. Not to long ago, most tracks had a strict age restriction on getting into the pits. Quite frankly I wish tracks would go back to that.

[zach51]

I no longer race, I did for 8 years. I decided I no longer wanted to spend the money. My point being, if you have 10 kids or no kids, don't stretch your family thin. Nobody will think you are less of a man on monday mornings at the gas station before work while you are getting your biscuit because you didn't bring the racecar out saturday night. That's all I'm saying. It's ok to not be able to afford it. I would love to still drive, but I was a fan first anyways, so I enjoy watching just as well.

[zach51]

And I don't see where anybody was putting down the lower classes. Nothing wrong with racing a lower class, just don't complain to me about having to buy tires and diapers in the same week. If a couple of pit passes are going to make or break you (and when I say "you" I don't mean you personally just anybody in proximity to this text), you might consider selling the racecar or parking it for a while.

[acetone]

And I don't see where anybody was putting down the lower classes. Nothing wrong with racing a lower class, just don't complain to me about having to buy tires and diapers in the same week. If a couple of pit passes are going to make or break you (and when I say "you" I don't mean you personally just anybody in proximity to this text), you might consider selling the racecar or parking it for a while.

what he said. also the people with 200,000 haulers complaining about the price.

[HEAVY DUTY]

I guess I am old but, I remember when drivers got in free, and only 3 people were allowed in the pits with a car. Women and children had to go to the grandstands. This was at a Nascar weekly track. Everybody who went in the pits had to wear white pants, so they could be seen by the drivers. They had a womens division, and the women came out of the stands, raced, and then went back to the stands. They had less fighting then. The tracks made it back then thru the front gate, not the back. The drivers are putting on the show, why are they having to pay for the show they are putting on. The promoters have gotten somewhat lazy by thinking, we will just charge 3 times as much to get in the pits as the stands, and not worry about putting on a show to put people in the grandstands. Do actors pay to be a star in a movie? Why are racers treated any different? We get charged 30 to 35 dollars for pit passes at a regular show around here. Then they charge us 10 more for transponders, or 5 if we use our own transponder. They charge a driver 2 pit passes if he runs 2 classes of cars. Then they have entry fees, when they have a big show. The grandstands are empty, the weeds need cut, and the tracks are pretty much unraceable, but that is all we have. I love traveling out of the area to race, but that isn't always an option. When I go other places, to a really racey, nice prepared track, I hear the drivers complaining about how bad it is there. I tell them," you should have to race where I do, you would appreciate this track more" Some of them tell me," If I had to race where you race, I would quit". Sadly, that is what is happening. People are quitting, and the promoters think it is just the economy. But what it amounts to is, racing has always, and will always cost a lot, but when it isn't as much fun as the cost, it is time to quit. If your racetrack is well prepared, not hard on equipment, and racey, the fun to cost ratio is a lot more positive, and racers will find a way to keep racing. If the tracks are one groove, hard on tires, motors and sheetmetal, the racers don't have fun, and the fun to cost ratio becomes negative, they soon quit.

[fastford]

well said HEAVY DUTY. zach51, I do still race, but I race within my means, my family comes first , period. the part about putting down the lower classes comes from point number 13 on the list this thread was started about, which I happen to agree with. every one has had to make sacrifices when it comes to racing in this day and age. if a track does not cater to the racers , then you lose racers, if you lose racers, then you lose fans, if you lose fans, then there less money for the track to help the racers. to make this circle work, EVERYONE has to contribute, and it has to start with the track. ive never operated a track, but ive been a fan and a racer , and if I go to a track that is ran poorly, I rarely go back. I also seriously doubt the ones with the 200,000 dollar haulers are complaining about money as mentioned above.