Has anyone did any dyno work with the new crate fuel? If so how were the numbers compared to other fuels and how much carb tweaking was there to do? I never did really like CHP so I am wondering how different it is.
New VP CRATE Fuel
Collapse
X
-
we did conduct a fuel test on Wednesday of this week for VP racing fuel
the tested fuels were our own break-in/evalution fuel---VP's C9---VP's CHP and VP's new VP crate
the initial testing was dyno numbers on a 604 using a Stealth 700 carb and adjusting the fuel curve to maximize power
then we continued with evaporation rates-----burn rates, BTU comparisons also some of our own chemical tests
we will issue an official report to VP early next week but we do have a favorable opinion of the new VP crate fuel
Brad
-
I can confirm what stockcar5 has stated----VP crate is relabeled VP113
we did not know this at the time of our testing ----and does it really matter?
VP officials have given us valid reasons for the relabel but in the end its a very good fuel for the 604 crate
stores much better than CHP and through tuning makes compareable power to CHP
Brad
Comment
-
brad what is the price compared to vp113? we were paying $450 per barrel iirc last year for vp113.Originally posted by brad hibbard View PostI can confirm what stockcar5 has stated----VP crate is relabeled VP113
we did not know this at the time of our testing ----and does it really matter?
VP officials have given us valid reasons for the relabel but in the end its a very good fuel for the 604 crate
stores much better than CHP and through tuning makes compareable power to CHP
Brad
Comment
-
no idea on price ---we have never sold fuel and don't intend on selling
as a comparison the price varys all over the country on the retail end not to mention quantity and wholesale orders
Brad
Comment
-
we do independant testing for several fuel companys----our fuel tests are extensive and time consuming----we do not charge them for the tests but require them to supply the fuel------
Brad
Comment
-
Brad have you tested the chp_+
Vp is claiming it is now better than chp.
Have you ever tested sonoco 260 or 260 gt?
What are the storage issues you speak of for chp?
Ive been running methanol and am wanting to run gas.
Thanks JeffLast edited by stock car driver; 05-11-2015, 09:46 PM.
Comment
-
Jeff,
what are your complaints with the methanol?
classes with NO fuel rule we recommend methanol
we have tested CHP+ and at this time I think its best for us not to reveal our test results as several sanctions are analyzing the fuel (I don't want to influence their decisions)
Storage----
CHP "type" fuels have a short shelf life once opened
does NOT like sunlight
does NOT like air
keeping the fuel sealed in STEEL containers is important for storage
plastic fuel jugs are the enemy
plugging the vent on the fuel cell during the week is an advatage
purchasing the fuel in 5 gal. steel cans rather than 55 gal. drums helps
as ever
Brad
Comment
-
-
now your talking chassis stuff and at the end of the day thats what really wins races.
sometimes we lose site of the big picture
burn off would be a downside to methanol but CHP+ will also have an elevated burn off
Comment
-
Agree. chp doesn't sound like what I want. Im trying sonoco 260gt first, its supposed to compare to vpcrate, I like the person I can get the sonoco from much much better than the vp products.Originally posted by brad hibbard View Postnow your talking chassis stuff and at the end of the day thats what really wins races.
sometimes we lose site of the big picture
burn off would be a downside to methanol but CHP+ will also have an elevated burn off
Comment
Comment