New VP CRATE Fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ftrent4q
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 21

    #1

    New VP CRATE Fuel

    Has anyone did any dyno work with the new crate fuel? If so how were the numbers compared to other fuels and how much carb tweaking was there to do? I never did really like CHP so I am wondering how different it is.
  • brad hibbard
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2007
    • 974

    #2
    we did conduct a fuel test on Wednesday of this week for VP racing fuel

    the tested fuels were our own break-in/evalution fuel---VP's C9---VP's CHP and VP's new VP crate

    the initial testing was dyno numbers on a 604 using a Stealth 700 carb and adjusting the fuel curve to maximize power

    then we continued with evaporation rates-----burn rates, BTU comparisons also some of our own chemical tests

    we will issue an official report to VP early next week but we do have a favorable opinion of the new VP crate fuel

    Brad

    Comment

    • sidebite7
      Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 32

      #3
      is the VP crate fuel and VP CHP similar in $$ ? which is cheaper ?

      Comment

      • lov2race
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 31

        #4
        I m new to fule and trying to learn fule so here it gos vp uses MTBE in ther CHP and some threr fuels , MTBE is can not be used in some states and only 2% to %5 in some state Just Google MTBE lawsuit and see for your self

        thanks for looking

        Comment

        • stockcar5
          Senior Member
          • May 2007
          • 1289

          #5
          according to Vp, the Vp crate fuel is a relabeled version of VP113. The VP113 works well for us in 10.5 to one 360's. i have a few friends running it in crates and it works well also.

          Comment

          • brad hibbard
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2007
            • 974

            #6
            I can confirm what stockcar5 has stated----VP crate is relabeled VP113

            we did not know this at the time of our testing ----and does it really matter?

            VP officials have given us valid reasons for the relabel but in the end its a very good fuel for the 604 crate

            stores much better than CHP and through tuning makes compareable power to CHP

            Brad

            Comment

            • stockcar5
              Senior Member
              • May 2007
              • 1289

              #7
              Originally posted by brad hibbard View Post
              I can confirm what stockcar5 has stated----VP crate is relabeled VP113

              we did not know this at the time of our testing ----and does it really matter?

              VP officials have given us valid reasons for the relabel but in the end its a very good fuel for the 604 crate

              stores much better than CHP and through tuning makes compareable power to CHP

              Brad
              brad what is the price compared to vp113? we were paying $450 per barrel iirc last year for vp113.

              Comment

              • brad hibbard
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2007
                • 974

                #8
                no idea on price ---we have never sold fuel and don't intend on selling

                as a comparison the price varys all over the country on the retail end not to mention quantity and wholesale orders


                Brad

                Comment

                • stockcar5
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2007
                  • 1289

                  #9
                  i wasn't looking to buy. was just curious what you paid for the crate fuel you tested. I plan on sticking with the vp113 this year.

                  Comment

                  • brad hibbard
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 974

                    #10
                    we do independant testing for several fuel companys----our fuel tests are extensive and time consuming----we do not charge them for the tests but require them to supply the fuel------

                    Brad

                    Comment

                    • stock car driver
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 3233

                      #11
                      Brad have you tested the chp_+

                      Vp is claiming it is now better than chp.

                      Have you ever tested sonoco 260 or 260 gt?

                      What are the storage issues you speak of for chp?

                      Ive been running methanol and am wanting to run gas.

                      Thanks Jeff
                      Last edited by stock car driver; 05-11-2015, 09:46 PM.

                      Comment

                      • brad hibbard
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2007
                        • 974

                        #12
                        Jeff,
                        what are your complaints with the methanol?
                        classes with NO fuel rule we recommend methanol

                        we have tested CHP+ and at this time I think its best for us not to reveal our test results as several sanctions are analyzing the fuel (I don't want to influence their decisions)

                        Storage----
                        CHP "type" fuels have a short shelf life once opened
                        does NOT like sunlight
                        does NOT like air
                        keeping the fuel sealed in STEEL containers is important for storage
                        plastic fuel jugs are the enemy
                        plugging the vent on the fuel cell during the week is an advatage
                        purchasing the fuel in 5 gal. steel cans rather than 55 gal. drums helps

                        as ever
                        Brad

                        Comment

                        • stock car driver
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 3233

                          #13
                          Burn off with methanol

                          Comment

                          • brad hibbard
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 974

                            #14
                            now your talking chassis stuff and at the end of the day thats what really wins races.

                            sometimes we lose site of the big picture

                            burn off would be a downside to methanol but CHP+ will also have an elevated burn off

                            Comment

                            • stock car driver
                              Senior Member
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 3233

                              #15
                              Originally posted by brad hibbard View Post
                              now your talking chassis stuff and at the end of the day thats what really wins races.

                              sometimes we lose site of the big picture

                              burn off would be a downside to methanol but CHP+ will also have an elevated burn off
                              Agree. chp doesn't sound like what I want. Im trying sonoco 260gt first, its supposed to compare to vpcrate, I like the person I can get the sonoco from much much better than the vp products.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X