I’ve been thinking about this recently regarding many USAC (open wheel) teams, and a comment in the Rice brothers thread provoked me to start a discussion. Outside of having an ace driver behind the seat (and the number of those out there is arguable, I’d say less than 15-20 in the country), would a late model team owner that is actually hoping to make a few bucks rather than lose a few not be better off with a rent-a-ride fleet? Whether it be an experienced driver that may be out of a ride and just want to run select events, or a guy that maybe has some racing experience and just want to dabble here and there and show up with the helmet bad without the stress of having to maintain a car. If you had a rig that could haul two cars, and you rented them for $2,000 to $5,000 an event based on the laps and demand for a ride in the event, I’d think an owner would have a lot better shot at making a buck. Granted, for owners that just want to win (and I don’t know of anybody in racing that doesn’t want to win) they may not see consistent results, but maybe can turn a profit.
Many cars in the USAC classes (i.e. Keith Kunz are rental/sponsor subsidized/however you want to call it funded) switch drivers throughout the year. 1/3 of the cars at the Chili Bowl probably have drivers in them that wouldn’t be if they didn’t bring money.
I’m sure there are some dirt late model owners out there that do this, but you just don’t see or hear about it as much as in open wheel (even IndyCar).
Thoughts?
Many cars in the USAC classes (i.e. Keith Kunz are rental/sponsor subsidized/however you want to call it funded) switch drivers throughout the year. 1/3 of the cars at the Chili Bowl probably have drivers in them that wouldn’t be if they didn’t bring money.
I’m sure there are some dirt late model owners out there that do this, but you just don’t see or hear about it as much as in open wheel (even IndyCar).
Thoughts?
Comment